Page 1 of 2

Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:12
by daviddee
Curtis saying that Paul is a Prick and he would like to smack him one. Curtis is one of my favourite fighters love his attitude and the fact he is up for some banter on Twitter some people take everything far too serious. Can only see this fight going one way unfortunately but it will be fun all the same.. Will the troll hunter need to hunt himself? Who wins this one?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:18
by lefty
daviddee wrote:Curtis saying that Paul is a Prick and he would like to smack him one. Curtis is one of my favourite fighters love his attitude and the fact he is up for some banter on Twitter some people take everything far too serious. Can only see this fight going one way unfortunately but it will be fun all the same.. Will the troll hunter need to hunt himself? Who wins this one?
Saying he's a prick for what though? Haha.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:22
by daviddee
He hasn't gave a reason just said something that happened before. Curtis is the ultimate twitter troll he pops out that fishing line and all the bites come flooding in.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:23
by lefty
daviddee wrote:He hasn't gave a reason just said something that happened before. Curtis is the ultimate twitter troll he pops out that fishing line and all the bites come flooding in.
He shouldnt hate on trolls then :lol:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:36
by chad
He's not good enough to earn a shot against McCloskey so he's going down the trash talk route. Keyboard gob shite for pay.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:41
by lefty
I dont know what the issue is but it seems a bit harsh from Curtis who seems a sound fella on here.

curtis woodhouse ‏@woodhousecurtis 2h
ive given in and put the boxing on and that dickhead mccloskey pops up on my tv #boxing

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:43
by lefty
Certainly doesnt seem to be fornicating about either :lol:

curtis woodhouse
‏@woodhousecurtis
@davidcoldwell I hate him dave, id fight that prick for free!! make it happen pal
Reply Retweet Favorite More

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:45
by lefty
curtis woodhouse ‏@woodhousecurtis 2h
@Thedogg92 204 followers, I try not to interact with people with less than 10,000 goodbye
Expand

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 19:47
by lefty
Response from Paul ...... Paulmccloskey ‏@Paul_Mccloskey 2h
@woodhousecurtis r u still talking Dickhead how many more times do u need KO'd before u catch urself on realise ur shit u twat #waster


Definietly doesnt seem like harmless banter haha.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 20:00
by daviddee
Where I come from that's harmless banter we go far worse lol.. On a plus side I'm guessing they don't send each other Christmas cards.. I'm not one for starting rumours but I reckon it's personal.. Made a pass at the wife that's the one my money's on

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 20:02
by lefty
daviddee wrote:Where I come from that's harmless banter we go far worse lol.. On a plus side I'm guessing they don't send each other Christmas cards.. I'm not one for starting rumours but I reckon it's personal.. Made a pass at the wife that's the one my money's on
There's more but I couldnt copy and paste it all haha.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 21:13
by tilt
woodhouse isnt good enough to back up what he says most of the time, mccloskey is a diffrent level

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 19 Oct 2013, 21:44
by dhb-raging bull
I like Curtis and he uses the internet to his advantage massively I know he got the stefy bull fight and Frankie gavin fight by giving it some banter on this site unfortuney I don't think he will win a top domestic title (British,commonwealth ) but if he as still got the belief he can do it fair play to him I personally hope he achieves his dream :TU:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 20 Oct 2013, 16:23
by milpool
Get McCloskey over to Hull next month!!

