BoxRec

Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

I`m not using the Cunningham fight as a guide to how this fight goes, I`m more inclined to look at what Firtha and Pajkic did to him early on.

Sonnyboybollocks.

forcefraser wrote:I`m not using the Cunningham fight as a guide to how this fight goes, I`m more inclined to look at what Firtha and Pajkic did to him early on.

Sonnyboybollocks.

Well then are you not overlooking what Thompson & Wlad done to Haye ? Fury did KO both Firtha & Pajkic

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

you again?

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

What are these 'aspects'. Fury couldn't brutilise McDermott. Have you actually watched Fury's fight. What is this 'power' and 'speed' you're on about. He looked awfully slow against Cunnigham

Edit: the fact you said Fury is more skilled than Lennox means you should never comment on boxing again and proves you are either a Fury or a complete troll

If Fury had the edge in power he'd have knocked himself out cold that time he caught himself with his own uppercut.

I couldnt honestly believe what I just read. Definately has a surname of Fury!

i see this going like Baer v Carnera

danconnollyeire wrote:

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

What are these 'aspects'. Fury couldn't brutilise McDermott. Have you actually watched Fury's fight. What is this 'power' and 'speed' you're on about. He looked awfully slow against Cunnigham

Edit: the fact you said Fury is more skilled than Lennox means you should never comment on boxing again and proves you are either a Fury or a complete troll

Lennox Lewis was always just a jab right-hand fighter who had very limited movement and looked like he had two left feet, i suggest you take a look at Tyson Fury vs Vinny Maddalone fight were Fury looks incredible with fantastic boxing skills, throwing 4 & 5 punch combo's, switiching punch from head to body and back to head, Fury moves forwards, backwards, side to side while throwing fast accurate punches and averaging 60-70 punches per round. Lennox averaged 25-30 punches per round. Lennox was a incredible powerful puncher but simply did not have the boxing ability which Fury has. Lennox could not fight going forward and when he tried he looked awkward and uncomfortable, whereas Fury looks like George Foreman in his prime going forward. Take a look at Tyson Fury vs Marcel Zeller fight in which Fury looks incredible while throwing every punch in the book, Fury looks like a giant Thomas Hearns and never in my life after watching over 30,000+ boxing fights can i ever recall seeing such a big man as Fury having such great boxing ability... if you can tell me a fighter who does have Fury's boxing ability i would be pleased to hear it.

Endorsing kitchen equipment?

danconnollyeire wrote:

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

What are these 'aspects'. Fury couldn't brutilise McDermott. Have you actually watched Fury's fight. What is this 'power' and 'speed' you're on about. He looked awfully slow against Cunnigham

Edit: the fact you said Fury is more skilled than Lennox means you should never comment on boxing again and proves you are either a Fury or a complete troll

Fury won the British title in only his 8th pro fight and has now only had 21 fights. i can recall Lennox Lewis fighting Dan Murphy & Ossie Ocasio in his 12th pro fight yet looking anything but world class. Lennox won the European title off 50yr old Jean Chanet and looked terrible in doing so. Tyson Fury is now the consummate professional in his last 5 fights and a genuine World class contender. to claim otherwise is simply Hating on the guy.

danconnollyeire wrote:

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

you again?

yes me again, the guy who talks boxing. unlike yourself who only comes on the forum to Troll & ridicule as your knowledge of boxing is zero

if you want lose your money then bet on Sonny(box2)

sonnyboyx2 wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote:

sonnyboyx2 wrote:Yes i have a feeling when all aspects are looked at in this fight with David Haye, That Tyson Fury could easily do what Big George done to both Joe Frazier & Ken Norton. Tyson Fury could brutalize David Haye within 2rds. Fury has every conceivable advantage in this match-up just like Foreman had. Height, Reach, Speed, Power, agility, aggression, boxing ability, undefeated, punches per round output, Home-advantage. David Haye is being vastly overrated for what he has done at heavyweight and IMO Fury will walk right through him, knocking him from pillar-to-post because Haye is a natural Cruiserweight and Fury is the biggest Heavyweight on the planet. 99% of those boxing fans who tip Haye to win are basing their whole argument (Haye included) on Fury getting floored by Steve Cunningham. But if you look at the knock down Fury was off balance and standing on only one foot as the punch landed. Fury got up immediately and won the round. Fury is going to be 40lbs heavier and 6ins taller than Haye. Fury is by far the most skillful Big man to ever step into a boxing ring, even better than Riddick Bowe & Lennox Lewis who neither could throw combinations as fast or as good as Tyson Fury. Wlad & Vitali Klitschko cannot box anywhere near as skillful as what Tyson Fury can box. David Haye can only fight one way which is going backwards throwing a pot-shot.. David Haye don't stand a chance in this fight and Tyson Fury will make very very short work of him.

