Page 1 of 1

FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 14:42
by lefty

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 14:49
by handsofstone
If Wazza is right and his fighters arent legally allowed to leave him,i bet he wishes his solicitors would get a move on and prove it before Ed takes his whole stable

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 15:59
by jackukmma
Same bully boy tactics as usual. He has a conflict of interest as both manager and promoter. Will end same way as Burns, bellew and numerous others that crossed over, warren will end up dropping the case as he doesn't have a leg to stand on

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 16:34
by hurlock
Frank fookin hAtes scousers haha! I find the man pretty vile with no class he bangs on about the bbbofc & when he was doing the Luxembourg gig he was slating them as only a ltd.co etc.
Eddy is a knight in shining armour & should strip josh of his mbe & take it for himself ha!

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:27
by JimJim2009
We're getting to the point where it is going to be quicker to list the fighters who haven't jumped camps, than those who have :D

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:31
by lefty
I'd like to see a charity boxing match between Frank and Eddie. Scratch that, Frank is a bit old for that so maybe one of his sons or Andy Ayling. I'd pay to watch that :OhYes:

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:33
by hurlock
Frank would be a dirty bar steward he would probably hopoatey Hearn into submission

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:34
by lefty
hurlock wrote:Frank would be a dirty bar steward he would probably hopoatey Hearn into submission
:lol:

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:44
by hurlock
Only reason I know about hopoatey is because of his heavyweight venture like the other rugby lad Donny Williams is it???

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 17:50
by iamasadlittleboy
hurlock wrote:Only reason I know about hopoatey is because of his heavyweight venture like the other rugby lad Donny Williams is it???
Sonny Bill

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 18:33
by DMA1987
Standard. Throw your weight around Frank, trouble is nobody gives a fornicate about you

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 18:43
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:Standard. Throw your weight around Frank, trouble is nobody gives a eff about you
You meant bar Columbo obviously :wink: :OhYes:

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 18:48
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Standard. Throw your weight around Frank, trouble is nobody gives a eff about you
You meant bar Columbo obviously :wink: :OhYes:
:D obviously. One day me and you will shoot the breeze about how much of a d-bag he is. One day.

Re: FW/Queensbury response to Stephen Smith situation

Posted: 11 Oct 2013, 18:53
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Standard. Throw your weight around Frank, trouble is nobody gives a eff about you
You meant bar Columbo obviously :wink: :OhYes:
:D obviously. One day me and you will shoot the breeze about how much of a d-bag he is. One day.
Haha to be honest it's not that I love FW by any stretch, it's just purely like I said before, im not totally sold on Hearn's everyman act ya know. I dont think he's a bad fella or anything, I just dont like it if someone is trying to act like something there not ya know. I watch the IFilm interviews all the time though and his ones aswell so I dont dislike him that much to be honest haha. If you go on twitter there's a fella called Brian King I think it is who absolutely despises Eddie and his whole timeline nearly is him tweeting him talking shit :lol: