Gethin v Crolla Off.
Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 09:11
Gethin has sustained an ear injury. This PPV under card is looking shaky now unless they can pull summat out that hat.
Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.The Insider wrote:Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
. Brilliant card but shit ppv imoHorse wrote:Carl Froch vs George Groves
Scott Quigg vs Diego Oscar Silva
Rocky Fielding vs Lennox Allen
Anthony Joshua vs Hector Alfredo Avila
Martin Murray vs TBA
Jamie McDonnell vs TBA
Anthony Crolla vs TBA
Stephen Smith vs TBA
Callum Smith vs TBA
Luke Campbell vs TBA
Khalid Yafai vs TBA
Scott Cardle vs TBA
What's the point of all of the name fighter vs TBA/journeyman fights? Awful PPV undercard.
I'd go with that.Frankie Gavin wrote:.Horse wrote:Carl Froch vs George Groves
Scott Quigg vs Diego Oscar Silva
Rocky Fielding vs Lennox Allen
Anthony Joshua vs Hector Alfredo Avila
Martin Murray vs TBA
Jamie McDonnell vs TBA
Anthony Crolla vs TBA
Stephen Smith vs TBA
Callum Smith vs TBA
Luke Campbell vs TBA
Khalid Yafai vs TBA
Scott Cardle vs TBA
What's the point of all of the name fighter vs TBA/journeyman fights? Awful PPV undercard.
Brilliant card but poo ppv imo
'They' think we are because they don't cost the same as a US PPV, same night though Manny v Rios is on allegedly and that is a boutScottDetonator wrote:Looks like 3 hours of very one sided contests. Nothing to even get inspired about. Laughable compared to US ppv cards. We aren't getting value.
McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.DMA1987 wrote:Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.The Insider wrote:Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.[/quote]palooka wrote:Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.
There's a good/balanced write up in Boxing News - though I feel for the boxers who are not happy/active enough I do agree with Mr Warren who says something along the lines of, 'A Leyton Orient player can't just get up and say that they are now a Brentwood player'.[/quote]DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.palooka wrote:Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.palooka wrote:DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.
Callum Smith is off the card also.
Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
That means he can't legally leave then, because there's been no breach of contract.DMA1987 wrote:Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.palooka wrote:DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.
Callum Smith is off the card also.
Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
Didn't mention anything legally at all, especially about Paul Smith. I was pointing out to Palooka, and allegedly apparently, that being a boxer is different to being a footballer.expe wrote:That means he can't legally leave then, because there's been no breach of contract.DMA1987 wrote:
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.
He ought to try and picket Warrens offices with a donkey jacket and a burning bin, he may get further; a judge won't let him walk out because he's miffed about how Warren treated his brother (or his nanDMA1987 wrote:Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.palooka wrote:DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.
Callum Smith is off the card also.
Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
He seemed to still retain some aspirations after his last fight. Again I didn't say Paul had the right to leave, I was stating how his case was a little more unique and not the norm.palooka wrote:He ought to try and picket Warrens offices with a donkey jacket and a burning bin, he may get further; a judge won't let him walk out because he's miffed about how Warren treated his brother (or his nanDMA1987 wrote:
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.); Paul may not be arsed about continuing his career in any case, he may have had enough.