Page 1 of 1

Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:26
by prjm80
Should be a cracker

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:28
by lefty
This could be getting carried with the hype but the way Smith is looking I see him knocking fielding out.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:33
by Hagler2002
Smith would win easy IMO.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:34
by lefty
The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:36
by Tom Ford
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
As advertised.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:38
by Fortynineandout
Sooner or later Fielding has to step out of his comfort zone and fight a credible opponent.
The weight difference tonight was clear to see .
His opponent didn't look like a genuine super middle and fielding struggled to make the weight ? Easy nights work but an embarrassing match up for me.

Luke Blackledge has been calling him out for ages- as soon as Dodson pulled out he was putting himself forward at short notice but was avoided for the easy option.
There are good fights to be made and then we can see how good he is.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:43
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:46
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:48
by Andrew
Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:50
by lefty
Naandrew wrote:Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.
Is this thread about Paul or Callum? Haha.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:51
by expe
columbo wrote:
Naandrew wrote:Luke Blackledge won't be a walkover for Smith he held his own in Denmark, he loves a fight and will go to war with Smith.

Being honest I still wouldn't be suprised if Smith v Fielding happened for one reason.........money. It would be a big fight in Liverpool and at the echo arena I can't see any fight that would make Paul more money now.

He's at the back end of his career and will want to earn as much as he can before he bows out.
Is this thread about Paul or Callum? Haha.
Different people are talking about both.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:51
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?
You are an Oracle.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:53
by prjm80
Sorry the original post was about callum

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:53
by lefty
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:The guy Fielding is boxing tonight looks like utter dog turd http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Take it you didn't watch the fight?
Im watching the show from the copperbox and recording the sky show. Why, am I wrong then?
You are an Oracle.[/quote]

Nicest adjective ive ever had :lol:

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 16:58
by n1ebf
oracle isn't an adjective. I've never heard of a boxer described as utter dog turd on Boxrec before. What a respectful way of putting it.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 22 Sep 2013, 04:21
by Tommy Gunn13
It sounded to me last night that Fielding wants no part of Smigga,i could be wrong..

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 22 Sep 2013, 05:29
by mickey1975
Blackledge is not to be overlooked.

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 23 Sep 2013, 09:05
by hurlock
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:It sounded to me last night that Fielding wants no part of Smigga,i could be wrong..
Either did oliver Harrison & when they mentioned Callum he never looked interested & look worried saying he was happy to defend his commonwealth.
They don't seem confident at all rocky seems a nice kid but that won't get him far he would like to face Dodson to see where he is at.
I would much rather face Paul then Callum!! He holds the Lonsdale & I don't see him greater then domestic level at 12 st as for Callum the lad could fight for the British with in being a pro inside a year which to me says alot for his potential!!

Re: Smith v fielding

Posted: 26 Sep 2013, 07:19
by stesmith22
paul would win easy he is at a higher level
would love frankie gavin to fight kid gahie me thoughts ?