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 03:51
by Yes We Can
McCloskey would have to do more than just posture to win the fight i know that much. Would expect him to win but what exactly has he done since the first bell of the Amir fight?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 04:06
by curtis wood
in 6 years of being a professional fighter I can honestly put my hand on my heart and say ive never REALLY disliked anybody I have fought, ive given out my fair share of trash talk and received it as well but I understand that really deep down we as fighters have the ultimate respect for each other, its a tough way to feed your family, but mccloskey is a jumped up little prick and I don't like him one bit, I cant be bothered to go into reasons why and if im perfectly honest he hasn't done anything apart from talk bad about me which 9/10 times goes over my head but this guy really annoys me, I agreed to fight him in what was a warm up fight for him on the last bill in hull but he didn't go through with it basically saying I wasn't worth it and he had bigger fish to fry which if it was true id have totally understood but he hasn't boxed in about 18 months so whatever the master plan is its taking its time, I know hes better than me, that's not my argument, hes been british and euro champ, something that's a million miles from anything ive achieved but I want to fight him, I thought boxing was a place to have a fight without getting nicked for it, winning or losing or the pay day do not interest me one little bit, I just want to have it out with him in a way I wont get locked up, if anybody can think of a better way for me to punch him in the mouth and not get 18 months im all ears but the best way imo is to go to Belfast put on the 8oz gloves and have it with him, he needs a comeback fight, I want to punch him in the mouth, shouldn't be hard to make it happen
:TU:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 04:14
by mfc_se15
curtis wood wrote:in 6 years of being a professional fighter I can honestly put my hand on my heart and say ive never REALLY disliked anybody I have fought, ive given out my fair share of trash talk and received it as well but I understand that really deep down we as fighters have the ultimate respect for each other, its a tough way to feed your family, but mccloskey is a jumped up little prick and I don't like him one bit, I cant be bothered to go into reasons why and if im perfectly honest he hasn't done anything apart from talk bad about me which 9/10 times goes over my head but this guy really annoys me, I agreed to fight him in what was a warm up fight for him on the last bill in hull but he didn't go through with it basically saying I wasn't worth it and he had bigger fish to fry which if it was true id have totally understood but he hasn't boxed in about 18 months so whatever the master plan is its taking its time, I know hes better than me, that's not my argument, hes been british and euro champ, something that's a million miles from anything ive achieved but I want to fight him, I thought boxing was a place to have a fight without getting nicked for it, winning or losing or the pay day do not interest me one little bit, I just want to have it out with him in a way I wont get locked up, if anybody can think of a better way for me to punch him in the mouth and not get 18 months im all ears but the best way imo is to go to Belfast put on the 8oz gloves and have it with him, he needs a comeback fight, I want to punch him in the mouth, shouldn't be hard to make it happen
:TU:
:lol: :bow: Cracking post that one, proper cheered me up this morning. I am struggling for another way you can give him a smack in the mouth without getting nicked but I'll put my thinking cap on :D

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 04:18
by curtis wood
like I said im all ears :TU:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 04:29
by bigB
Love to see this fight! Be a good one, Paul hasn't fought in a while changed trainers and promoters in the time since the Chop Chop fight.

He needs to become more active.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 04:43
by danconnollyeire
McCloskey's strange low-hands style but not' amazing' head movement invites anyojne to beat him (AKA Corley)

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 05:55
by ajwesty13
haha nice post curtis ..... but im afraid that if you trying for the biggest beef and melt down contest on twitter then your going to have to up your game ....Mr Fury is the champion tweet who has a tweet machine tweeting out his every thought....


:box:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 06:30
by gman tilz
Met Paul and his Dad in Vilamoura, Portugal last year, was very down to earth and a genuinely nice guy, me and my brother had a good chat with him, I thought he was unlucky against Khan and put up a good fight, I personally would not say he is prick but obv don't know whats gone on, I would take him to beat Curtis by KO.

I have great respect for what Curtis has done but Paul is a quite a few classes above in my opinion.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 06:43
by mickey1975
gman tilz wrote:Met Paul and his Dad in Vilamoura, Portugal last year, was very down to earth and a genuinely nice guy, me and my brother had a good chat with him, I thought he was unlucky against Khan and put up a good fight, I personally would not say he is prick but obv don't know whats gone on, I would take him to beat Curtis by KO.

I have great respect for what Curtis has done but Paul is a quite a few classes above in my opinion.
Have you seen the Khan fight or are you going on what Paul told you? He never, by any description, "put up a good fight"!

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 06:55
by Counter-puncher
curtis wood wrote: I just want to have it out with him in a way I wont get locked up, if anybody can think of a better way for me to punch him in the mouth and not get 18 months im all ears but the best way imo is to go to Belfast put on the 8oz gloves and have it with him, he needs a comeback fight, I want to punch him in the mouth, shouldn't be hard to make it happen
:TU:
tremendous stuff :TU:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 07:05
by gman tilz
mickey1975 wrote:
gman tilz wrote:Met Paul and his Dad in Vilamoura, Portugal last year, was very down to earth and a genuinely nice guy, me and my brother had a good chat with him, I thought he was unlucky against Khan and put up a good fight, I personally would not say he is prick but obv don't know whats gone on, I would take him to beat Curtis by KO.

I have great respect for what Curtis has done but Paul is a quite a few classes above in my opinion.
Have you seen the Khan fight or are you going on what Paul told you? He never, by any description, "put up a good fight"!
Yeah I obviously saw the fight, I think with a few adjustments he could have given Khan a tougher fight, I do not think by any means he got schooled but going by many of Pauls fights I think he is definitely a step too far for Curtis and I do not think this fight should happen just because of a bit of "beef" on Twitter, I personally think it would just be a warm up fight for Paul if it did happen and I do not think Curtis warrants the shot at the moment, I think he should take a few English Title level fights and build himself back up, get a few more wins on his record and then have a shot at another Euro/British Level Fighter.