Page 1 of 1

Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 05:01
by forcefraser
I had a bunch of mates round for the boxing on Saturday. Top night and a great fight with Froch v Kessler.

However, one astute observer, not a boxing fan to be fair, oted something that I have not noticed before. This mate is from Belarussia and he saw that Eddie Hearn had no visible ear lobes. In his country this means that a man is not to be trusted. "A lobeless man is a fox with cunning, a tricky animal" as he put it.

My experience with lobes and whether they are related to trustworthiness is pretty limited, but there is no denying the fact that Eddie certainly lacks depth in the lobe department.

I have always found Hearn, although slick and wide, to be genuinely interested in his boxers and the sport. This lobe issue has cast a shadow of doubt over proceedings and I am now directionless in my assement of young Hearn.

Do the lobes tell a story? or is it just an old belarussian wives tale?

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 06:25
by Parson Cross
Khan has a bone infection affecting his jaw.
That's why he can't trust taking a shot on it.
Purdy has a cream cake obsession.
Damn these imperfections.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 08:53
by palooka
forcefraser wrote:I had a bunch of mates round for the boxing on Saturday. Top night and a great fight with Froch v Kessler.

However, one astute observer, not a boxing fan to be fair, oted something that I have not noticed before. This mate is from Belarussia and he saw that Eddie Hearn had no visible ear lobes. In his country this means that a man is not to be trusted. "A lobeless man is a fox with cunning, a tricky animal" as he put it.

My experience with lobes and whether they are related to trustworthiness is pretty limited, but there is no denying the fact that Eddie certainly lacks depth in the lobe department.

I have always found Hearn, although slick and wide, to be genuinely interested in his boxers and the sport. This lobe issue has cast a shadow of doubt over proceedings and I am now directionless in my assement of young Hearn.

Do the lobes tell a story? or is it just an old belarussian wives tale?
I've no frontal lobe.

If your mate knows all about head shapes etc get him round the next time Valuev boxes and see what he says then.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:01
by forcefraser
How does one post pictures on here? It is proving beyond my skills.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:21
by SNG
It's definitely bollocks.

Image

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:22
by SNG
palooka wrote: I've no frontal lobe.
That explains so much.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:26
by palooka
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:27
by SNG
palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 09:28
by palooka
SNG wrote:
palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.
Ah; so that's what a frontal lobe is for.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 12:17
by chad
Image

Image

Image

I'd trust Eddie ahead of any of the above well lobed men! Especially if it came to baby sitting.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 16:35
by kevo
Image

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 27 May 2013, 20:23
by kevo
Just been discussing the whole earlobe situation on Twitter with Mr Hearn himself. Apparently it's 'all the rage'.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 28 May 2013, 04:24
by forcefraser
kevo wrote:Just been discussing the whole earlobe situation on Twitter with Mr Hearn himself. Apparently it's 'all the rage'.

Good work Kevo. We will get to the bottom of this lobe situation.

I thought about blaming Groves, but on closer inspection I see that Richard "The Secret" Williams is at fault here.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 28 May 2013, 06:38
by J
do you trust evander holyfield?

he had lobes but they got chewed off..what then?

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 28 May 2013, 08:48
by desperados
J wrote:do you trust evander holyfield?

he had lobes but they got chewed off..what then?
your ear anatomy is a little off.

Re: Lobeless Hearn

Posted: 28 May 2013, 10:00
by Final round
SNG wrote:
palooka wrote:
SNG wrote:It's definitely bollocks.

Image
that's not Eddie Hearn pal, though he's much better looking and with his lovely lobes he must be very trustworthy.
Er....I know. I was showing that Warren has lobes and isn't particularly trustworthy, so the theory is nonsense.
That's lobe'l if I've ever heard it release the legal hounds Wazza