Page 1 of 1
September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 12:54
by WelshJack
Which card is better? Sky or allegedly?
Re: September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 13:04
by mullenman
allegedly card is way better and a rather unfair questions as it has many of allegedly top men and to be fair to eddie it is looking like the worst card he has ever put on for sky but massive blockbusters will make up for such a poor card
its ok eddie, one bad card now and then is ok once the fans get the big fights they want
(which the fans are getting and going to get this year)
Re: September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 13:10
by Parson Cross
Who gives a shit which people consider better or worse ? I personally wouldn't miss Derry v Curtis for anything.
Re: September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 13:37
by WelshJack
mullenman wrote:Allegedly channel card is way better and a rather unfair questions as it has many of Allegedly channel top men and to be fair to eddie it is looking like the worst card he has ever put on for sky but massive blockbusters will make up for such a poor card
its ok eddie, one bad card now and then is ok once the fans get the big fights they want
(which the fans are getting and going to get this year)
I think it is a fairly good card with 3 50/50 fights.
Re: September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 13:40
by WelshJack
Parson Cross wrote:Who gives a poo which people consider better or worse ? I personally wouldn't miss Derry v Curtis for anything.
Just interested to see what people are looking forward to the most. I really can't split them I am edging towards sky as I am a fan of Rocky Fielding and Erick Ochieng
Re: September 21st
Posted: 27 Aug 2013, 13:42
by DMA1987
Hard to split either really, don't think either are great cards. Though I would probably rather watch Matthews v Woodhouse over BJS v Ryder, though again, there's nothing in it. Both great fights.