Page 1 of 1
Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:41
by 15829
Do they think it's only casual fans watching who will believe everything they say, Watt and Halling were more cheerleaders than commentators
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:48
by CheckHook
Crap commentary tonight, really disappointing to be honest.... More than just the actual scoring was the derogatory tone and attitude they had towards Chilemba. Sure his workrate was fairly low but he was boxing Bellews ears off at times and instead of getting acknowledged it was just being ignored or summed up as 'awkward' or 'difficult customer' and all those type of phrases that imply the guy is a spoiler when actually he was much the cleaner boxer, he just didn't put his foot on the gas early enough to secure the decision. (I still had it 115-113 Chilemba)
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:51
by kaiserbill
Watt, as an ex boxer, is simply awful.
I have to turn the commentary off to preserve my sanity.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:52
by banjo
I enjoyed playing Jim Watt catchprase bingo :)
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:54
by 15829
banjo wrote:I enjoyed playing Jim Watt catchprase bingo :)
I don't think my liver could take it
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:54
by kaiserbill
banjo wrote:I enjoyed playing Jim Watt catchprase bingo :)
I've said it before, and will say it again:
Watch these commentators with some mates who aren't British.
It's shockingly embarrassing.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:55
by banjo
"ohbeauuuuuuuutifulshot!"
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:57
by Sweet P
Yes shocking commentory. I thought Chilemba edged it. I couldnt believe the way they carried on.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:59
by handsofstone
Ive gotta say that out of all the commentators in Britain and Worldwide,I agree with Jim Watt the most but tonight i think he had the same glasses on he was wearing when he watched David Haye/Nikolai Valuev,not one of his better nights,we all have them AND yes i am Scottish
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 20:59
by ROCKYMARSHMELLOW
Yep piss poor... Jim Watt has always been the same.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 21:01
by kaiserbill
handsofstone wrote:Ive gotta say that out of all the commentators in Britain and Worldwide,I agree with Jim Watt the most but tonight i think he had the same glasses on he was wearing when he watched David Haye/Nikolai Valuev,not one of his better nights,we all have them AND yes i am Scottish
I'm old enough to remember Jim as a great fighter.
He is a terrible commentator, but tonight was a new low.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 21:02
by Khaosai-Galaxy
@markmcgee87 wrote:Do they think it's only casual fans watching who will believe everything they say, Watt and Halling were more cheerleaders than commentators
Hate to agree with the consensus, but I agree totally.
It was beyond biased.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 21:02
by 15829
I preferred Ed Robinson and Glenn on the red button
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 30 Mar 2013, 21:04
by milpool
It's OK, switch over to allegedly now and you can see Statler & Waldorf.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 07:21
by mullenman
jim watt should not have a job
his scorecards are never correct and he is awful at his job
retire him
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 12:03
by steve689
Not sure about the rest but I have noticed of late that his scorecards are often off the mark. Which I suppose calls into question what he's watching.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 12:06
by iamasadlittleboy
@markmcgee87 wrote:I preferred Ed Robinson and Glenn on the red button
This was oddly true, how can the "B team" be THAT much better than the "A team"? Ed was fantastic.
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 13:50
by housesecond
Sky plus only went to round 9 of bellew too. Not happy!
Re: Sky coverage
Posted: 31 Mar 2013, 13:53
by broomy7s
Halling & Watt really need to go and I haven't even listned to last nights effort yet. Darke & smigga i'd like to see.