BoxRec

Don't know about anybody else, but I was impressed with Andy Scott's commentary last night. Thought he described the action pretty well & managed to keep things interesting, and Alex Arthur offered a few decent insights.

Definitely an improvement on the usual Halling/Watt tedium, hopefully a sign that Sky will be open to experiment a bit more with its commentary line-up in future.

Agree.

Alex didn't add much, but Andy Scott did really well indeed.

Was Andy Clarke not Andy Scott and he did a really good job.

Martin H wrote:Was Andy Clarke not Andy Scott and he did a really good job.

Oh thanks. My mistake



In my defence, it was late & I'd had a few beers.

In that case I'd definitely like to hear more from Andy Clarke in future broadcasts!

He also did Golovkin-Stevens with Matt Macklin. He's far superior to Halling in my personal opinion.

Nick "not one little bit" halling is terrible.

Adam smith is even worse as a commentator!

Boxerbeetle123 wrote:Don't know about anybody else, but I was impressed with Andy Scott's commentary last night. Thought he described the action pretty well & managed to keep things interesting, and Alex Arthur offered a few decent insights.

Definitely an improvement on the usual Halling/Watt tedium, hopefully a sign that Sky will be open to experiment a bit more with its commentary line-up in future.

Yeah i really liked scott thought Arthur was good to not over powering

dbflex wrote:He also did Golovkin-Stevens with Matt Macklin. He's far superior to Halling in my personal opinion.

Loved what he said about the language in Steven's corner "Apologies for that but this is a middleweight world title fight, not a tea party."