BoxRec

I'v had some people over-reacting over last nights decision. So I wondered what people think is boxings worst robbery this year? I don't think Burns v Beltran is for the record. I had it 115-112 to Beltran. Surely there are quite a few worse ones.

Your hair vs your scalp.

Fuentes "only" getting a draw with Fuentes. Travesty.

Fat Git wrote:Your hair vs your scalp.

Twat.

just this year then for me it would probably Murray v Martinez ... still think he did enough even with the bizare knock down not counted that would have given Murray the title for sure....

I had Murray ahead by fewer points than I had Beltran ahead personally.

I had Murray down by a point.

crusader wrote:I had Murray down by a point.

Think I had him ahead by 1.

Worst decision this year so far is allowing Tom Ford to join the forum.

jameswilson wrote:

crusader wrote:I had Murray down by a point.

Think I had him ahead by 1.

Even though Martinez was the busier but the scoring shots goes to Murray .. i had Murray just a head by a point but the knock down wouldve been the clincher...

I didn't think Murray's generally more effective shots outweighed Martinez's greater quantity in enough rounds, and only one knockdown was counted so I don't think a possibly blown call by the ref should be factored into how bad the decision was. I'd have no problems with a close win for Murray, but I disagree strongly that he was robbed.

Can you name 7 rounds that could not fairly have gone to Martinez?

.

Satchell vs. Butcher on the Price/Thompson 2 undercard. Thought Butcher strolled to the win, flooring Satchell in the process but the nod went the hometown boy 115-113 x2 and 115-114 I think. Thought Satchell looked shocked to get it.

crusader wrote:I didn't think Murray's generally more effective shots outweighed Martinez's greater quantity in enough rounds, and only one knockdown was counted so I don't think a possibly blown call by the ref should be factored into how bad the decision was. I'd have no problems with a close win for Murray, but I disagree strongly that he was robbed.

Can you name 7 rounds that could not fairly have gone to Martinez?

I think he was robbed but not with a slender 1 point lead as i I had Murray winning a good 6 rounds with a 10-8 but the fact that the second knockdown did not count even though there was clear evidence of a punch landed and the ref and new tech that helps ringside ref to over turn a decision and they decided for Murray had not landed a punch for that reason he was robbed.. Even Argentinian TV had Murray up by 1 without the knock down .. its narrow i know so you have a case for non robber which is fair enough

Realistic wrote:Worst decision this year so far is allowing Tom Ford to join the forum.

Although the right guy won, cards in the Eto/Porpramook were disgusting.

Dirk Kelly wrote:Satchell vs. Butcher on the Price/Thompson 2 undercard. Thought Butcher strolled to the win, flooring Satchell in the process but the nod went the hometown boy 115-113 x2 and 115-114 I think. Thought Satchell looked shocked to get it.

Great point where was all the fuss then , when the Scottish fighter never got the decision ?

That was hilarious when Bradley went down by delayed reaction to a punch in the first or second round by Provodnikov.

The ref called it a slip as Bradley got up and lurched around the ring Berbick style.

I thought the scores on Alvarez v Trout were pretty bad. Old Stanley had it by a landslide to Canelo. I thought Trout fought close to a draw.