Page 1 of 1
Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 25 Oct 2013, 16:18
by Pugilist-specialist
....under the welterweight limit.
There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 25 Oct 2013, 16:21
by lefty
I thought he looked bad to be honest. Very drawn in the face and dry looking.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 08:11
by mickey1975
Weighing in under is a bad sign!
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 08:14
by Counter-puncher
how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 08:37
by expe
What happened to the ripped body we saw in the preparations for the Alexander fight? That's disappeared and he looks a bit gaunt.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 08:41
by palooka
Pugilist-specialist wrote:....under the welterweight limit.
There were some heated debates on here during the summer with some knowledgeable posters claiming that this wouldn't happen again.
Good on him; hope he's stayed strong at the weight, you know more about the set up than anyone else on here and it looks from the outside like it takes a lot of effort to get down to the weight. Senchenko is a strong kid and if Kell has weakened himself (like Alvarado did last week) then it really is a hard bout.
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 11:12
by jameswilson
Counter-puncher wrote:how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?
He weighed in an ounce or two under......
Re: Kell Brook weighs in....
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 05:35
by Counter-puncher
jameswilson wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:how much under though? McLlellan-Benn under (2lbs plus), or less than that?
He weighed in an ounce or two under......
fook me, he's hardly 'nosedived at the weight' then eh?