Hatton v Witter
-
jamiedavies02
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 158
- Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:26
Hatton v Witter
Why did this never happen??? Especially in the period in 2006 where Ricky was IBF champ and Junior was WBC champ.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
Pettiness and fear.
Re: Hatton v Witter
Yes, a Hatton v Witter thread 
and welcome back David Payne, it's officially just like the old days
and welcome back David Payne, it's officially just like the old days
Re: Hatton v Witter
High risk and low reward I think. I think Ricky believed that Witter's style would of given him problems which likely true and on top of that he didnt bring much financially to the table.
Re: Hatton v Witter
I think this is exactly how it wascolumbo wrote:High risk and low reward I think. I think Ricky believed that Witter's style would of given him problems which likely true and on top of that he didnt bring much financially to the table.
Re: Hatton v Witter
Same reason pacman vs mayweather probably won't happen, too many politics and possibly one being worried about losing to the other. It would have made a lot of money over here even though Ricky always said he couldn't sell out his front room.
Re: Hatton v Witter
Whilst Hatton could sell out fighting my nan and Witter struggled to get his own family all that interested watching him, I reckon a grudge match between the two with a good couple of months of hype would have been huge. Witter wasn't exactly unknowncolumbo wrote:High risk and low reward I think. I think Ricky believed that Witter's style would of given him problems which likely true and on top of that he didnt bring much financially to the table.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Hatton v Witter
aye, 'Junior doesn't bring any fans' is a poor reason given that 18,000 or whatever would turn up to watch Hatton against Stewart or Vilches
Re: Hatton v Witter
I agree. That seemed to be the mentality though for some reason which was unfortunate for us fans!Lenny wrote:Whilst Hatton could sell out fighting my nan and Witter struggled to get his own family all that interested watching him, I reckon a grudge match between the two with a good couple of months of hype would have been huge. Witter wasn't exactly unknowncolumbo wrote:High risk and low reward I think. I think Ricky believed that Witter's style would of given him problems which likely true and on top of that he didnt bring much financially to the table.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
If you say Spud into a mirror three times.....Lenny wrote:Yes, a Hatton v Witter thread :yay:
and welcome back David Payne, it's officially just like the old days
Its a fleeting visit, hello Lenny!
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Hatton v Witter
The story is simple, and has been told many times.
Witter bored the hell out of USTV when he fought Judah, and though losing, he made Judah look bad in an awful fight.
Showtime wouldn't touch him...the tin foil hat brigade can think Ricky was scared all they want
Witter bored the hell out of USTV when he fought Judah, and though losing, he made Judah look bad in an awful fight.
Showtime wouldn't touch him...the tin foil hat brigade can think Ricky was scared all they want
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
Not scared. But I don't remember Vilches being a big hit over there either or Pederson etc.thepocketrocket wrote:The story is simple, and has been told many times.
Witter bored the hell out of USTV when he fought Judah, and though losing, he made Judah look bad in an awful fight.
Showtime wouldn't touch him...the tin foil hat brigade can think Ricky was scared all they want
They could have fitted Witter in and I maintain - Hatton v Witter for the comeback would still have been fun. In a weird, car-crash way.......
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
true. they brought fkk all.
Re: Hatton v Witter
The thing I dont get is why people even care the fight wasnt made. Not all that interesting. Witter had nothing like the career Hatton had and thats because he just wasn't as good.
Re: Hatton v Witter
You're the one who believes Showtime conspired against Witter.thepocketrocket wrote:Showtime wouldn't touch him...the tin foil hat brigade can think Ricky was scared all they want
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Hatton v Witter
Horse wrote:You're the one who believes Showtime conspired against Witter.thepocketrocket wrote:Showtime wouldn't touch him...the tin foil hat brigade can think Ricky was scared all they want
OK, they didn't...sorry Horse
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
No, neither were the mugs Hatton was fed for 12-24 months before Kostya Tszyu - only Stewart made sense as an eliminator, the rest were just fillers, Witter would have stoked up Hatton when he was losing momentum and becoming frustrated and been a huge shot in the arm for british boxing.Trojans44 wrote:The thing I dont get is why people even care the fight wasnt made. Not all that interesting. Witter had nothing like the career Hatton had and thats because he just wasn't as good.
This was, after all still the Calzaghe v muppet years and we were still swamped with WBU/IBA/IBU/WBF bollacks everywhere we looked.....except Hennessey who stuck religiously to British, Commonwealth, EBU and WBC.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Hatton v Witter
Poison because he had a style to cause problems for Hatton....in the ring, not just for TV Executives.Dead Mouse wrote:That's not a bad thing. They turned up to the party with empty hands. Junior turned up with his Russ Abbot record and a single minded determination to force everyone to drink tea and play charades.DavidPayne wrote:true. they brought fkk all.
The truth, be it sad or pragmatic, is that Witter was poison for someone who was trying to establish themselves as an attractive option for the American audiences.
Re: Hatton v Witter
I think that's the point. I don't think they were just out to get Witter, just aware that he might cause Hatton to look pretty clumsy and potentially/possibly/who knows, even beat him. Then they lose out on a massively popular come forward fighter and are left with a guy who once had a 3 minute staring competition with Demarcus Corley.
But I do believe we as fans missed out as a result.
But I do believe we as fans missed out as a result.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Hatton v Witter
Lenny wrote: a 3 minute staring competition with Demarcus Corley.
and to think some people wasted up to 300 words describing this fight
Re: Hatton v Witter
Witter was awful against Corley and that made him easy to avoid.
Re: Hatton v Witter
If I remember rightly, Hatton's story at the time was just that Witter had pissed him off in the past and he didn't want to give him the payday. I remember reading an interview with Hatton where he was like, "well he's doing alright for himself seeing as he's got a world title so maybe it'll happen" although it never did.
I never liked that and it DID seem like Hatton was ducking him. Of course, Witter did his rubbish snake hand lead thing against Timothy Bradley (who I remember thinking at the time looked like he'd be in trouble against Hatton) and lost the title. So that killed it stone dead. Bradley obviously sank without trace...
I just don't think Ricky fancied it. If you dislike someone that much, get in the ring and kick his arse.
I never liked that and it DID seem like Hatton was ducking him. Of course, Witter did his rubbish snake hand lead thing against Timothy Bradley (who I remember thinking at the time looked like he'd be in trouble against Hatton) and lost the title. So that killed it stone dead. Bradley obviously sank without trace...
I just don't think Ricky fancied it. If you dislike someone that much, get in the ring and kick his arse.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Hatton v Witter
The last excuse I heard Hatton give was that Witter shook his hand at the BBC Sports Personality award and said "one day".
Re: Hatton v Witter
Yes hatton didn't need witter Witter needed hatton so he could get a payday but I believe witter would have won but would have been a horrible fight to watchrossij8 wrote:I think this is exactly how it wascolumbo wrote:High risk and low reward I think. I think Ricky believed that Witter's style would of given him problems which likely true and on top of that he didnt bring much financially to the table.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Hatton v Witter
chop chop tried that sh1t on a beach with Kell......Lenny wrote: a guy who once had a 3 minute staring competition with Demarcus Corley.
http://vimeo.com/77888434