Page 1 of 2
Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 26 Jun 2013, 16:01
by ALI
There's a lot of them out there: from plain stupid, to greedy, corrupt, delusional, egotistical, phsycopathic, pathological, love to showboat or just a few pence short of a pound, boxing really does has its fair share of plonkers.
Jose Sulaiman and Oscar De La Hoya are two real twats that i never place any value on a single word that ever leaves their mouths. Tyson Fury is a few fries short of a happy meal but bless the man, he's entertaining in a strange sort of way. Adrien Broner is fast becomming the biggest bell end to have laced a pair of gloves, and Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
They come in many different guises, i've not even scraped the surface. What others out there are worth a mention?
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 26 Jun 2013, 16:04
by Bleak
What was that "Crocodile" Fitch" role in boxing, apart from jumping out the way at that Lewis Weigh in????
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 03:05
by TJ77
Ive got to say Degale is a bit of a plum bag .
Fury
Kevin Mitchell for not capitalising on his talent .
Same goes for funtime frankie.
Adam Smith tops the tree he is a knob
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 05:02
by ajwesty13
i have to say on recent performance mcguigan is proving hes bit of a bellend... and if Garcia ducks mathysse then hes already more of a bellend than i think he is.... (i have genuine dislike for talenless duckers like garcia and bradley)
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 05:14
by Lenny
Stan Johnson
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 05:16
by jonnyyorkshu
broner,what a nib end he is.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 05:36
by iamasadlittleboy
ajwesty13 wrote:i have to say on recent performance mcguigan is proving hes bit of a bellend... and if Garcia ducks mathysse then hes already more of a bellend than i think he is.... (i have genuine dislike for talenless duckers like garcia and bradley)
Wait a minute, the topic was "biggest idiots"-Garcia, if he can worm his way around the Matthysse bout might be a bellend but he's also a pretty smart one. Only an idiot would willingly get in the ring with that monster!
Bradley a ducker? Hmm....guy who's been in with Holt, Peterson, Alexander, Pacquiao and Provodnikov....
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 06:00
by gobbles
iamasadlittleboy wrote:ajwesty13 wrote:i have to say on recent performance mcguigan is proving hes bit of a bellend... and if Garcia ducks mathysse then hes already more of a bellend than i think he is.... (i have genuine dislike for talenless duckers like garcia and bradley)
Wait a minute, the topic was "biggest idiots"-Garcia, if he can worm his way around the Matthysse bout might be a bellend but he's also a pretty smart one. Only an idiot would willingly get in the ring with that monster!
Bradley a ducker? Hmm....guy who's been in with Holt, Peterson, Alexander, Pacquiao and Provodnikov....
To be fair, no one expected Provodnikov to be a difficult fight. Just because he boxed so badly, hardly makes it brave matchmaking
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 06:20
by iamasadlittleboy
gobbles wrote:iamasadlittleboy wrote:ajwesty13 wrote:i have to say on recent performance mcguigan is proving hes bit of a bellend... and if Garcia ducks mathysse then hes already more of a bellend than i think he is.... (i have genuine dislike for talenless duckers like garcia and bradley)
Wait a minute, the topic was "biggest idiots"-Garcia, if he can worm his way around the Matthysse bout might be a bellend but he's also a pretty smart one. Only an idiot would willingly get in the ring with that monster!
Bradley a ducker? Hmm....guy who's been in with Holt, Peterson, Alexander, Pacquiao and Provodnikov....
To be fair, no one expected Provodnikov to be a difficult fight. Just because he boxed so badly, hardly makes it brave matchmaking
...and the others?
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 08:17
by deadpan
The thread title sounds like one of those 54 minute rip-off clips DVDs for the Xmas market. Presented by Danny Dyer.
"Get a load of this muppet".
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 08:52
by danconnollyeire
Soliman is the biggest contriditary, lying, sneaky idiot going
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 08:55
by ajwesty13
gobbles wrote:iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Wait a minute, the topic was "biggest idiots"-Garcia, if he can worm his way around the Matthysse bout might be a bellend but he's also a pretty smart one. Only an idiot would willingly get in the ring with that monster!
Bradley a ducker? Hmm....guy who's been in with Holt, Peterson, Alexander, Pacquiao and Provodnikov....
To be fair, no one expected Provodnikov to be a difficult fight. Just because he boxed so badly, hardly makes it brave matchmaking
Ok i cant really put bradley in the same as garcia he has fought bigger names but bradley is an unpopular bellend and he did duck khan.... It doesnt take much brains though to know mathyesse will crush almost anyone... But it was the bravado Garcia was giving out at the Peterson v Mathyesse fight ... That gives more ammunition for him to stay in the bellend category....
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 09:08
by n1ebf
You know....we got straps...gotta have cash....A-B.....always ballin'....you know......yeah, we got cash, gotta have straps..you know..

Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 09:09
by davie
Suppose it depends what you mean by idiot.
A bit stupid or a bit of a w@nk3r
if it's the first i'm going to throw one in here that might seem a bit random
Scott quigg always strikes me as being a bit slow. Kind of like one of those guys that fought on 8 fights longer than they should have and allowed his head to be used as a punch bag at the end of his career. And he's still in his early twenties.
That maybe seems harsh as he seems a nice enough kid and I like watching him fight, but he doesn't strike me as being particularly bright.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 09:10
by davie
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:You know....we got straps...gotta have cash....A-B.....always ballin'....you know......yeah, we got cash, gotta have straps..you know..

Aye he tops the bill for the sports biggest bell ends
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 09:44
by dbflex
davie wrote:Suppose it depends what you mean by idiot.
A bit stupid or a bit of a w@nk3r
if it's the first i'm going to throw one in here that might seem a bit random
Scott quigg always strikes me as being a bit slow. Kind of like one of those guys that fought on 8 fights longer than they should have and allowed his head to be used as a punch bag at the end of his career. And he's still in his early twenties.
That maybe seems harsh as he seems a nice enough kid and I like watching him fight, but he doesn't strike me as being particularly bright.
He's very intelligent in my opinion, just has what I think is a mild speech impediment. I believe this may affect his confidence and composure during interviews, especially on tv.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 09:55
by desperados
ALI wrote:Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
he's not far off having the tools. If he had a iron chin he'd have a fantastic shot at a UD over fighters like Floyd and Bradley.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 10:20
by Deserter
Must admit it's been a long, long time since I've ever wanted to see a fighter get a proper beatdown but I do want to see someone put it on Broner - a long, prolonged drubbing followed by a KO would somehow strike me as natural justice at work... no wish for him to suffer long-term damage, but just force some humility on him...
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 14:06
by handsofstone
Ricardo Mayorga
![[icon_twisted.gif] :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 14:12
by palooka
desperados wrote:ALI wrote:Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
he's not far off having the tools. If he had a iron chin he'd have a fantastic shot at a UD over fighters like Floyd and Bradley.
And to be fair he doesn't need an iron chin to get through 1 rounds with those 2; if he managed Maidana then he may squeek through.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 14:17
by hurlock
TJ77 wrote:Ive got to say Degale is a bit of a plum bag .
Fury
Kevin Mitchell for not capitalising on his talent .
Same goes for funtime frankie.
Adam Smith tops the tree he is a knob
Gavin posts on here as you know & will read your silly back handed compliment.
I can't see where he has gone wrong??
L.welter he would of made quick transition to word level @ welter he needs to grow & is & is taking the the right fights IMO to prepare himself for top flight
longjevity is important & Gavin will remain @ welter & if he looks good v vassel I think people will sit up
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 14:20
by palooka
I didn't think I'd say it as I really admired him as a boxer and how he conducted himself but Kostya Tzsyu went down in my estimation the other week by not pulling Lebedev out of the bout; the man was in hospital for 5 days with the damage I read. Winning a bout can't be worth that, Dennis may not be the same again.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 16:46
by ALI
desperados wrote:ALI wrote:Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
he's not far off having the tools. If he had a iron chin he'd have a fantastic shot at a UD over fighters like Floyd and Bradley.
Agreed, but he does'nt have an iron chin, does he.
By the same token, if Malagnagi had Liston's left hook...............
It does'nt work like that i'm afraid.
Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 16:51
by keithmoonhangover
ALI wrote:There's a lot of them out there: from plain stupid, to greedy, corrupt, delusional, egotistical, phsycopathic, pathological, love to showboat or just a few pence short of a pound, boxing really does has its fair share of plonkers.
Jose Sulaiman and Oscar De La Hoya are two real twats that i never place any value on a single word that ever leaves their mouths. Tyson Fury is a few fries short of a happy meal but bless the man, he's entertaining in a strange sort of way. Adrien Broner is fast becomming the biggest bell end to have laced a pair of gloves, and Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
They come in many different guises, i've not even scraped the surface. What others out there are worth a mention?
Nice to see so many positive threads getting started.

Re: Boxings biggest idiots
Posted: 28 Jun 2013, 16:54
by palooka
keithmoonhangover wrote:ALI wrote:There's a lot of them out there: from plain stupid, to greedy, corrupt, delusional, egotistical, phsycopathic, pathological, love to showboat or just a few pence short of a pound, boxing really does has its fair share of plonkers.
Jose Sulaiman and Oscar De La Hoya are two real twats that i never place any value on a single word that ever leaves their mouths. Tyson Fury is a few fries short of a happy meal but bless the man, he's entertaining in a strange sort of way. Adrien Broner is fast becomming the biggest bell end to have laced a pair of gloves, and Amir Khan still thinks he's got the style to beat Mayweather.
They come in many different guises, i've not even scraped the surface. What others out there are worth a mention?
Nice to see so many positive threads getting started.

hahaha
the two real twats makes the shitty weather bearable.