Page 1 of 2

allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:07
by 15829
Just announced there showing the Macao show and the Rigo Donaire fight, great work by BN well worth the cost of a pint a week

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:08
by pyenest77
Totally agree.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:10
by Ratchet Exits Nu
@markmcgee87 wrote:Just announced there showing the Macao show and the Rigo Donaire fight, great work by BN well worth the cost of a pint a week

Allegedly inna dis!

What a comeback!

Matchroom bettter watch out!

:OhYes:

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:13
by Gazmac81
i see there showing Trout vs Alvarez the same night as London Bill on 20th

Defo looking value over coming months

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:17
by The Insider
Fair play to them for getting the overseas big fights. It may be more a case of necessity though with their dwindling stable of late.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 09:47
by The 1bangkid
Even with all there problems allegedly is great for boxing in the UK.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 10:18
by earsjohn
MachoMan09 wrote:Grabbing up the overseas action is the way to go. Why bother with the hassle of putting on your own shows when there are plenty of other people who'll put on shows for you?
Genuine question - how many new subscribers will be moved to open their wallets for Rocky Martinez v Diego Magdaleno or rigondeaux v donaire? They are fine additions that will please the existing subscriber base, but surely not the types of cards to attract new subs?

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 10:21
by iamasadlittleboy
earsjohn wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:Grabbing up the overseas action is the way to go. Why bother with the hassle of putting on your own shows when there are plenty of other people who'll put on shows for you?
Genuine question - how many new subscribers will be moved to open their wallets for Rocky Martinez v Diego Magdaleno or rigondeaux v donaire? They are fine additions that will please the existing subscriber base, but surely not the types of cards to attract new subs?
Wouldn't Viloria v Estrada + Penalosa bros + Shiming be a bigger draw than the Martinez v Magdaleno bout?

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 10:29
by ScottDetonator
The channel had a lot of doubters when it first came out (myself included) but you can't argue with the schedule now.

Fantastic that they've added Donaire v Rigondeaux and Alvarez v Trout, worth the monthly fee alone.

The only gripe is the picture quality. Rios v Alvarado was FOTY but the picture quality we received was like watching an old VHS tape.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 10:30
by earsjohn
iamasadlittleboy wrote:
earsjohn wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:Grabbing up the overseas action is the way to go. Why bother with the hassle of putting on your own shows when there are plenty of other people who'll put on shows for you?
Genuine question - how many new subscribers will be moved to open their wallets for Rocky Martinez v Diego Magdaleno or rigondeaux v donaire? They are fine additions that will please the existing subscriber base, but surely not the types of cards to attract new subs?
Wouldn't Viloria v Estrada + Penalosa bros + Shiming be a bigger draw than the Martinez v Magdaleno bout?
Marginally perhaps. How many people are there in the UK who know who Brian Viloria is but don't already subscribe? And is there any proof that there will be an explosion in interest in Boxing in China on the back of Shiming?

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 14:11
by The 1bangkid
:TU:
ScottDetonator wrote:The channel had a lot of doubters when it first came out (myself included) but you can't argue with the schedule now.

Fantastic that they've added Donaire v Rigondeaux and Alvarez v Trout, worth the monthly fee alone.

The only gripe is the picture quality. Rios v Alvarado was FOTY but the picture quality we received was like watching an old VHS tape.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:03
by chad
earsjohn wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:Grabbing up the overseas action is the way to go. Why bother with the hassle of putting on your own shows when there are plenty of other people who'll put on shows for you?
Genuine question - how many new subscribers will be moved to open their wallets for Rocky Martinez v Diego Magdaleno or rigondeaux v donaire? They are fine additions that will please the existing subscriber base, but surely not the types of cards to attract new subs?
Not many people would sign up for one or two events. It's about delivering value and quality for money. Remember there is no long term commitment. Sign up and you can cancel within 30 days. For example someone signing up to the channel tomorrow will be treated to a fine collection of events over their 30 days:

Saturday 6th - Zou Shiming v Eleazar Valenzuela
Saturday 6th - Brian Viloria v Juan Francisco Estrada
Saturday 6th - Wilfredo Vazquez Jr. v Yasutaka Ishimoto
Saturday 6th - Roman Martinez v Yasutaka Ishimoto
Friday 12th - Yaqub Kareem v Paul Butler
Saturday 13th - Nonito Donaire v Guillermo Rigondeaux
Saturday 20th - Nathan Cleverly v Robin Krasniqi
Saturday 20th - Dereck Chisora v Andrej Pala
Saturday 20th - Liam Walsh v Scott Harrison
Saturday 20th - Austin Trout v Saul "Canelo" Alvarez
Saturday 27th - Amir Khan v Julio Diaz
Saturday 27th - Deontay Wilder v Audley Harrison
Saturday 27th - Sergio Martinez v Martin Murray
Saturday 4th - Floyd Mayweather Jr. v Robert Guerrero
Saturday 4th - Abner Mares v Daniel Ponce de Leon
Saturday 4th - J'Leon Love v Gabriel Rosado

Plus expect Danny Garcia v Zab Judah and Juergen Braehmer v Tony Averlant to be shown on a delay. Wladimir Klitschko v Francesco Pianeta on the 4th May is reportedly in the works too. Put it this way, Boxrec have 7 male 5 star fights listed over the next 30 days. 6 of them will be on allegedly! That is a massive seal of approval, in terms of the quality of action on the channel, from Boxrec.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:17
by leforge
The channel is great for hardcore fan. Is there enough of them!