What are these 'aspects'. Fury couldn't brutilise McDermott. Have you actually watched Fury's fight. What is this 'power' and 'speed' you're on about. He looked awfully slow against Cunnigham

Edit: the fact you said Fury is more skilled than Lennox means you should never comment on boxing again and proves you are either a Fury or a complete troll

Lennox Lewis was always just a jab right-hand fighter who had very limited movement and looked like he had two left feet, i suggest you take a look at Tyson Fury vs Vinny Maddalone fight were Fury looks incredible with fantastic boxing skills, throwing 4 & 5 punch combo's, switiching punch from head to body and back to head, Fury moves forwards, backwards, side to side while throwing fast accurate punches and averaging 60-70 punches per round. Lennox averaged 25-30 punches per round. Lennox was a incredible powerful puncher but simply did not have the boxing ability which Fury has. Lennox could not fight going forward and when he tried he looked awkward and uncomfortable, whereas Fury looks like George Foreman in his prime going forward. Take a look at Tyson Fury vs Marcel Zeller fight in which Fury looks incredible while throwing every punch in the book, Fury looks like a giant Thomas Hearns and never in my life after watching over 30,000+ boxing fights can i ever recall seeing such a big man as Fury having such great boxing ability... if you can tell me a fighter who does have Fury's boxing ability i would be pleased to hear it.

Thank you for making my afternoon - parts of this made me laugh out loud, but I think the highlight was the concept of Fury as a giant Thomas Hearns.

that said the last person who i scoffed at with something similar was when they were posting that Pacman would destroy Hatton withing couple rounds

sonnyboyx2 wrote: yes me again, the guy who talks boxing. unlike yourself who only comes on the forum to Troll & ridicule as your knowledge of boxing is zero

Oh piss off Tyson we all know it's you

Maddalone? Seriously? The human heavy bag? When I box the heavy bag I look good, moving/switching

You think Fury is better than Lennox... Lennox could probably beat Fury now

Fury won the British title in only his 8th pro fight and has now only had 21 fights. i can recall Lennox Lewis fighting Dan Murphy & Ossie Ocasio in his 12th pro fight yet looking anything but world class. Lennox won the European title off 50yr old Jean Chanet and looked terrible in doing so. Tyson Fury is now the consummate professional in his last 5 fights and a genuine World class contender. to claim otherwise is simply Hating on the guy.

This is just not true. I'm sure you mean English title? And I'm fairly sure Matt Skelton achieved the same feat...

Gazmac81 wrote:that said the last person who i scoffed at with something similar was when they were posting that Pacman would destroy Hatton withing couple rounds

i was 100% confident at that time Pacquiao would destroy Ricky Hatton within a couple of rounds

sonnyboyx2 wrote:

Gazmac81 wrote:that said the last person who i scoffed at with something similar was when they were posting that Pacman would destroy Hatton withing couple rounds

i was 100% confident at that time Pacquiao would destroy Ricky Hatton within a couple of rounds

Well done Tyson

smoothmoves wrote:

Fury won the British title in only his 8th pro fight and has now only had 21 fights. i can recall Lennox Lewis fighting Dan Murphy & Ossie Ocasio in his 12th pro fight yet looking anything but world class. Lennox won the European title off 50yr old Jean Chanet and looked terrible in doing so. Tyson Fury is now the consummate professional in his last 5 fights and a genuine World class contender. to claim otherwise is simply Hating on the guy.

This is just not true. I'm sure you mean English title? And I'm fairly sure Matt Skelton achieved the same feat...

Fury may yet prove to be as good as Skelton, too. You've been watching a different fighter to me, Sonnyboy; the Fury I see has no advantages over Haye beyond height that he doesn't know how to use. He has heart, for sure, but he can't box, he didn't hit hard enough to trouble Cunningham and had to stop him by leaning on him, he's just not very good.

If anyone saw Tyson Fury on ringside he means business he wasn't laughing or joking and looked in good shape.

I give Fury a good chance in this but I think if he wins, it will be by boxing at length for the 12. He certainly won't blast Haye out. Don't think it was a coincidence that Fury's gunslinger approach to the Cunningham happened with Peter missing from the corner.
Had he been there wouldn't have thought Fury would have been as wild. Expect a chess match in this one, longer it goes the better Fury's chances are

It'll be good while it lasts and there is no way on earth that Tyson Fury turns into a massive puncher though I hope he wins.

Haye will KO Fury easily.