Loaded Tv Pull plug on boxing
Posted: 21 May 2013, 00:45
Been told loaded have pulled the plug on boxing (shame) 
It's a shame, because that's the things us boxing nerds want to see.warriorbox wrote:Can't see Allegedly channel picking up the small UK shows.
Why wouldn't small UK shows not generate new subscribers? Its not a channel for the casual fan per se, its a dedicated boxing channel so its only real chance is to get the avid boxing fan to subscribe and (more importantly) to keep that subscriber once they've got him.warriorbox wrote:It wouldn't surprise me to see the Sky EPG on the market in the next 6 months. They built a channel for men, which mainly has a load of women chatting about rubbish - what man wants to watch that? Might be different if the women had a braincell between them, but I don't want to watch it and my misses doesn't want to watch it, so don't know what audience they intend to capture. Nuts TV was actually better, which is, well, nuts.
In terms of 'live boxing' it was never going to work, the production costs are too high, and without having a Prizefighter type show, they would never get the average punter watching. If they are going the MMA route, they probably see this as the core audience of the magazine, and much easier to get the average punter watching - which may well be true.
Can't see Allegedly channel picking up the small UK shows, it won't bring in new subscribers, and the US shows where they pick up won't be costing much.
Ok, sounds like you know your stuff and I'm just guessing.Clint Magnum wrote:Why wouldn't small UK shows not generate new subscribers? Its not a channel for the casual fan per se, its a dedicated boxing channel so its only real chance is to get the avid boxing fan to subscribe and (more importantly) to keep that subscriber once they've got him.warriorbox wrote:It wouldn't surprise me to see the Sky EPG on the market in the next 6 months. They built a channel for men, which mainly has a load of women chatting about rubbish - what man wants to watch that? Might be different if the women had a braincell between them, but I don't want to watch it and my misses doesn't want to watch it, so don't know what audience they intend to capture. Nuts TV was actually better, which is, well, nuts.
In terms of 'live boxing' it was never going to work, the production costs are too high, and without having a Prizefighter type show, they would never get the average punter watching. If they are going the MMA route, they probably see this as the core audience of the magazine, and much easier to get the average punter watching - which may well be true.
Can't see Allegedly channel picking up the small UK shows, it won't bring in new subscribers, and the US shows where they pick up won't be costing much.
Small hall shows showing the up and coming pros starting their careers will introduce new boxers while they can still afford them, improve the promoter's fighter's exposure to a larger audience and would negate the endless repeats on the channel at the current time. The promoters won't lose on ticket sales as the vast majority of the audience won't live local to the show and if they do its improving the show's exposure for future ticket sales.
The business model employed by loaded is sound, they just sucked at the production stage.
Surely a very significant proportion of the hardcore boxing fans that would be interested in watching the small hall shows are either already subscribing to BN or have made a decision not to?Clint Magnum wrote:Why wouldn't small UK shows not generate new subscribers? Its not a channel for the casual fan per se, its a dedicated boxing channel so its only real chance is to get the avid boxing fan to subscribe and (more importantly) to keep that subscriber once they've got him.warriorbox wrote:It wouldn't surprise me to see the Sky EPG on the market in the next 6 months. They built a channel for men, which mainly has a load of women chatting about rubbish - what man wants to watch that? Might be different if the women had a braincell between them, but I don't want to watch it and my misses doesn't want to watch it, so don't know what audience they intend to capture. Nuts TV was actually better, which is, well, nuts.
In terms of 'live boxing' it was never going to work, the production costs are too high, and without having a Prizefighter type show, they would never get the average punter watching. If they are going the MMA route, they probably see this as the core audience of the magazine, and much easier to get the average punter watching - which may well be true.
Can't see Allegedly channel picking up the small UK shows, it won't bring in new subscribers, and the US shows where they pick up won't be costing much.
Small hall shows showing the up and coming pros starting their careers will introduce new boxers while they can still afford them, improve the promoter's fighter's exposure to a larger audience and would negate the endless repeats on the channel at the current time. The promoters won't lose on ticket sales as the vast majority of the audience won't live local to the show and if they do its improving the show's exposure for future ticket sales.
The business model employed by loaded is sound, they just sucked at the production stage.