Page 1 of 1

Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 12:14
by jameswilson
This fight would appear unlikely any time soon. But if the two were to square off in December how do you see it going?

I think from what I see the majority tend to lean towards Frampton however I really think Quigg has the edge. He has quite a bit of height on Frampton and also his shot selection and accuracy are excellent. He also appears to have a really decent amount of power.

It's a domestic clash I really hope happens in the next 18 months.

Discuss.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 12:24
by Counter-puncher
its a genuine 50/50 in my opinion, one of the closest (and best quality) all-British matchups (or potential matchups) since the likes of Rhodes-Moore, Barker-Macklin, etc.

I think Frampton has the slight edge in punch power, and I get the impression (albeit unsubstantiated) that Frampton holds a shot a bit better.

on the other hand like you say Quigg's shot selection is very good and i think he puts them together in combination a better than Frampton, who has seemed to be a little bit more one-punch-at-a-time from what I have seen.

i think their records match up very closely.

gun to head I'd go with Frampton but the margins here are very, ummm, marginal :TU:

if this got announced it's one of the very few fights i think i'd say I'd be there, wherever it was staged.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 14:50
by pyenest77
Very interesting fight & for me it pisses me that this will either never happen or wont happen for a long time.

Personally I go for Quigg. They are both unbeaten so its difficult to pick as neither if them have been in massive difficulty, but I just think that he would win probably on points
.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 14:58
by lefty
Id go with Frampton myself. I think Quigg has got a lot of ability himself but I have the feeling he's somewhat chinny. He was put down against Arthur and he was also put down against that that Villani who has a 22% KO percentage. Im not sure Quigg would of survived against the Martinez that Frampton fought for instance.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 15:12
by ajwesty13
i have too and fro'd from each camp of frampton and quigg ... i think quigg has the slight edge with boxing ability however Frampton has a better chin... theres so little between them.. it wont happen for a while and i dont blame both camps.... they are probably waiting til there is something more meaningful on the line which should bring about a much bigger purse and audience
:)

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 15:24
by jameswilson
columbo wrote:Id go with Frampton myself.
Yeah but who do you think would win a boxing match?

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:22
by DMA1987
Quigg never seems to rush. He just picks the right shots with quite brutal timing. I am slightly concerned about his chin against Frampton, but not enough to bet against him. I favour Quigg to eventually pick Frampton apart.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:24
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:Quigg never seems to rush. He just picks the right shots with quite brutal timing. I am slightly concerned about his chin against Frampton, but not enough to bet against him. I favour Quigg to eventually pick Frampton apart.
He has to beat Salinas first aswell though. That's going to be no walk in the park.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:28
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Quigg never seems to rush. He just picks the right shots with quite brutal timing. I am slightly concerned about his chin against Frampton, but not enough to bet against him. I favour Quigg to eventually pick Frampton apart.
He has to beat Salinas first aswell though. That's going to be no walk in the park.
I think there is every chance it will be.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:33
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Quigg never seems to rush. He just picks the right shots with quite brutal timing. I am slightly concerned about his chin against Frampton, but not enough to bet against him. I favour Quigg to eventually pick Frampton apart.
He has to beat Salinas first aswell though. That's going to be no walk in the park.
I think there is every chance it will be.
Have you watched Salinas?

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:40
by lefty
A little interview boxing news did with Salinas http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... cott-quigg and his wiki page about his amateur accomplishments http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoandri_Salinas

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:41
by DMA1987
Of course I've seen Salinas as fight. I honestly thought he would be a better pro than has turned out currently.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:44
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:Of course I've seen Salinas as fight. I honestly thought he would be a better pro than has turned out currently.
He hasnt fought anyone of any real note to gauge him properly though. Im not saying Quigg wont beat him, im just saying I doubt it will be easy.

Re: Scott Quigg and Carl Frampton

Posted: 13 Sep 2013, 16:46
by DMA1987
Good Cuban amateurs always come with a bit of a reputation attached to them, he hasn't looked close to special though in the pro ranks. But you are right pal, maybe his performances will rise with the level of competition. I am looking forward to finding out.