Froch v Groves undercard
Posted: 17 Sep 2013, 13:11
Did they announce any undercard fights at the press conference?
Barker wont be on it, I can tell you that for a start.ImAwesome wrote:Any more news on this? I can't see who they can get on this bill and they need some big fights with it being PPV. I feel this needs 3 big fights to warrant being PPV. Barker Vs ?????? and who else. Crolla is domestic level so there is no way he can be chief support for a PPV show, in fact i would be disappointed if Crolla is in the 3rd biggest fight of the bill.
If it had Barker vs Sturm and Crolla vs Beltran I'd snap it up. But it won't will it?mickey1975 wrote:Barker wont be on it, I can tell you that for a start.ImAwesome wrote:Any more news on this? I can't see who they can get on this bill and they need some big fights with it being PPV. I feel this needs 3 big fights to warrant being PPV. Barker Vs ?????? and who else. Crolla is domestic level so there is no way he can be chief support for a PPV show, in fact i would be disappointed if Crolla is in the 3rd biggest fight of the bill.
Any ideas what will be on it then? You can't have Froch v Groves which is effectively an 80/20 fight in Froch favour and then Crolla vs some unheard of European mixed in with a load of prospects vs bums like Joshua, Campbell etc. and sell it for £15.mickey1975 wrote:Barker wont be on it, I can tell you that for a start.ImAwesome wrote:Any more news on this? I can't see who they can get on this bill and they need some big fights with it being PPV. I feel this needs 3 big fights to warrant being PPV. Barker Vs ?????? and who else. Crolla is domestic level so there is no way he can be chief support for a PPV show, in fact i would be disappointed if Crolla is in the 3rd biggest fight of the bill.
That's exactly what they will do.ImAwesome wrote:
You can't have Froch v Groves which is effectively an 80/20 fight in Froch favour and then Crolla vs some unheard of European mixed in with a load of prospects vs bums like Joshua, Campbell etc. and sell it for £15.
X2 You better believe itMightyWarrior wrote:That's exactly what they will do.ImAwesome wrote:
You can't have Froch v Groves which is effectively an 80/20 fight in Froch favour and then Crolla vs some unheard of European mixed in with a load of prospects vs bums like Joshua, Campbell etc. and sell it for £15.
It will be that I bet, similar to Froch v Kessler tickets are sold and Eddie (and now Froch) clearly care more about the casuals PPV £ than boxing fans and for those they don't need a decent undercard just to hype the hell out of the Froch v Groves fight on Sky beforehand.ImAwesome wrote:Any ideas what will be on it then? You can't have Froch v Groves which is effectively an 80/20 fight in Froch favour and then Crolla vs some unheard of European mixed in with a load of prospects vs bums like Joshua, Campbell etc. and sell it for £15.mickey1975 wrote:Barker wont be on it, I can tell you that for a start.ImAwesome wrote:Any more news on this? I can't see who they can get on this bill and they need some big fights with it being PPV. I feel this needs 3 big fights to warrant being PPV. Barker Vs ?????? and who else. Crolla is domestic level so there is no way he can be chief support for a PPV show, in fact i would be disappointed if Crolla is in the 3rd biggest fight of the bill.
Boxing has been like that for years, it's not exclusive to Hearn. Promoters know that a lot of boxing fans will eventually cave and purchase a pay-per-view anyway, because they want to watch the fight anyway. They don't need to market at them. It's the casual fans, that watch one or two fights a year that they are trying to convince to buy fights. That's been they case for years, it's not something that Hearn invented.ste1983 wrote: It will be that I bet, similar to Froch v Kessler tickets are sold and Eddie (and now Froch) clearly care more about the casuals PPV £ than boxing fans and for those they don't need a decent undercard just to hype the hell out of the Froch v Groves fight on Sky beforehand.
Its only 6 weeks away! According to Derry, I cant see that one happening and that's a quick turn around for Quigg and Selby. Cant see them giving it to Flannigan either.Howard01 wrote:The way it's looking at the moment it will be Quigg defending his title, and Selby Vs Monroe, along with Crolla against somebody like Terry Flannigan.
Mitchell vs Mathews is also likely. Throw some Olympians on the bill and that will be that.