Page 1 of 1

Broner v Paulie on allegedly

Posted: 10 May 2013, 07:07
by leforge
Great news fight on uk tv!

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 09:14
by pyenest77
Brilliant new. I had a look on the website the other day & was bemoaning the lack of fights on there, but just been on now & the schedule looks like it is filling up quite nicely.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 09:37
by Ratchet Exits Nu
Gwannn, Bunny Man!

:yay:

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 09:38
by MarkMcBurney
Shame, was hoping Sky would pick it up.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:01
by Kilburn
Great news. I wish Sky would just pack in with boxing to be honest.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:05
by jameswilson
MarkMcBurney wrote:Shame, was hoping Sky would pick it up.
How many non UK/non Matchroom fighter shows have they picked up in the last year out of interest?

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:09
by forcefraser
You can`t beat the bunny. He delivers time and time again.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:22
by MarkMcBurney
jameswilson wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Shame, was hoping Sky would pick it up.
How many non UK/non Matchroom fighter shows have they picked up in the last year out of interest?
Very few.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:25
by jameswilson
MarkMcBurney wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:Shame, was hoping Sky would pick it up.
How many non UK/non Matchroom fighter shows have they picked up in the last year out of interest?
Very few.
Strange isn't it. allegedly must surely be bidding more (surely Sky must be trying to get some of them too) and thus must be making good money from showing all these US and German bills that they get in. Fair play to them.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 10:36
by MarkMcBurney
jameswilson wrote:Strange isn't it. Allegedly channel must surely be bidding more (surely Sky must be trying to get some of them too) and thus must be making good money from showing all these US and German bills that they get in. Fair play to them.
I can only remember one Vegas fight not involving a British fighter or Matchroom fighter in the last year or so; can't even remember who it was.

I don't think Sky give a shit about boxing outside of their deal with Matchroom, which is a shame because their HD channels are phenomenal.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 11:02
by dbf
Doesn't allegedly have a deal with Golden Boy and gets a preference on all their shows.

Hopefully the whole Chisora Wilder fiasco hasn't jeopardised this

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 11:48
by MightyWarrior
Sky can't afford the fights, as they have to spend the cash on sending Adam and Johnny over to Madrid first class, so they can spend a few days there and interview Andy Murray.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 12:14
by Final round
allegedly the best channel on television.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 12:15
by ThereByTheGrace
Good on the channel. Judging by the tone on here I think people are starting to have a lil more sympathy for Bunny competing with the permatan essex boy and his Sky love in.

I just hope the fans get the best value in the end!

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 14:56
by Ratchet Exits Nu
forcefraser wrote:You can`t beat the bunny. He delivers time and time again.
Indeed I do!

Image

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 14:58
by Ratchet Exits Nu
MightyWarrior wrote:Sky can't afford the fights, as they have to spend the cash on sending Adam and Johnny over to Madrid first class, so they can spend a few days there and interview Andy Murray.
Indeed!

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 10 May 2013, 16:26
by MarkMcBurney
I have nothing against the channel, if money was no object I would subscribe but I don't think it's really acceptable in this day & age that they charge £10 for a service with no HD channel.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 11 May 2013, 08:09
by Ratchet Exits Nu
MarkMcBurney wrote:I have nothing against the channel, if money was no object I would subscribe but I don't think it's really acceptable in this day & age that they charge £10 for a service with no HD channel.
I did hear they are going HD, they need to keep the price at £10.00 though.

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 11 May 2013, 08:39
by digzee
Final round wrote:Allegedly channel the best channel on television.
Agree 100%

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 11 May 2013, 08:55
by jimcook
think this thread should have been titled "who can stick their tongue furthest up allegedlys arse"

Re: Broner v Paulie on Allegedly channel

Posted: 11 May 2013, 15:39
by Ratchet Exits Nu
jimcook wrote:think this thread should have been titled "who can stick their tongue furthest up allegedlys arse"
And the winner is...............................................jimcook.

Congrats!

:TU: