Page 1 of 1

How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 13 Aug 2013, 08:16
by thefrenchjourneyman
And Queensbury league boxers in general ? Who are the best and want they turn professional ? I'm not sure I understand the conduct of this competition ...

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 13 Aug 2013, 08:29
by WelshJack
I thought it was an Australian thing, but seeing an interview and Francis Warren talked about it I couldn't believe it, but it still doesn't interest me at all.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 13 Aug 2013, 09:02
by lefty
Im struggling to understand the thread title to be honest......

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 13 Aug 2013, 12:48
by damianhucker1
billy bessey wrote:Bourne isnt bad very good at unlicensed level he's a bit of a beast in the ring but would struggle to get in the uk top 15 in the pros so if he's selling tickets then he's probably better off staying where he is

Wouldnt Bourne be a Cruiserweight in reality if he turned pro or would he struggle to do the weight ?

Not the Biggest of Heavyweights really is he .

He blew one of my heavyweights away in around 30 seconds on a queensbury show .

To answer the question on how Queensbury are perceived id say the only thing they have is the tv deal , they pay poorly and the tv is the only thing to attract any boxer to them , so theyre not very big even in the unlicensed/white collar circuit , let alone on the grand scheme of things .

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 02:39
by dbflex
WelshJack wrote:I thought it was an Australian thing, but seeing an interview and Francis Warren talked about it I couldn't believe it, but it still doesn't interest me at all.
Are you sure he wasn't talking about Queensbury Promotions rather than QBL?

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 08:20
by WelshJack
dbflex wrote:
WelshJack wrote:I thought it was an Australian thing, but seeing an interview and Francis Warren talked about it I couldn't believe it, but it still doesn't interest me at all.
Are you sure he wasn't talking about Queensbury Promotions rather than QBL?
To be honest I am very confused by the whole thing.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 10:19
by Callowland
Queensbury Boxing League is a well run, well honed, efficient organisation.

I would tip Mike Bourne to give Anthony Joshua all the trouble in the world.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 11:31
by Callowland
It's the Bourne Identity factor.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 12:30
by Callowland
billy bessey wrote:
Callowland wrote:Queensbury Boxing League is a well run, well honed, efficient organisation.

I would tip Mike Bourne to give Anthony Joshua all the trouble in the world.

Can I have a bit I what you're smoking please? :TU:
If we sat down and had a chat, you will realise we have actually met, and it was fortuitous for you.

You will also realise Mike has considerable power, and I truly believe better boxing ability than Joshua.

I may well be wrong, but that is my opinion.

As a former heavyweight, you should know the essence of power.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 13:14
by damianhucker1
Callowland wrote:
billy bessey wrote:
Callowland wrote:Queensbury Boxing League is a well run, well honed, efficient organisation.

I would tip Mike Bourne to give Anthony Joshua all the trouble in the world.

Can I have a bit I what you're smoking please? :TU:
If we sat down and had a chat, you will realise we have actually met, and it was fortuitous for you.

You will also realise Mike has considerable power, and I truly believe better boxing ability than Joshua.

I may well be wrong, but that is my opinion.

As a former heavyweight, you should know the essence of power.

Get real , If he was of that level he wouldnt be on Queensbury league shows , he would already be pro (unless of course hes either not medically able to or he cant do tickets , of which i get the impression the latter isnt the case ) .

He can hit hard , against guys who arent on that level , who is Mikes best win against ?

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 16:58
by palooka
You're putting yourself down there without cause Billy; they don't give ABA titles away, they are earned, if you couldn't punch your weight you'd have gotten nowhere.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 16 Aug 2013, 19:32
by Callowland
If you would have seen me box you'd know I haven't got a clue about power. Boxing is all about levels and at the level Mike is at he's a beast similar to how Price was at British level but he soon got found out when he stepped up just as I see happening with Mike just like yourself I maybe wrong. But I'd bet a pound to a penny we will never get to find out. Who are you by the way? Where did we meet?[/quote]

My exact words were that I think he would give him all the trouble in the world. For all I know, the bell could ring and he gets chinned with the first punch. However, I think Joshua was very lucky to become Olympic Champion. Even a former ex pro and Finchley ABC boxer mate of mine said that. He was getting that Gold medal come what may.

If there was a PM box on this site, I would let you know who i am and you would understand why I wish to remain with my nom de plume.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 08:13
by lillywhite14
I know a couple who fight in the league, willing lads but limited. Standard unlicensed stuff.

Amazed its on Eurosport. Seems a little strange to say the least!

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 08:43
by Callowland
MachoMan09 wrote:
Callowland wrote:Queensbury Boxing League is a well run, well honed, efficient organisation.

I would tip Mike Bourne to give Anthony Joshua all the trouble in the world.
Is that you, Ross?
It is definitely not Ross, but I have respect for Ross as a matchmaker. The QBL is at an embryonic stage, and I would question some of the remarks about the quality of the majority of the contests.

Although it doesn't have the pro tag in front of it, I would genuinely say the quality is above average, and is better quality than a pro prospect running after a journeyman all night long, which is the back stop of a pro undercard. Your 50/50 fight is normally your main event.

I can say that with complete conviction.

Re: How Mike Bourne is considered in England ?

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 09:00
by Callowland
As I said above, from what I've seen the fights are generally very well matched and entertaining. It's good sport in the truest sense of the word. I stand by my comment that the overall quality (read: ability) of the fighters is low.[/quote]

Fair enough. I see your point. The ability would need to be tested against those of a higher degree. Hopefully the level of ability will increase over time.