BoxRec

Currently 19th in the Boxrec pound for pound ratings?

Can't see how this is possible

Eddie Hearn Bonus points?

rossij8 wrote:Currently 19th in the Boxrec pound for pound ratings?

Can't see how this is possible

Definitely Shouldn't be that high due the opposition he's faced so far but if he trains hard enough I think he could prove to be top 20 easily, maybe even top 10. Skills, power and seems pretty tough.

rossij8 wrote:Currently 19th in the Boxrec pound for pound ratings?

Can't see how this is possible

That's 19th best P4P in The United Kingdom, right?

Horse wrote:

rossij8 wrote:Currently 19th in the Boxrec pound for pound ratings?

Can't see how this is possible

That's 19th best P4P in The United Kingdom, right?

Nope!!

danconnollyeire wrote:Nope!!

He shouldn't be in the world's top 200 P4P let alone 19th.

I like brook but untill he's beat a top level opponent then his name and P4P shouldnt be mentioned in the same sentance.

I wouldn't have khan in the top 20 and he's a long way ahead of brook

Terrrrry wrote:

X2

Bennyblanco wrote:I like brook but untill he's beat a top level opponent then his name and P4P shouldnt be mentioned in the same sentance.

There are about 60 odd world titlists who have beaten a world champion or fought a contender for a vacant belt; it could be argued that Lomachenko beat someone last week as good as anyone on Brooks record; is he number 20 P4P?

You'd struggle to make a case for him being 19th at welterweight never mind 19th p4p.

Andypittcov wrote:I wouldn't have khan in the top 20 and he's a long way ahead of brook

I have brook ahead of khan, I think brook stops khan any day of the week.

rhino222 wrote:

Andypittcov wrote:I wouldn't have khan in the top 20 and he's a long way ahead of brook

I have brook ahead of khan, I think brook stops khan any day of the week.

But that is an imaginary thing of something that hasn't happened and may not happen; Khan is by far the better proven fighter, he has a far better amateur pedigree, has faced far better opposition has (somehow) wrangled a mega fight with Mayweather (no chance at all but very decent money) and is he a year younger than Kell? Khan has his faults but at least his ranking is based on his wins and losses and not through some fortune telling.

palooka wrote:

rhino222 wrote:

Andypittcov wrote:I wouldn't have khan in the top 20 and he's a long way ahead of brook

I have brook ahead of khan, I think brook stops khan any day of the week.

But that is an imaginary thing of something that hasn't happened and may not happen; Khan is by far the better proven fighter, he has a far better amateur pedigree, has faced far better opposition has (somehow) wrangled a mega fight with Mayweather (no chance at all but very decent money) and is he a year younger than Kell? Khan has his faults but at least his ranking is based on his wins and losses and not through some fortune telling.

Yeah but I think your forgetting an important factor!!!!!

Brook is from Yorkshire ... And so is rhino

And so am I

whats david price 18th?

palooka wrote:

Bennyblanco wrote:I like brook but untill he's beat a top level opponent then his name and P4P shouldnt be mentioned in the same sentance.

There are about 60 odd world titlists who have beaten a world champion or fought a contender for a vacant belt; it could be argued that Lomachenko beat someone last week as good as anyone on Brooks record; is he number 20 P4P?

Ok ill re phrase that. Untill he's beaten numerous world level boxers

[/quote]

Yeah but I think your forgetting an important factor!!!!!

Brook is from Yorkshire ... And so is rhino[/quote]

Not sure how I am from yorkshire. I have no flat cap. I have no whippet, I dont drink bitter, I was born in cyprus, lived in singapore and germany for many years, parents from manchester, live in lincolnshire and never have lived in yorkshire!!

rhino222 wrote: Not sure how I am from yorkshire. I have no flat cap. I have no whippet, I dont drink bitter, I was born in cyprus, lived in singapore and germany for many years, parents from manchester, live in lincolnshire and never have lived in yorkshire!!

This is your picture from the 'What do you really look like?' Thread, is it not?

Bennyblanco wrote:

palooka wrote:

Bennyblanco wrote:I like brook but untill he's beat a top level opponent then his name and P4P shouldnt be mentioned in the same sentance.

There are about 60 odd world titlists who have beaten a world champion or fought a contender for a vacant belt; it could be argued that Lomachenko beat someone last week as good as anyone on Brooks record; is he number 20 P4P?

Ok ill re phrase that. Untill he's beaten numerous world level boxers

There was no need at all to rephrase; I was agreeing with you, my point was that there were over 60 boxers with a claim to a world title who'd at least tackled someone at world level, that someone who hasn't yet done that can be ranked 19 P4P is a touch bizzare; I understand and appreciate that Brook is a very good boxer with qualities that may get him a world title but he'd have to prove himself by defending the title against other very good men before he ought to be considered in a P4P list.

SNG wrote:

rhino222 wrote: Not sure how I am from yorkshire. I have no flat cap. I have no whippet, I dont drink bitter, I was born in cyprus, lived in singapore and germany for many years, parents from manchester, live in lincolnshire and never have lived in yorkshire!!

This is your picture from the 'What do you really look like?' Thread, is it not?

yes that's me, you bastard, where did you get that from, its one of my personal and private collection.

You must have some doggy treats in your pocket else I'm phoning the RSPCA, that dog has a keen interest in your groin.