Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post Reply
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by Rover »

I'd def take Espinosa at feather. Close call at bantam.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15549
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by giacomino »

Love me some Hasegawa at 118 but you're right, Espinosa's punch makes it a tough call. Am tempted to say Hasegawa something like 115-112, but Luisito's punch puts it up for grabs, IMO
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by Rover »

giacomino wrote:Love me some Hasegawa at 118 but you're right, Espinosa's punch makes it a tough call. Am tempted to say Hasegawa something like 115-112, but Luisito's punch puts it up for grabs, IMO
Yeah, I'll take Hasegawa in a close one...with trepidation.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by Giancarlo »

Hasegawa probably
teikken
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 13 Mar 2004, 00:09

Re: Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by teikken »

Rover wrote:I'd def take Espinosa at feather. Close call at bantam.
^agreed.

Espinosa is a devastating puncher, but at bantam not so much (tho he still put the lights out of Kaokor Galaxy!) as he often struggled to make weight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Luisito Espinosa v. Hasegawa at bantam and feather.

Post by Rover »

teikken wrote:
Rover wrote:I'd def take Espinosa at feather. Close call at bantam.
^agreed.

Espinosa is a devastating puncher, but at bantam not so much (tho he still put the lights out of Kaokor Galaxy!) as he often struggled to make weight.
Yeah he had weight issues cut still packed a dangerous punch.
Post Reply