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:22
by leforge
The Dark Destroyer wrote:
leforge wrote:The channel is great for hardcore fan. Is there enough of them!
How much does buying the rights to fights cost? There isn't many channels lining up to buy them.
Overseas fights will vary obvious they are getting lots last minute so they will be cheaper.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:30
by Final round
Image

April looks fornicating awesome!
£1 a fight. :bag: :bag: :box: :box: :bag: :bag: :box: :box:

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:30
by chad
leforge wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:
leforge wrote:The channel is great for hardcore fan. Is there enough of them!
How much does buying the rights to fights cost? There isn't many channels lining up to buy them.
Overseas fights will vary obvious they are getting lots last minute so they will be cheaper.
They can't be too outrageous. Remember when Premier Sports started broadcasting in 2009 it wasn't long until they where snapping up the rights to fights featuring Lucian Bute, Erik Morales, Shane Mosley and Felix Sturm.

allegedly will probably have a set price in terms of their long term content deal with Golden Boy. It had been suggested that allegedly have been working on a similar deal with Top Rank. Signs of a long term deal are looking good, especially with all the recent confirmed Top Rank bills.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:35
by leforge
It's great they showing them but they need more uk fights as the channel only going to attract the hardcore for overseas fights! And judging from not all of us subscribe! How many on here are using streams?

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:37
by chad
Final round wrote:Image

April looks effing awesome!
£1 a fight. :bag: :bag: :box: :box: :bag: :bag: :box: :box:
With SKY Box Office charging £17.95 PPV for Wrestlemania, and suggestions that Froch Vs. Kessler II will be the same price, you totally can't argue with the value for money you get with allegedly.

The great news is allegedly HD will be with us by September. Downside to this is expect to pay a couple of pounds more for the HD version.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:40
by chad
leforge wrote:It's great they showing them but they need more uk fights as the channel only going to attract the hardcore for overseas fights! And judging from not all of us subscribe! How many on here are using streams?
Maybe it's time for allegedly to reach our to Hatton Promotions and Mick Hennessy?

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:43
by 15829
How many hardcore fans don't subscribe because they don't like Frank

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:46
by Final round
chad wrote:
leforge wrote:It's great they showing them but they need more uk fights as the channel only going to attract the hardcore for overseas fights! And judging from not all of us subscribe! How many on here are using streams?
Maybe it's time for allegedly to reach our to Hatton Promotions and Mick Hennessy?
Yeah I'd like to see Hatton or Hennessy onboard, and I'm willing to pay a couple more quid for HD.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:53
by leforge
chad wrote:
Final round wrote:Image

April looks effing awesome!
£1 a fight. :bag: :bag: :box: :box: :bag: :bag: :box: :box:
With SKY Box Office charging £17.95 PPV for Wrestlemania, and suggestions that Froch Vs. Kessler II will be the same price, you totally can't argue with the value for money you get with allegedly.

The great news is allegedly HD will be with us by September. Downside to this is expect to pay a couple of pounds more for the HD version.
They been saying since start! I think chad you believe everything you read & here! Best is to wait & see!

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:55
by leforge
Final round wrote:
chad wrote:
leforge wrote:It's great they showing them but they need more uk fights as the channel only going to attract the hardcore for overseas fights! And judging from not all of us subscribe! How many on here are using streams?
Maybe it's time for allegedly to reach our to Hatton Promotions and Mick Hennessy?
Yeah I'd like to see Hatton or Hennessy onboard, and I'm willing to pay a couple more quid for HD.[/quot

Who hatton got left now? Murray & buckland are on next fight!

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 15:59
by ScottDetonator
@markmcgee87 wrote:How many hardcore fans don't subscribe because they don't like Frank
Know what you are saying Mark but not watching Saul Alvarez v Austin Trout or Nonito Donaire v Rigondeaux live and having the option to record, just because you don't like the guy who owns the TV station, seems pretty fruitless.

Re: allegedly

Posted: 04 Apr 2013, 16:01
by Final round
leforge wrote:
Who hatton got left now? Murray & buckland are on next fight!
True mate, also there's still Rabchenko , Quigg and Dickens and Towers.