Eddie and Frank debate on Five Live
Posted: 20 Mar 2013, 06:24
Spot on mate. Once you’ve sold the crown jewels they’re gone.MachoMan09 wrote:Me too. Bunce is good on the radio. I think they're all right to varing degrees. Particularly in the case that it's obvious that there is not enough money in the game to pay fighters megabucks just for turning over.
Boxing marginalised itself by moving to Sky in the first place. The argument that I'm wrong because Ricky was the most popular fighter the country has ever seen and he didn't fight on terrestrial television once is weak. Ricky's fanbase were the kids who grew up on Benn vs Eubank etc on ITV. There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
He was not the same presenter he was on Setanta for sure.Chris W 1982 wrote:Great listen. I see Bunce as a Allegedly channel presenter now and no longer an impartial sports journalist.
Didn't Boxing have to look for a new home when ITV lost interest after Benn-McLellan? Rather than it being boxings choice to go to SkyMachoMan09 wrote:Me too. Bunce is good on the radio. I think they're all right to varing degrees. Particularly in the case that it's obvious that there is not enough money in the game to pay fighters megabucks just for turning over.
Boxing marginalised itself by moving to Sky in the first place. The argument that I'm wrong because Ricky was the most popular fighter the country has ever seen and he didn't fight on terrestrial television once is weak. Ricky's fanbase were the kids who grew up on Benn vs Eubank etc on ITV. There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
MachoMan09 wrote:Has there ever been an exclusively impartial journalist? Name me one.Chris W 1982 wrote:I see Bunce as a Allegedly channel presenter now and no longer an impartial sports journalist.
Correct Sky picked up boxing when nobody else wanted it.Chambers2 wrote:Didn't Boxing have to look for a new home when ITV lost interest after Benn-McLellan? Rather than it being boxings choice to go to SkyMachoMan09 wrote:Me too. Bunce is good on the radio. I think they're all right to varing degrees. Particularly in the case that it's obvious that there is not enough money in the game to pay fighters megabucks just for turning over.
Boxing marginalised itself by moving to Sky in the first place. The argument that I'm wrong because Ricky was the most popular fighter the country has ever seen and he didn't fight on terrestrial television once is weak. Ricky's fanbase were the kids who grew up on Benn vs Eubank etc on ITV. There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
Agree with this. If you look at the youtube generation; a UFC promo video will get close to 1 million hits whereas a HBO or Showtime video promoting a video only numbers in the thousands.MachoMan09 wrote: There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
Ta Andy, well played
Well, in York, we only had one gym for as long as i can remember, now we have four in the aba, all the kids want to give it a go. We have lads out in Leeds tonight, Barnsley tomorrow and Leeds again Friday. It truly is thriving. Maybe when this lot grow up, they will become fans. Maybe amatuer will replace pro in terms of popularity? Luke Campbell is already one of the best known fighters in the country and will be earning more than all the Bantams if you throw in his Dancing and other commercial stuff around Yorkshire. He must have turned on every Christmas lights in a 40 mile radius of Hull!black panther wrote:Agree with this. If you look at the youtube generation; a UFC promo video will get close to 1 million hits whereas a HBO or Showtime video promoting a video only numbers in the thousands.MachoMan09 wrote: There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
watched that fight round a neighbours house.BIGMARK wrote:Yes that was it. I was running a sports bar in the early days of Sky / Warrens boxing relationship and we always be packed for the fight nights, I remember the big night that was Naz - Johnson which I thi k ended up a record day due to a decent football international in the afternoonDead Mouse wrote:Nah, you're thinking of when he clowned about Vs Belcastro live on ITV. Hamed fought the week after McClellan and sparked out Liendo. It was a scary KO and Hamed didn't appear contrite enough about having KO'd someone a week after the McClellan tragedy. ITV lost their nerve. By April 6 Warren had moved his fighters to Sky in a 50,000,000 deal. ITV stumbled along, but the McClellan fight had knocked the stuffing out of them.BIGMARK wrote:
Yes, if I remember correctly the week after the Benn fight Naz was on ITV and was very disrespectful in defending his euro title. This I believe was the final straw for ITV
well playedDead Mouse wrote:Nah, you're thinking of when he clowned about Vs Belcastro live on ITV. Hamed fought the week after McClellan and sparked out Liendo. It was a scary KO and Hamed didn't appear contrite enough about having KO'd someone a week after the McClellan tragedy. ITV lost their nerve. By April 6 Warren had moved his fighters to Sky in a 50,000,000 deal. ITV stumbled along, but the McClellan fight had knocked the stuffing out of them.BIGMARK wrote:
Yes, if I remember correctly the week after the Benn fight Naz was on ITV and was very disrespectful in defending his euro title. This I believe was the final straw for ITV
UFC was exclusive to PPV and cable TV in the US until the past year. Its all about marketing.black panther wrote:Agree with this. If you look at the youtube generation; a UFC promo video will get close to 1 million hits whereas a HBO or Showtime video promoting a video only numbers in the thousands.MachoMan09 wrote: There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.
Don't forget Destiny's child. They would be there too singing that song.forcefraser wrote:Bunny is a survivor. If a nuclear bomb fell the only things left would be him and a load of insects.
This is exactly it... while boxing's promoters have remained in the dark ages in marketing terms and refused to invest in their product. They're now paying the price for that short-termism...JamesH wrote:UFC are the Microsoft of sport. They took a product, packaged it up all pretty, and voilà. The skill is marketing, that's all, but they have it wrapped up beautifully - and I'm not even a fan of it.
You can have millions of kids, but that means nothing if they've got nothing to watch. Boxing is becoming more and more marginalised, because almost every promoter in the sport is a self righteous/self serving cock end. Over the last few years it been clearly proven that you can't go round matching your fighters up with dummies for 20 to 25 fights and then refuse to work with other promoters in making the fights the fans want to see. Yet this continues to happen. Boxing is the only sport where the athlete's and promoters/managers try to tell the paying customer what we want to see. Then you have fighters expecting to make silly numbers to take any sort of risk. That's all good well, but if the money is not there, it's not there. You have to be realistic, especially if your not a ticket sller.mickey1975 wrote:Well, in York, we only had one gym for as long as i can remember, now we have four in the aba, all the kids want to give it a go. We have lads out in Leeds tonight, Barnsley tomorrow and Leeds again Friday. It truly is thriving. Maybe when this lot grow up, they will become fans. Maybe amatuer will replace pro in terms of popularity? Luke Campbell is already one of the best known fighters in the country and will be earning more than all the Bantams if you throw in his Dancing and other commercial stuff around Yorkshire. He must have turned on every Christmas lights in a 40 mile radius of Hull!black panther wrote:Agree with this. If you look at the youtube generation; a UFC promo video will get close to 1 million hits whereas a HBO or Showtime video promoting a video only numbers in the thousands.MachoMan09 wrote: There is no significant new generation of boxing fan.