Page 1 of 2
Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 15:16
by Shambles
Gerber just beat Oloukun on points but took some massive shots in the last two and looked like he wanted out. It was frustrating as I wanted Oloukun to win, if only he had better stamina he would have got the ko in my opinion.
Groves got an easy win against Baker Barakat, the referee stopping it (rightly) in the second after GG landed a really good right hand forcing Barakat to back up against the ropes.
Melissa McMorrow v Nadia Raoui is on now, good fight so far - had to laugh when Bunce said women's boxing has it's knockers
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:05
by Bard of Boxrec
why are these two fighting again? anyone know?
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:12
by Adamj1987
Riddick Blowe wrote:why are these two fighting again? anyone know?
Mandatory rematch
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:35
by dookus
Abraham badly hurt end of the 2nd
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:35
by Deno1986
What a fight this is turning into! Stieglitz nearly had AA gone at the end of second. AA eye looking bad.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:40
by Deno1986
I think Abraham just quit.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:40
by dookus
Abraham doesn't come out for 4th round, his left eye is totally shut
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:42
by The Insider
AAs left eye is totally shut. The corner did the right thing in retiring him.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:43
by ShadrachSimmo
No much you can do with one eye. Well done steiglitz. Groves next maybe?
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:43
by ThereByTheGrace
Deno1986 wrote:I think Abraham just quit.
x2
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:43
by winkveron
Pretty determined and brutal performance by Stieglitz, reminiscent of Froch-Bute. Could Groves live with Stieglitz in that mood?
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:44
by Horse
winkveron wrote:Pretty determined and brutal performance by Stieglitz, reminiscent of Froch-Bute. Could Groves live with Stieglitz in that mood?
I'd like to find out.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:44
by Final round
Sounds like a great win for Steiglitz but not at home to see it!
Stick Groves in with him now
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:45
by winkveron
Me too!
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:45
by Deno1986
ShadrachSimmo wrote:No much you can do with one eye. Well done steiglitz. Groves next maybe?
Yeah I think so. Stieglitz looked good but Abraham was a standing punchbag.
Abraham didn't fancy it from the first bell if you ask me. He had a few wild swings in round 2 and that was as much as he offered.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:46
by winkveron
UD for Helenius over Sprott on the undercard
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:49
by Bard of Boxrec
ugh at all these paper title histrionics.
stieglitz is a proven fringe-level fighter and suddenly they're talking him up.
Who knows how Groves does versus this guy but Froch or Kessler would crush him.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:51
by winkveron
Riddick Blowe wrote:ugh at all these paper title histrionics.
stieglitz is a proven fringe-level fighter and suddenly they're talking him up.
Who knows how Groves does versus this guy but Froch or Kessler would crush him.
No one is saying he'd beat Froch or Kessler. But there are a lot of Groves rumours so I don't see why discussing it is a problem. Fringe-level or not you cannot deny that was a pretty decent effort by him.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 18:52
by ThereByTheGrace
Riddick Blowe wrote:ugh at all these paper title histrionics.
stieglitz is a proven fringe-level fighter and suddenly they're talking him up.
Who knows how Groves does versus this guy but Froch or Kessler would crush him.
Groves would beat them both.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 19:08
by ShadrachSimmo
winkveron wrote:Pretty determined and brutal performance by Stieglitz, reminiscent of Froch-Bute. Could Groves live with Stieglitz in that mood?
I see what your saying but AA didn't take the beating Bute did. Had the eye not closed I feel it may have evened out the longer it went. Who can say for etc...?
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 19:12
by Deno1986
ShadrachSimmo wrote:winkveron wrote:Pretty determined and brutal performance by Stieglitz, reminiscent of Froch-Bute. Could Groves live with Stieglitz in that mood?
I see what your saying but AA didn't take the beating Bute did. Had the eye not closed I feel it may have evened out the longer it went. Who can say for etc...?
I kind of agree. Even though AA didn't look interested and wasn't doing anything (which is how he normally starts), I doubt Stieglitz could have kept up that pace for the whole fight.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 23 Mar 2013, 19:56
by Terrrrry
I was about to have a tenner on an AA stoppage inside the distance at the end of the 3rd

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 04:37
by sharpei_louis
Deno1986 wrote:ShadrachSimmo wrote:winkveron wrote:Pretty determined and brutal performance by Stieglitz, reminiscent of Froch-Bute. Could Groves live with Stieglitz in that mood?
I see what your saying but AA didn't take the beating Bute did. Had the eye not closed I feel it may have evened out the longer it went. Who can say for etc...?
I kind of agree. Even though AA didn't look interested and wasn't doing anything (which is how he normally starts),
I doubt Stieglitz could have kept up that pace for the whole fight.
Less than a third of the fight was enough though wasn't it!
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 05:35
by whiskey
Uli Wegner - just do not rate him as a trainer. I can't understand what he says, but he comes across as a 'shouter'. His fighters' styles are crude.
Abraham was fierce once, but he's gone really stale since S6 and needs a new team or retire.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard
Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 08:34
by loaded_gloves
Hold on, the WBO force mandatories now?
Where did that come from?
Joe Calzaghe had two mandatories in 10 years - both times against the undeserving Mario Weit.
Amazes me that anyone considers the WBO a major belt.