Jimmy Ellis Versus
Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 16:30
Chris Byrd
David Haye
Michael Spinks
Jimmy Young
David Haye
Michael Spinks
Jimmy Young
dempseyfire wrote:He beats them all save Young.
That's nice, how about answering the question instead of inventing your ownIl Duce wrote:Jimmy Ellis
* Draws with Rudi Lubbers.
* KO 4 over Jean-Pierre Coopman
* KO 6 over Jurgen Blin
The boxer who beat Floyd Patterson, Jerry Quarry, George Chuvalo, and Oscar Bonavena in't losing to a European club fighter!Il Duce wrote:Jimmy Ellis
* Draws with Rudi Lubbers.
* KO 4 over Jean-Pierre Coopman
* KO 6 over Jurgen Blin
I would add Leotis Martin too. Leotis Martin was a decent fighter as well. He knocked out Sonny Liston in his final bout.ThatOne wrote:The boxer who beat Floyd Patterson, Jerry Quarry, George Chuvalo, and Oscar Bonavena in't losing to a European club fighter!Il Duce wrote:Jimmy Ellis
* Draws with Rudi Lubbers.
* KO 4 over Jean-Pierre Coopman
* KO 6 over Jurgen Blin
And didn't we agree you would only ruin your own threads and spare the rest of the members of boxrec from reading your inanities unless they so desired.
That's about what I would expect too. The best bet of beating him was Spinks in my view.Il Duce wrote:Before 'March 1970'..............'Decision Win - Decision Win - Decision Win - Decision Win'gilgamesh wrote:So how do you think he does against Haye, Byrd, Jimmy Young or Michael Spinks.
That's the question Il Duce.
Il Duce wrote:Jimmy Ellis
Jimmy's 'KO 1' over Johnny Persol at Madison Square Garden {March 22, 1967}
'Explosion City'
Fastest hands ever for a Heavyweight, especially in the '1st-Round'.
Hitting hard wasn't Jimmy Young's game though. He was a frustrating, slippery, defensive slickster. Like Chris Byrd.ThatOne wrote:The two Jimmys are interesting fights... Young doesn't hit nearly hard enough to get Ellis' attention.
gilgamesh wrote:Hitting hard wasn't Jimmy Young's game though. He was a frustrating, slippery, defensive slickster. Like Chris Byrd.ThatOne wrote:The two Jimmys are interesting fights... Young doesn't hit nearly hard enough to get Ellis' attention.
He was pretty slick, he was a bit of a different type of slick though using his legs more. Ellis always struck me as a lesser version of Ali. He had a similar fighting style, he just wasn't as good.ThatOne wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Hitting hard wasn't Jimmy Young's game though. He was a frustrating, slippery, defensive slickster. Like Chris Byrd.ThatOne wrote:The two Jimmys are interesting fights... Young doesn't hit nearly hard enough to get Ellis' attention.
I know...But Ellis was slick too...That's what makes it a fight...
Considering he was skin and bones as a middleweight and it was only his 17th fight, I'd say Jimmy did pretty well.ThatOne wrote:dempseyfire wrote:He beats them all save Young.
Not bad for a fella who lost to the Hurricane at middleweight.
I would put him in the second tier of near greats.
That's a tough one to call, I'd probably have to favor Foster as Ellis didn't come into his best form until he was a Heavyweight, but it's an interesting matchup all the same.Il Duce wrote:1967
Jimmy Ellis vs. Bob Foster
Always thought would have been a great bout at 175 lbs. to 180 lbs.
Il Duce wrote:I'm pretty sure the reason that James 'Jimmy' Ellis took the bout with
Rubin 'Hurricane' Carter in February 1964 at Madison Square Garden was......... 'MONEY'.
Jimmy hadn't had a bout in 5-Months {since September 1963}.
Not every boxer had the 'backing, support and management' as Cassius Clay....
Ellis was a heavyweight by '67.gilgamesh wrote:That's a tough one to call, I'd probably have to favor Foster as Ellis didn't come into his best form until he was a Heavyweight, but it's an interesting matchup all the same.Il Duce wrote:1967
Jimmy Ellis vs. Bob Foster
Always thought would have been a great bout at 175 lbs. to 180 lbs.