Page 1 of 1
Jake LaMotta Versus Bernard Hopkins
Posted: 07 Oct 2013, 22:26
by ThatOne
Discuss
Re: Jake LaMotta Versus Bernard Hopkins
Posted: 07 Oct 2013, 22:37
by gilgamesh
A great fight that I think either man could win. I'd give Hopkins the edge most of the time against the come forward Lamotta. That being said, Lamotta is tougher and a better fighter than probably any Middleweight that Hopkins ever beat so it's certainly not a sure thing.
I'd have to favor Hopkins by decision though, in a trilogy I think Jake would take at least one of them.
Re: Jake LaMotta Versus Bernard Hopkins
Posted: 09 Oct 2013, 10:38
by elmersalsa
The great Bernard Hopkins was more complete fighter than given credit for. He could box, take a punch, fight well inside as well as outside, great stamina, will and determination. The great Jake LaMotta was very good, tough as nails, but I don't think he beats B-Hop. B-Hop by decision.
Re: Jake LaMotta Versus Bernard Hopkins
Posted: 09 Oct 2013, 12:13
by ThatOne
elmersalsa wrote:The great Bernard Hopkins was more complete fighter than given credit for. He could box, take a punch, fight well inside as well as outside, great stamina, will and determination. The great Jake LaMotta was very good, tough as nails, but I don't think he beats B-Hop. B-Hop by decision.
I agree...