BoxRec

Got a very good draw tonight was just wondering, if he had a good promoter and was matched well how good do you think he could be? He can be amazing and then diabolical the next fight.

Pace got a draw vs Yigit, maybe a little bit lucky for Pace, most saw Yigit winning a close fight

Groove Armada wrote:

Freiheit wrote:Pace got a draw vs Yigit, maybe a little bit lucky for Pace, most saw Yigit winning a close fight

I see, maybe call the thread spoiler?

Where are you actually going to watch the fight? and you shouldn't go on boxing forums if you don't want to know.

WelshJack wrote:

Groove Armada wrote:

Freiheit wrote:Pace got a draw vs Yigit, maybe a little bit lucky for Pace, most saw Yigit winning a close fight

I see, maybe call the thread spoiler?

you shouldn't go on boxing forums if you don't want to know.

That's Bollox, I have been to live shows and taped other shows to watch later. It takes a bloody second to put a spoiler on any thread.

If I go to a show and tape other ones I wouldn't go on here until i've seen them, but the difference here is you can't watch the Pace fight.

WelshJack wrote:If I go to a show and tape other ones I wouldn't go on here until i've seen them, but the difference here is you can't watch the Pace fight.

That's you, like I said it takes seconds to put Spoiler on a thread.

taffytoon wrote:

WelshJack wrote:If I go to a show and tape other ones I wouldn't go on here until i've seen them, but the difference here is you can't watch the Pace fight.

That's you, like I said it takes seconds to put Spoiler on a thread.

Was it on video TV etc.. Spoiler No spoiler does it reall matter if you ain't going to watch it??

I remember thinking the same thing about Tony Pace after his fight with Ronnie Heffron. He's only 20 though so there's plenty of time, ala Steve Robinson.

Londonirish wrote:

taffytoon wrote:

WelshJack wrote:If I go to a show and tape other ones I wouldn't go on here until i've seen them, but the difference here is you can't watch the Pace fight.

That's you, like I said it takes seconds to put Spoiler on a thread.

Was it on video TV etc.. Spoiler No spoiler does it reall matter if you ain't going to watch it??

If anyone has respect and manners for others it matters, for those who has none it doesn't. you chose which camp you're in.

taffytoon wrote: If anyone has respect and manners for others it matters, for those who has none it doesn't. you chose which camp you're in.

You need to relax

I know what Camp I'm in...

Get real with spoiler requests

What's the etiquette 1 week ? Before you can openly discuss

Keep off the boxing forum u planks

sweetscience wrote:Get real with spoiler requests

What's the etiquette 1 week ? Before you can openly discuss

Keep off the boxing forum u planks

Put spoiler in the title and it can be real time. And the ? Should come after the question " You Plank".

taffytoon wrote:

sweetscience wrote:Get real with spoiler requests

What's the etiquette 1 week ? Before you can openly discuss

Keep off the boxing forum u planks

Put spoiler in the title and it can be real time. And the ? Should come after the question " You Plank".

This is a boxing forum not an English grammar forum... We discuss results .. Boxing etc

Whilst I fully support the idea of "spoiler" in thread titles I'd have to agree, if you don't want to know the result don't go on Twitter, Facebook or boxrec! It's like reading the Sunday paper before watching match of the day.

Can sympathise if it was something you were really looking forward to though. Annoying stumbling across results.

Aww no I was hoping to watch this fight when it got posted on you tube.. Can't believe you never put spoiler so inconsiderate. In future be aware. I watch press conferences on IFilm so put spoiler before any news aswell. Actually just put spoiler before every thread. Devastated

daviddee wrote:Aww no I was hoping to watch this fight when it got posted on you tube.. Can't believe you never put spoiler so inconsiderate. In future be aware. I watch press conferences on IFilm so put spoiler before any news aswell. Actually just put spoiler before every thread. Devastated

You lot on a wind up??


This had Been posted 1 WEEK after the Fight, by then it don't need to be called a Spoiler. During a fight or the following day then Yes.. You know he fought last week in the Title is his name DON'T click on it. You really think by going on boxing site you ain't going to find things out about boxing..

Gutted. Was looking forward to watching this. Always has to be one who spoils the forum.

Ban?

Londonirish wrote:

daviddee wrote:Aww no I was hoping to watch this fight when it got posted on you tube.. Can't believe you never put spoiler so inconsiderate. In future be aware. I watch press conferences on IFilm so put spoiler before any news aswell. Actually just put spoiler before every thread. Devastated

You lot on a wind up??


This had Been posted 1 WEEK after the Fight, by then it don't need to be called a Spoiler. During a fight or the following day then Yes.. You know he fought last week in the Title is his name DON'T click on it. You really think by going on boxing site you ain't going to find things out about boxing..

Haha I'm on the wind up some proper bell ends up there^^^^^ Watch when it comes on you tube haha

Even if you were going to watch the fight on you tube it normally says the result in the title anyway.

You have to use a bit of common sense reading forums. Last night I recorded the Frampton bill, so stayed off Boxec, Facebook etc till I came home and watched it. It's not difficult.

magnus wrote:You have to use a bit of common sense reading forums. Last night I recorded the Frampton bill, so stayed off Boxec, Facebook etc till I came home and watched it. It's not difficult.

I conceed, I understand how difficult it is for some of you to edit a thread title. It is so difficult for people with very limited intelligence and I should have taken that into account. My apologies.

WelshJack wrote:Got a very good draw tonight was just wondering, if he had a good promoter and was matched well how good do you think he could be? He can be amazing and then diabolical the next fight.

Diabolical?! Really? I've been to almost all of Tony's fights and he's never been diabolical. That's very harsh. The only time he was below bar was when he was ill, killing himself to make lightweight and came up against a very good Craig Woodruff. I've never seen Tony disgrace himself in the ring or be 'diabolical'.

dewipowell wrote:

WelshJack wrote:Got a very good draw tonight was just wondering, if he had a good promoter and was matched well how good do you think he could be? He can be amazing and then diabolical the next fight.

Diabolical?! Really? I've been to almost all of Tony's fights and he's never been diabolical. That's very harsh. The only time he was below bar was when he was ill, killing himself to make lightweight and came up against a very good Craig Woodruff. I've never seen Tony disgrace himself in the ring or be 'diabolical'.

That probably wasn't the correct word it's more of a Jekyll and Hyde sort of thing really.

daviddee wrote:

Londonirish wrote:

daviddee wrote:Aww no I was hoping to watch this fight when it got posted on you tube.. Can't believe you never put spoiler so inconsiderate. In future be aware. I watch press conferences on IFilm so put spoiler before any news aswell. Actually just put spoiler before every thread. Devastated

You lot on a wind up??


This had Been posted 1 WEEK after the Fight, by then it don't need to be called a Spoiler. During a fight or the following day then Yes.. You know he fought last week in the Title is his name DON'T click on it. You really think by going on boxing site you ain't going to find things out about boxing..

Haha I'm on the wind up some proper bell ends up there^^^^^ Watch when it comes on you tube haha

They could of edited the Title for all not wanting to know the Result D

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2013/pace-g ... ss-denmark

Only joking buddy if it wasn't obvious