BoxRec

Just seen E.Hearn tweet too Brian rose and bobby rimmer that Brian had rose 9 places in the box rec ratings
This worries me the box rec ratings are not official in any way shape or form and do not effect the governing bodies ratings
I have tons of respect for b.hearn and box rec as a website but .......................(Edward) tut tut

Because a top promoter should not be tweeting a Internet site ratings when it's not got any true bearing

I'm not trying too argue with you , it's a joke look at wba ,WBC rankings and so on not this site
I like and repect box rec but what I say is true

The Dark Destroyer wrote:

1 nut wrote:I'm not trying too argue with you , it's a joke look at wba ,WBC rankings and so on not this site
I like and repect box rec but what I say is true

Have either of those put out revised rankings since last night? I doubt it. Just looked at the tweet, he doesn't claim anything in the tweet, it's just a picture. No idea why you've got a problem with it.

I get the feeling that he thinks there's something sinister about it.

columbo wrote:

The Dark Destroyer wrote:

1 nut wrote:I'm not trying too argue with you , it's a joke look at wba ,WBC rankings and so on not this site
I like and repect box rec but what I say is true

Have either of those put out revised rankings since last night? I doubt it. Just looked at the tweet, he doesn't claim anything in the tweet, it's just a picture. No idea why you've got a problem with it.

I get the feeling that he thinks there's something sinister about it.

eddie is going to buy boxrec like golden boy bought the ring and strategically place his fighters higher up whilst getting rid of all the decent writers and get some thats more company friendly in, and then to do the opposite of the ring and launch a magazine edition of boxrecnews

Have either of those put out revised rankings since last night? I doubt it. Just looked at the tweet, he doesn't claim anything in the tweet, it's just a picture. No idea why you've got a problem with it.[/quote]
I get the feeling that he thinks there's something sinister about it.[/quote]
eddie is going to buy boxrec like golden boy bought the ring and strategically place his fighters higher up whilst getting rid of all the decent writers and get some thats more company friendly in, and then to do the opposite of the ring and launch a magazine edition of boxrecnews[/quote]

Im assuming that's sarcasm

He did what? This is a fornicating travesty. Hanging is too good for this bastard.

1 nut wrote:Just seen E.Hearn tweet too Brian rose and bobby rimmer that Brian had rose 9 places in the box rec ratings
This worries me the box rec ratings are not official in any way shape or form and do not effect the governing bodies ratings
I have tons of respect for b.hearn and box rec as a website but .......................(Edward) tut tut

BoxRec ratings are free from political rankings and are far more accurate.

...wait....don't most promoters and US TV companies put weight in to rankings of a magazine owned by a promoter?

columbo wrote:Have either of those put out revised rankings since last night? I doubt it. Just looked at the tweet, he doesn't claim anything in the tweet, it's just a picture. No idea why you've got a problem with it.

I get the feeling that he thinks there's something sinister about it.[/quote]
eddie is going to buy boxrec like golden boy bought the ring and strategically place his fighters higher up whilst getting rid of all the decent writers and get some thats more company friendly in, and then to do the opposite of the ring and launch a magazine edition of boxrecnews[/quote]

Im assuming that's sarcasm [/quote]
indeed

iamasadlittleboy wrote:...wait....don't most promoters and US TV companies put weight in to rankings of a magazine owned by a promoter?

Yes, but the Ring ratings are actually very good. Just coz DLH owns it, doesn't mean he messes with the ratings.

Who owns BoxRec?

MarkMcBurney wrote:Who owns BoxRec?

Rolf harris.

columbo wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:Who owns BoxRec?

Rolf harris.

*deletes bookmark*

Two little boys indeed.

L.C wrote:He did what? This is a effing travesty. Hanging is too good for this bastard.

DD

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:...wait....don't most promoters and US TV companies put weight in to rankings of a magazine owned by a promoter?

Yes, but the Ring ratings are actually very good. Just coz DLH owns it, doesn't mean he messes with the ratings.

Donaire and Broner in the top 10 P4P would suggest they (the ratings, not the fighters) aren't "very good", decent yes but just as poor in some cases as every other ranking system.

A promoter goes on twitter to boast about his fighters moving up the ratings of some boxing website?


Good lord, the times we live in.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:...wait....don't most promoters and US TV companies put weight in to rankings of a magazine owned by a promoter?

Yes, but the Ring ratings are actually very good. Just coz DLH owns it, doesn't mean he messes with the ratings.

Have a read at Nigel Collins thoughts on your theory mate, eye opening

Surley rose has to fight Sergey Rabchenko next for the euro title. Rabchenko already called him out a while ago and with hatton without a tv deal it should be an easy fight to make. Hopefully he dosent go the WBO euro/interncontential bs route. If this fight is not made you have to feel as though hearn/rose is dodging him and trying to find an alternative route around him to the top for no other reason other than they dont think they can beat him.

I would strognly recommend he does dodge him.
Only one result there. Rabchenko by stoppage - body shot.

Boxrec rankings are okay but theyre far from perfect.

Audley winning Prizefighter then going above David Price was hilarious.

Chris W 1982 wrote:Boxrec rankings are okay but theyre far from perfect.

Audley winning Prizefighter then going above David Price was hilarious.

Is that true?? I was just about to comment that Boxrec rankings probably had more relevance (not importance) than the world bodies, but if thats the case, maybe not!

Im just waiting for the day a fighter goes on twitter to brag about moving up in Horse's British PFP rankings.

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Im just waiting for the day a fighter goes on twitter to brag about moving up in Horse's British PFP rankings.

They take notice of them! Paul Smith used to get really stressed out by our Horse!

mickey1975 wrote:

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Im just waiting for the day a fighter goes on twitter to brag about moving up in Horse's British PFP rankings.

They take notice of them! Paul Smith used to get really stressed out by our Horse!

Doesn't Paul Smith just take everything to heart though...