Tommy Morrisson vs . Larry Holmes
Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 07:01
What happened in this fight?
I think he ends it a little earlier.gilgamesh wrote:Holmes KO 9 or 10
Maybe. He definitely winsRover wrote:I think he ends it a little earlier.gilgamesh wrote:Holmes KO 9 or 10
Agreed. Hope someone doesn't pick Morrison here.gilgamesh wrote:Maybe. He definitely winsRover wrote:I think he ends it a little earlier.gilgamesh wrote:Holmes KO 9 or 10
Ketchel wrote:I pick Morrison.......to lose in 7.
That's way past prime Holmes; I assumed the OP was referring to primes. The Holmes of the McCall fight v. prime Morrison...tough one to call.polecateddy wrote:Morrison could beat the post-Holyfield version I think. Closer fight than against Foreman though.
Holmes. Please don't classify any version of Morrison as Sweet Pea.tennessee wrote:what about the 226 lbs. sweetpea version that fought Foreman?
Choosing a version of Holmes that Morrison could beat is better than prime for prime ...which is just silly!Rover wrote:That's way past prime Holmes; I assumed the OP was referring to primes. The Holmes of the McCall fight v. prime Morrison...tough one to call.polecateddy wrote:Morrison could beat the post-Holyfield version I think. Closer fight than against Foreman though.
The Nielsen fight was years after McCall, right? And McCall was quite close.HomicideHenry wrote:The only time this could have taken place would have been in the 1990's. The prime 1970's and 1980's Holmes would have stopped Tommy in four or five rounds. Holmes in his comeback was pretty remarkable, having defeated Ray Mercer in a one sided decision and all, but his outing with Holyfield wasn't as significant as Foreman's was. Holmes would also lose to Oliver McCall and Brian Nielsen. I'd pick Holmes to win it, only because Morrison wasn't always the most dependable guy. Morrison was very inconsistant in his performances. He would look like a million dollars against someone like Razor Ruddock, Joe Hipp, and George Foreman, and then would go life and death with Ross Purrity or get blown away by Michael Bentt. It all depends on what version of Tommy Morrison decided to show up.
That be true on both counts, but let's be honest here. Concerning the McCall fight, the man was a tremendous underdog against Lewis and won on a freak kayo. McCall eeked out a victory over Holmes, etc. So is McCall really a guy to point to and say Holmes was still that damn good? Personally, I dont think so. Holmes was on the way out (and clearly by the time he fought Nielsen). If Morrison fought the Holmes of the McCall fight onward, I'd be making Morrison a live underdog. I wouldnt say he could kayo Holmes or anything like that, but I think Morrison could eek out a decision over Holmes by that time.Rover wrote:The Nielsen fight was years after McCall, right? And McCall was quite close.HomicideHenry wrote:The only time this could have taken place would have been in the 1990's. The prime 1970's and 1980's Holmes would have stopped Tommy in four or five rounds. Holmes in his comeback was pretty remarkable, having defeated Ray Mercer in a one sided decision and all, but his outing with Holyfield wasn't as significant as Foreman's was. Holmes would also lose to Oliver McCall and Brian Nielsen. I'd pick Holmes to win it, only because Morrison wasn't always the most dependable guy. Morrison was very inconsistant in his performances. He would look like a million dollars against someone like Razor Ruddock, Joe Hipp, and George Foreman, and then would go life and death with Ross Purrity or get blown away by Michael Bentt. It all depends on what version of Tommy Morrison decided to show up.
By the time of the Nielsen fight Morrison had gotten HIV and was done (I know about his couple comeback fights; I'm speaking in terms of fighting at the top level). Morrison of Ruddock fight v. Holmes of McCall fight is a close call.HomicideHenry wrote:That be true on both counts, but let's be honest here. Concerning the McCall fight, the man was a tremendous underdog against Lewis and won on a freak kayo. McCall eeked out a victory over Holmes, etc. So is McCall really a guy to point to and say Holmes was still that damn good? Personally, I dont think so. Holmes was on the way out (and clearly by the time he fought Nielsen). If Morrison fought the Holmes of the McCall fight onward, I'd be making Morrison a live underdog. I wouldnt say he could kayo Holmes or anything like that, but I think Morrison could eek out a decision over Holmes by that time.Rover wrote:The Nielsen fight was years after McCall, right? And McCall was quite close.HomicideHenry wrote:The only time this could have taken place would have been in the 1990's. The prime 1970's and 1980's Holmes would have stopped Tommy in four or five rounds. Holmes in his comeback was pretty remarkable, having defeated Ray Mercer in a one sided decision and all, but his outing with Holyfield wasn't as significant as Foreman's was. Holmes would also lose to Oliver McCall and Brian Nielsen. I'd pick Holmes to win it, only because Morrison wasn't always the most dependable guy. Morrison was very inconsistant in his performances. He would look like a million dollars against someone like Razor Ruddock, Joe Hipp, and George Foreman, and then would go life and death with Ross Purrity or get blown away by Michael Bentt. It all depends on what version of Tommy Morrison decided to show up.
He legitimately beat Mercer.SamWise72 wrote:I've seen it suggested here that Larry got jobbed against Nielsen, and also that he got a gift against Mercer. I've not seen either fight to comment.
That's true. I think even a match with the early 90's Holmes who was able to compete with Holyfield and upset Ray Mercer would probably be about a 50/50 match against Morrison even at his best.polecateddy wrote:Choosing a version of Holmes that Morrison could beat is better than prime for prime ...which is just silly!Rover wrote:That's way past prime Holmes; I assumed the OP was referring to primes. The Holmes of the McCall fight v. prime Morrison...tough one to call.polecateddy wrote:Morrison could beat the post-Holyfield version I think. Closer fight than against Foreman though.
Agreed on his left jab.IRLangmaid25 wrote:For me Holmes grinds the Duke down with that left jab for the first 7/8 rounds and then finishes him off somewhere around round 9/10. For me Larry Holmes had one of the best left jabs ever?