BoxRec

Well there we go then. Surely Haye can't pass up the challenge now. Can't believe for one second that Fury will do a winner takes all challenge though!

Fury has called his bluff ...lets see what Mr Haye has to say now

I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.

palooka wrote:I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.

Of course it has. All this 80/20 and 50/50 split talk is just done to hype it up. It's signed and sealed and will be announced next week is my prediction.

Can you imagine what the press conferences will be like for this one! Utter comedy!

Happy Slapper wrote:

palooka wrote:I talked to Tysons' father in law this morning and he was under the impression that the Haye bout had been agreed, signed for in September.

Of course it has. All this 80/20 and 50/50 split talk is just done to hype it up. It's signed and sealed and will be announced next week is my prediction.

At last some sense and it'll be worth watching; I can't see Tyson winning but he'll get paid a lot and will put up a show.

As if Haye is going to agree to a winner takes all. It wouldnt be because he doesnt believe he could win the fight either. He knows that in heavyweight boxing he could get clipped and that's it. Haye is very shrewd when it comes to the financial aspect of boxing so you cant blame him.

2 other facts:

That's an IKEA sofa
White socks are always a bad thing

No chance of 'winner takes all' after the board vetoed that same deal with Groves & Degale.

Roars Like Me wrote:2 other facts:

That's an IKEA sofa
White socks are always a bad thing

There's nothing wrong with an ikea sofa

MarkMcBurney wrote:No chance of 'winner takes all' after the board vetoed that same deal with Groves & Degale.

Exactly, Robert Smith has a very strong stance on that. This is Fury on damage control. He was crying and calling David unprofessional for telling the public why the fight isn't on. His pride has been hurt. David posted himself that he offered 50/50 and Fury turned it down. Fury admitted he turned down 50/50 on Sky news as he wanted a 80/20 split.

Now he's saying the 50/50 was agreed but David wont sign. Two days ago he was saying he turned down a 50/50 split because he wanted 80/20 on Sky news.

Tyson Fury is talking absolute bs.

I hope it's a done deal ! My hotel has been booked for over two weeks

Peter Furys take on it .
http://www.BS.com/peter-fury-i ... -us--67110

I always suspected he was a few pence short of a pound, but offering Haye a winner takes all removes any doubt.

Haye should hold him to this.

ALI wrote:I always suspected he was a few pence short of a pound, but offering Haye a winner takes all removes any doubt.

Haye should hold him to this.

Could it be that fury is just a very confident heavyweight with an unbeaten record?

MachoMan09 wrote:Come on, guys. Read what Peter has to say and then have a word with yourselves. There was a tacit agreement weeks ago, everything else is crossing the ts and tickling the balls.

I like Fury but this has Haye WKO1 maybe 2 written all over it. Easiest money since Haudley.

You dont think Fury is any better than fraudley wow just fcuking wow

Audley Harrison would get in the ring with anyone.

mrpedigree wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote:Come on, guys. Read what Peter has to say and then have a word with yourselves. There was a tacit agreement weeks ago, everything else is crossing the ts and tickling the balls.

I like Fury but this has Haye WKO1 maybe 2 written all over it. Easiest money since Haudley.

You dont think Fury is any better than fraudley wow just fcuking wow

You're so far up Fury's arse you can probably taste his chewing gum!

Will people still dismiss Fury as a pile of rubbish after he stops Haye?

They'll probably find a way.

columbo wrote:You're so far up Fury's arse you can probably taste his chewing gum!

You don't think Fury is better than Harrison?

Horse wrote:

columbo wrote:You're so far up Fury's arse you can probably taste his chewing gum!

You don't think Fury is better than Harrison?

No I think he is better than Harrison but that doesnt mean he couldnt be knocked out earlier than Audley was. Audley is ultra defensive whereas Tyson takes more risks and thus is more open to being hit and thus knocked out.

MachoMan09 wrote:Come on, guys. Read what Peter has to say and then have a word with yourselves. There was a tacit agreement weeks ago, everything else is crossing the ts and tickling the balls.

I like Fury but this has Haye WKO1 maybe 2 written all over it. Easiest money since Haudley.

This, this and this.

Haye is Britain's Broner i.e. far too overhyped.

Fury's going to smash him to pieces, it's going to be great.

Horse wrote:Haye is Britain's Broner i.e. far too overhyped.

Fury's going to smash him to pieces, it's going to be great.

Haye is an arrogant cock at times but he's still an talented arrogant cock! Wladimir never looked in complete control against Haye and he does most opponents.