Page 1 of 2

Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 09:11
by The Insider
Gethin has sustained an ear injury. This PPV under card is looking shaky now unless they can pull summat out that hat.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 09:16
by DMA1987
Thats a massive loss to this undercard, I hope something can be done to make up for it though we are very late in the day.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 09:54
by geoffburt07
Scott Harrison?

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:03
by pyenest77
& there was me thinking that only allegedly lost fights at late notice.


On a serious note thats quite a big fight to fall over!

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:07
by DMA1987
McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:10
by The Insider
DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:15
by DMA1987
The Insider wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?
Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:25
by Horse
Carl Froch vs George Groves
Scott Quigg vs Diego Oscar Silva
Rocky Fielding vs Lennox Allen
Anthony Joshua vs Hector Alfredo Avila
Martin Murray vs TBA
Jamie McDonnell vs TBA
Anthony Crolla vs TBA
Stephen Smith vs TBA
Callum Smith vs TBA
Luke Campbell vs TBA
Khalid Yafai vs TBA
Scott Cardle vs TBA


What's the point of all of the name fighter vs TBA/journeyman fights? Awful PPV undercard.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:33
by Frankie Gavin
Horse wrote:Carl Froch vs George Groves
Scott Quigg vs Diego Oscar Silva
Rocky Fielding vs Lennox Allen
Anthony Joshua vs Hector Alfredo Avila
Martin Murray vs TBA
Jamie McDonnell vs TBA
Anthony Crolla vs TBA
Stephen Smith vs TBA
Callum Smith vs TBA
Luke Campbell vs TBA
Khalid Yafai vs TBA
Scott Cardle vs TBA


What's the point of all of the name fighter vs TBA/journeyman fights? Awful PPV undercard.
. Brilliant card but shit ppv imo

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:40
by daviddee
Great card of was just Sky very poor PPV.. Groves v Froch isn't PPV on their own.. Will pay it but not too happy about it.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:41
by palooka
Frankie Gavin wrote:
Horse wrote:Carl Froch vs George Groves
Scott Quigg vs Diego Oscar Silva
Rocky Fielding vs Lennox Allen
Anthony Joshua vs Hector Alfredo Avila
Martin Murray vs TBA
Jamie McDonnell vs TBA
Anthony Crolla vs TBA
Stephen Smith vs TBA
Callum Smith vs TBA
Luke Campbell vs TBA
Khalid Yafai vs TBA
Scott Cardle vs TBA


What's the point of all of the name fighter vs TBA/journeyman fights? Awful PPV undercard.
.

Brilliant card but poo ppv imo
I'd go with that.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:51
by dalcumly
Yes totally agree, and remember the top of the bill is really a BRITISH SUPER MIDDLE title fight between the world's number 2 and somebody scraping in to the top ten - maybe.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:54
by ScottDetonator
Looks like 3 hours of very one sided contests. Nothing to even get inspired about. Laughable compared to US ppv cards. We aren't getting value.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 10:55
by palooka
ScottDetonator wrote:Looks like 3 hours of very one sided contests. Nothing to even get inspired about. Laughable compared to US ppv cards. We aren't getting value.
'They' think we are because they don't cost the same as a US PPV, same night though Manny v Rios is on allegedly and that is a bout :box:

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:13
by Chambers2
:evil:

It was the most/only competitive fight on the bill

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:35
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:
The Insider wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:McDonnell and Swifty Smith confirmed
Would like to see who they are being matched with. I thought swiftly has his licence pulled?
Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.
McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:37
by sweetscience
glad im going

no way would i have bought that

i will only watch main event live as im going with loads of lads who would have no interest in the other fights

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:40
by palooka
Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.[/quote]

McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.[/quote]

There's a good/balanced write up in Boxing News - though I feel for the boxers who are not happy/active enough I do agree with Mr Warren who says something along the lines of, 'A Leyton Orient player can't just get up and say that they are now a Brentwood player'.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:41
by DMA1987
palooka wrote:Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.
McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.[/quote]

There's a good/balanced write up in Boxing News - though I feel for the boxers who are not happy/active enough I do agree with Mr Warren who says something along the lines of, 'A Leyton Orient player can't just get up and say that they are now a Brentwood player'.[/quote]

A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.

Callum Smith is off the card also.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:47
by palooka
DMA1987 wrote:
palooka wrote:Eddie confirmed them both on twitter in the last hour so I guess he is allowed to fight. Can't see them being matched against anyone decent at this stage.
McDonnell still has to go before the board on Monday and they ruled that Smith's contract is still valid, so it may be a bit premature to confirm them. There only in 8 rounders anyway.
There's a good/balanced write up in Boxing News - though I feel for the boxers who are not happy/active enough I do agree with Mr Warren who says something along the lines of, 'A Leyton Orient player can't just get up and say that they are now a Brentwood player'.[/quote]

A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.

Callum Smith is off the card also.

Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:50
by DMA1987
palooka wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.

Callum Smith is off the card also.

Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:54
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:
palooka wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.

Callum Smith is off the card also.

Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.
That means he can't legally leave then, because there's been no breach of contract.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 11:58
by DMA1987
expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.
That means he can't legally leave then, because there's been no breach of contract.
Didn't mention anything legally at all, especially about Paul Smith. I was pointing out to Palooka, and allegedly apparently, that being a boxer is different to being a footballer.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 12:01
by palooka
DMA1987 wrote:
palooka wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
A Leyton Orient player gets paid every week.

Callum Smith is off the card also.

Didn't Paul Smith draw a salary (paid monthly) instead of paid by fight?
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.
He ought to try and picket Warrens offices with a donkey jacket and a burning bin, he may get further; a judge won't let him walk out because he's miffed about how Warren treated his brother (or his nan :OhYes: ); Paul may not be arsed about continuing his career in any case, he may have had enough.

Re: Gethin v Crolla Off.

Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 12:07
by DMA1987
palooka wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
Right. But Paul Smith isn't leaving due to that is he - he is leaving because of the issues he has with FW regarding his brother.
He ought to try and picket Warrens offices with a donkey jacket and a burning bin, he may get further; a judge won't let him walk out because he's miffed about how Warren treated his brother (or his nan :OhYes: ); Paul may not be arsed about continuing his career in any case, he may have had enough.
He seemed to still retain some aspirations after his last fight. Again I didn't say Paul had the right to leave, I was stating how his case was a little more unique and not the norm.