Page 1 of 1
Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 28 Aug 2013, 04:13
by Vladimir5555
I think it would be a good fight.I would give the victory Sidorenko,it is more physically strong fighter,and is better able to take a punch.Sidorenko by clear decision or later stoppage.
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 28 Aug 2013, 07:42
by Rover
Sidorenko by decision.
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 28 Aug 2013, 17:46
by Giancarlo
Sidorenko on points
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 28 Aug 2013, 18:23
by world ranked
I'm not sure Kirillov could win a decision in Germany. So Sidorenko
would probably win by split decision
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 28 Aug 2013, 21:01
by giacomino
Sidorenko deserved UD
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 29 Aug 2013, 23:45
by Rover
I should also note that, though Kirilov didn't do anything of note at bantam, I don't think it would be as much of a disadvantage (the fight's being at that weight) as it would v. Poonsawat.
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 30 Aug 2013, 05:20
by Vladimir5555
Rover wrote:I should also note that, though Kirilov didn't do anything of note at bantam, I don't think it would be as much of a disadvantage (the fight's being at that weight) as it would v. Poonsawat.
fornicate,I always thought that Kirillov played bantamweight division
. sorry :(
Re: Wladimir Sidorenko vs . Dmitry Kirillov
Posted: 30 Aug 2013, 16:17
by Rover
Vladimir5555 wrote:Rover wrote:I should also note that, though Kirilov didn't do anything of note at bantam, I don't think it would be as much of a disadvantage (the fight's being at that weight) as it would v. Poonsawat.
eff,I always thought that Kirillov played bantamweight division
. sorry :(
His main wwork (title, etc) was at 115.