BoxRec

Dunno if you saw their last video with barry Hearn but there was some allegedly questions and answers in there, now video is removed and kugans tweeted due to legal reasons its gone.


Kugan Cassius iFILM @KuganCassius 11m
Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to the threat of legal proceedings against us. #boxing
View details ·


Kugan Cassius iFILM @KuganCassius 10m
Myself and James are unable to make any further comment on this, but will do in due course if necessary. Thank you.
View details ·



“@KuganCassius: Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to threat of legal proceedings against us” laughable

The tweets in question....


Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 12m
Unfortunately we have had to remove our latest video on the channel due to the threat of legal proceedings against us. #boxing


Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 11m
Myself and James are unable to make any further comment on this, but will do in due course if necessary. Thank you.

Kugan Cassius iFILM ‏@KuganCassius 7m
Myself and James pride our work on credibility, impartiality and honesty. Today we were put in a position which makes US question this.

Crazy ..

There's an interview in this month's BN with W@rren and he does come across as both thin skinned and ruthless. A guy wrote something on an internet site W@rren didn;t like and despite the guy telling W@rren he was sorry and skint, W@rren still wants to literally bankrupt him.

The bloke who has threatened legal action is a joke. They need to tell him to fornicate off. Cant throw his weight around when he hears something he doesn't like. Especially as that is all it is, a threat - he would never be successful. He just picks on those weaker than him.

Its obvious who HE is btw.

Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.

Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.

columbo wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.

Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.

Oh right, yeah no doubt. Will be embarrassing for Fr@nk.

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.[/quote

Isnt it public knowledge that allegedly and sports network is in the red? Im sure i seen a press release somewhere. All this does is make the hardcore fan like warren even less going after kuggs like this. You carnt imagine hearn doing the same thing

columbo wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

columbo wrote:Im guessing the argument from FW side if it is him of course is that I think someone said that Barry had stated that FW's business is in ruins? If that isnt true that is probably slanderous and could affect his business in terms of fighters wanting to join his stable...... I doubt it's Kugan and James that the issue is with. It's just their video.

I have a feeling Barry Hearn is very very familiar with the accounts of FW. I doubt he would have said something about his business if it weren't true, especially with FW's track record of legal action.

Im not saying he's wrong as I dont know either way. Im just saying I imagine that's what the core of the legal threat is.

Oh right, yeah no doubt. Will be embarrassing for Fr@nk.[/quote]

It's entertaining to watch though! Haha. I hope FW doesnt ban Ifilm from his shows though as firstly you want to see interviews from as many shows as possible and secondly it's not going to benefit them banning a youtube channel that has a big boxing fanbase.

rio wrote:
Isnt it public knowledge that Allegedly channel and sports network is in the red? Im sure i seen a press release somewhere. All this does is make the hardcore fan like warren even less going after kuggs like this. You carnt imagine hearn doing the same thing

Absolutely, it will all be available at companies house won't it.

And no you're right they wouldn't. Frank is old school, he tries to bully his way through, clearly doesn't give a fornicate about public image.

As he stated in BM, no one mentions his new company, w promotions, made 2.5million last year. He will be ok. Bet he's well up for the BJS fight! (And Liam Smith).

So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?

I'm sure I heard that the owner of rainham steel had bought half of BN.

The topic question is "has allegedly threatened ifilm london with legal action ?"

Without knowing any insider details about this at all, the law of averages suggests that the answer to the question is yes

When two tribes go to war a point is all that you can score.

kugan and james do go work
i hope this does not restrict them in the job that they do

MachoMan09 wrote:.

Shit yourself there i see ;;-)

MachoMan09 wrote:

columbo wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote:.

poo yourself there i see ;;-)

No. I decided it was a cheap shot.

Haha fairplay.

MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?

W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.

mickey1975 wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?

W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.

No it was Sports Network wasnt it ? Im guessing the New company is free of any previous companies debts , Unless im completely off the mark and it is all now resolved ???

damianhucker1 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:So W Promotions made £2.5m? Maybe he can pay Calzaghe the £1.8m he still owes him then?

W Promotions doesn't owe Joe money.

No it was Sports Network wasnt it ? Im guessing the New company is free of any previous companies debts , Unless im completely off the mark and it is all now resolved ???

Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.

MarkMcBurney wrote:
Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.

For the things he has done, and the way he has conducted his business he gets an extremely easy ride from most.

DMA1987 wrote:

MarkMcBurney wrote:
Of course. Old company goes bust owing millions, directors set up new company with a different name doing the same business with mostly the same people...

Frank W@rren is morally bankrupt, if not financially.

For the things he has done, and the way he has conducted his business he gets an extremely easy ride from most.

I agree. As a child of the 80's I'll always be grateful to Frank for some brilliant nights in front of ITV involving people like Benn, Eubank, Collins & Bruno; but things like that always leave a bit of a sour taste, especially give that, love them or hate them, Matchroom have done it the 'right way' and are a bloody successful company. Granted, as Barry says, that's not all down to Boxing but you've got to admire their success.