Page 1 of 3

Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 22:54
by gilgamesh
The undercard Klimov vs Crawford is about to start now.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:00
by JCS
Crawford wins the 1st.. no question.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:02
by gilgamesh
Definitely

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:02
by Tanzio
10-9 crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:03
by JCS
This is one of those fights that won't put my new score sheet to the test.

Klimov did a little better in the 2nd, I guess.

Crawford 20-18

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:04
by Tanzio
20-18 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:04
by Tanzio
The Provoglodyte

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:05
by gilgamesh
Yep. Crawford is another one of those guys in that it's absolutely essential that the other guy comes to brawl to make it entertaining in any way. In a boxing match it'll be a dull fight every time.

Crawford is clearly very skilled though. Doubtful Klimov wins a round here.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:08
by JCS
Crawford again.. 30-27

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:08
by JCS
Cotto looking soggier than usual.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:08
by Tanzio
The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:11
by JCS
yawn

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:12
by Baby Face Finster
I admire the skill of Crawford but this is one boring fight and not bound to do him any favours. Thank god this is only 10 rounds.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:13
by Tanzio
40-36 Crawford

I don't get why people do not enjoy watching a crawford work.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:13
by gilgamesh
Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:16
by Tanzio
Closer round but

50-45 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:17
by Tanzio
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:17
by JCS
I didnt see Klimov do a damn thing in the 5th.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:18
by gilgamesh
Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:The boo birds suck

30-27 Crawford
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated
So?

So is David Rodriguez.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:20
by Tanzio
Wait a minute, that was a clear KD this morning.

60-54 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:24
by Tanzio
70-63 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:24
by diddy
Crawford is an excellent boxer.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:25
by Tanzio
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
I totally get it. Crawford bores the sh*t out of me...I realize the irony of this comment when I'm one of the few defending Wlad's performance today :lol: , which was clearly more boring. But at least there's something at stake when Wlad fights.

Crawford I'm always just like "Meh whatever"...I know he'll probably be a top guy in the years to come.

But right now with these fights that should be on ESPN I don't give a sh*t.
Klimov is undefeated
So?

So is David Rodriguez.
And he is a good night of work.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:28
by JCS
Klimov did OK that round.. not sure he won it, but landed a few nice shots.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:29
by Tanzio
80-72 Crawford, but Klimov did land a couple of decent shots.