Page 1 of 1

Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 18:09
by jameswilson

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 20:38
by billy nelson
No mention of Ricky Burns shocking ha ha

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 20:41
by palooka
The world doesn't spin around you and yours Billy

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 21:33
by expe
Does seem a bit unusual that he'd mention Quigg and Brook who aren't fighting for a while and Khan who doesn't have a fight confirmed yet he'd miss out Burns who fights in 3 weeks.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 21:35
by lefty
expe wrote:Does seem a bit unusual that he'd mention Quigg and Brook who aren't fighting for a while and Khan who doesn't have a fight confirmed yet he'd miss out Burns who fights in 3 weeks.
I thought he did mention it at the end. Because I remember Kugan saying how Pacquaio had piped up saying Beltran will win! *Beltran being Manny's chief sparring partner for a long time*

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 17 Aug 2013, 21:39
by expe
Interesting that he mentioned Kevin Mitchell's out in America right now.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 10:14
by jackukmma
I think there has been a serious lack of promotion for the Burns fight. Hearn did bring him up in this interview

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 11:35
by lefty
expe wrote:Interesting that he mentioned Kevin Mitchell's out in America right now.
I think he was only out there to support Barker. I dont think he was out there for any other reason to be fair.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 11:43
by TJ77
columbo wrote:
expe wrote:Interesting that he mentioned Kevin Mitchell's out in America right now.
I think he was only out there to support Barker. I dont think he was out there for any other reason to be fair.
Same trainer same promoter hardly surprising he was there.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 13:31
by expe
TJ77 wrote:
columbo wrote:
expe wrote:Interesting that he mentioned Kevin Mitchell's out in America right now.
I think he was only out there to support Barker. I dont think he was out there for any other reason to be fair.
Same trainer same promoter hardly surprising he was there.
I know that just surprised he got a visa, he's had issues in the past.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 14:44
by magnus
I know that just surprised he got a visa, he's had issues in the past.[/quote]

Getting a visa to travel to the USA for a visit isn't that difficult, you just need to get the wheels in motion early, as it can take a while. I think you need to apply for a copy of your conviction history, then book an appointment at the US embassy for an interview. I don't think you can generally do this short notice.

Getting a working visa may be more difficult.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 14:59
by King Tubby
Didn't Martin Murray have an interview recently about a visa? How did it go?

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 15:33
by sweetscience
Its a problem gettin in USA with convictions if u tell them

I know plenty of people who been in jail n been for holiday an not mentioned it

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 15:38
by jameswilson
King Tubby wrote:Didn't Martin Murray have an interview recently about a visa? How did it go?
I'll ring the US embassy and find out for you.

Re: Eddie Hearn's latest iFilm interview.

Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 16:15
by magnus
sweetscience wrote:Its a problem gettin in USA with convictions if u tell them

I know plenty of people who been in jail n been for holiday an not mentioned it
If people are willing to take the risk and gamble their family holiday or whatever then that's up to them. There's a risk you'll be the one they do a random check on and then be refused entry. You don't have to have been jailed either, the criteria used to say something like "arrested and/or convicted" (that was a few years back, it may have changed).