Page 1 of 4
Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 16:58
by keithmoonhangover
For me, he spoils fights with all of his negative repeated comments and biased.
Who would you like to replace him with when he retires?
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:01
by lefty
Ron Burgundy...
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:03
by keithmoonhangover
columbo wrote:Ron Burgundy...
60% of the time it works every time.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:11
by hurlock
Spud woolat is the voice of boxing!!
Other then that, i like .....
Duke Mckenzie, Colin McMillan,woodhall, I think calzaghe & hatton may be interested???
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:15
by lefty
hurlock wrote:Spud woolat is the voice of boxing!!
Other then that, i like .....
Duke Mckenzie, Colin McMillan,woodhall, I think calzaghe & hatton may be interested???
Duke Mckenzie?! You must be mental lol.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:18
by hurlock
Dukes allright!! Him & mcneilly used to of a good job together!!
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:22
by ajwesty13
hurlock wrote:Spud woolat is the voice of boxing!!
Other then that, i like .....
Duke Mckenzie, Colin McMillan,woodhall, I think calzaghe & hatton may be interested???
think jo would be great
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:23
by thatllbeme
paul smith is good
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:27
by 1 nut
A monkey ! Watt is a clown
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:31
by keithmoonhangover
I think Haye would do a very good job. *PREPARES HIMSELF FOR A LOAD OF ABUSE*
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:32
by reggaereggae
keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Haye would do a very good job. *PREPARES HIMSELF FOR A LOAD OF ABUSE*
I actually think Haye would be very good - he talks very fluently, in a measured way and is incisive
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:34
by Final round
keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Haye would do a very good job. *PREPARES HIMSELF FOR A LOAD OF ABUSE*
Good call
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:36
by Wales
Sky need to do the same with boxing as they did with football, bring in a modern fresh ex fighter. Either that or a red button option
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:36
by Emmseegee
I think they should do same thing as they do with the football and let fans commentate on the 'red button'
Even just for a laugh they should give them free drink.

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:40
by keithmoonhangover
Emmseegee wrote:I think they should do same thing as they do with the football and let fans commentate on the 'red button'
Even just for a laugh they should give them free drink.

Me and Palooka could do the Froch-Groves rematch. All you'll hear is me saying "COME ON CARL!"
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:44
by whiskey
Haye is pretty good and very good speaker.
He was under the cosh with Froch vs Groves, on account of knowing both guys over many years and was very balanced throughout.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:44
by Emmseegee
Some of my mates who aint got a clue about boxing would be funny as fu<k on that.
Body shots are
'Punches tae the belly'
a defensive fighter is
'a sh1te bag'
a guy without glittery shorts on '
has just been dragged out the pub'
I do agree that Haye would be good.

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:46
by hurlock
keithmoonhangover wrote:Emmseegee wrote:I think they should do same thing as they do with the football and let fans commentate on the 'red button'
Even just for a laugh they should give them free drink.

Me and Palooka could do the Froch-Groves rematch. All you'll hear is me saying "COME ON CARL!"
Get off froch's dik!
Haye is a good talker & comes across well ,again nurtured by the dark lord !!
If like some life coaching off booth , hopefully it rubs off on my old nemesis spud
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
DD
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:51
by ShadrachSimmo
Haye would be good. He's quite articulate.
But ultimately anyone as Watt is an absolute joke.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:57
by Final round
Jim Watt can be quite insightful but maybe they should just go to him for a mid-round summary. A whole fight seen through his one-eye is too much
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:58
by expe
Should just mix it up more. Use everyone available, rather than just Watt.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 18:01
by DMA1987
Watt is a better than average analyst so I would look to shift him maybe rather than a complete offload. Paul Smith would be fine, though anybody who won't display a blatant bias would be an upgrade and infinitely easier listening.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 18:02
by ajwesty13
expe wrote:Should just mix it up more. Use everyone available, rather than just Watt.
yeah i agree i do like jim thou... the trouble is atm if you havent got jim then you got mcrory that upsets me
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 18:04
by expe
ajwesty13 wrote:expe wrote:Should just mix it up more. Use everyone available, rather than just Watt.
yeah i agree i do like jim thou... the trouble is atm if you havent got jim then you got mcrory that upsets me
Paul Smith's an option, there's Duke McKenzie and various other options. Variety is the spice of life and all that shit.
Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 18:05
by palooka
I'd like to see Johnny Nelson at the bouts and commentating, Jon Thaxton was good as well I've seen him before.
Thanks for the shout Keith but I blush and sweat awful whenever I'm in public under scrutiny, it's socially restrictive :(