Page 1 of 1
Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 16 Dec 2013, 21:56
by amwsnw
I have heard Sam has had his number one ranking in the IBF stripped, putting his shot at Sturm in jeopardy. The reason is basically he cannot fight for another regions title (PABA) without defending or instead of defending the IBF regional. Because he fought Sherrington the IBF have stripped him. IF this is correct what the hell were Sams management thinking? Or were they fed some crap about getting a crack at Fletcher or Murray. Can anybody confirm or deny this? As a long time, staunch supporter of Sams I will be gutted if this has happend!!!!
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 16 Dec 2013, 23:31
by kylamy
amwsnw wrote:I have heard Sam has had his number ranking in the IBF stripped, putting his shot at Sturm in jeopardy. The reason is basically he cannot fight for another regions title (PABA) without defending or instead of defending the IBF regional. Because he fought Sherrington the IBF have stripped him. IF this is correct what the hell were Sams management thinking? Or were they fed some crap about getting a crack at Fletcher or Murray. Can anybody confirm or deny this? As a long time staunch supporter of Sams I will be gutted if this has happend!!!!
I can confirm this, Soliman knows nothing about being stripped by the IBF, because it is only a lie, more garbage started by the resident fool, with nothing more to do than try and cause drama, the resident fool, tries to make everyone believe that he knows everything that is going on, when infact, he simply makes up stories as he goes.
Soliman, has a letter from IBF President Lindsay Tucker confirming he is ok to challenge for the WBA-PABA title, so where this garbage originated is easy to see. It is just one jealous trouble making goose, who wants everyone to believe he knows everything that is going on, there is absolutely no truth or substance to his statement on another forum, and he has again, been found out lying and making up stories.
I can also confirm that Sam Soliman, has now become the Mandatory challenger to Jarrod Fletcher for the WBA-PABA title, and this fight must happen sooner than later.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 17 Dec 2013, 00:14
by amwsnw
If that is fact, I am over the moon. Would much rather see Sam v Sturm than Sam v Fletcher, unless Fletcher defeats Murray, whenever that happens.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 17 Dec 2013, 02:41
by AntonS
IBF President Lindsay Tucker
Ouch!
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 17 Dec 2013, 04:15
by Ipswich Express
Fletcher announcing a big fight this week. Will take place early next year in Europe.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 17 Dec 2013, 08:52
by amwsnw
So Fletcher fights Murray and Sam fights Sturm. The world has returned to normal !!
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 01:15
by dberry
It's all good, false alarm raised by resident know-it-all dagoose.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 03:33
by DA GOOSE
dberry wrote:It's all good, false alarm raised by resident know-it-all dagoose.
I didn't start this pal.
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 06:48
by dberry
DA GOOSE wrote:dberry wrote:It's all good, false alarm raised by resident know-it-all dagoose.
I didn't start this pal.
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
That's why I gave it lower case letters, I didn't want you to tarnished by implications to our resident fuckwwit

Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 19:48
by amwsnw
I got the info third hand from someone who had heard through another forum. Hence why I posted it on here to try and get some facts. Any idea when Sturm must defend the belt against Sam by? Would Melbourne generate enough money to have the fight in Australia? or maybe Felix vacates and Sam and Daniel can fight for the vacant IBF title (yes, dreaming I know).
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 20:28
by Perseus
http://assets.ibf-usba-boxing.com/File/ ... dments.pdf
From the IBF rules it looks like he has 6 to 9 months.
Due to his injuries it seems unlikely but Barker could enforce his rematch clause.
Sturm generates too much money in Germany to travel for any current middleweights.
Sam will be making another trip to Germany.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 22:08
by AntonS
kylamy wrote:amwsnw wrote:I have heard Sam has had his number ranking in the IBF stripped, putting his shot at Sturm in jeopardy. The reason is basically he cannot fight for another regions title (PABA) without defending or instead of defending the IBF regional. Because he fought Sherrington the IBF have stripped him. IF this is correct what the hell were Sams management thinking? Or were they fed some crap about getting a crack at Fletcher or Murray. Can anybody confirm or deny this? As a long time staunch supporter of Sams I will be gutted if this has happend!!!!
I can confirm this, Soliman knows nothing about being stripped by the IBF, because it is only a lie, more garbage started by the resident fool, with nothing more to do than try and cause drama, the resident fool, tries to make everyone believe that he knows everything that is going on, when infact, he simply makes up stories as he goes.
Soliman, has a letter from IBF President Lindsay Tucker confirming he is ok to challenge for the WBA-PABA title, so where this garbage originated is easy to see. It is just one jealous trouble making goose, who wants everyone to believe he knows everything that is going on, there is absolutely no truth or substance to his statement on another forum, and he has again, been found out lying and making up stories.
I can also confirm that Sam Soliman, has now become the Mandatory challenger to Jarrod Fletcher for the WBA-PABA title, and this fight must happen sooner than later.
Is that so?
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 23:01
by buster007
well, is it not?
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 18 Dec 2013, 23:19
by AntonS
buster007 wrote:well, is it not?
Whether Fletcher wins or losses in WBA world title challenge come Feb 1, PABA title will become vacant.
Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 19 Dec 2013, 05:24
by dberry
Then it is clearly vacant to #'s 1 and #2 challengers does it not

Re: Sam Soliman - Say it isn't so
Posted: 19 Dec 2013, 06:43
by AntonS
dberry wrote:Then it is clearly vacant to #'s 1 and #2 challengers does it not

Some PABA interim titilsts remained as such for yonks. Dianever Orcales was one of them. He was eventually elevated to full champ, but only 'cos champ was elevated to "super champ". At all times Vocale guaranteed he'll get a shot at him, which never eventuated.
He was then demoted to #1 contender (in recess) – whatever that means? And then got a shot at the full title last Friday in Sydney at short notice.
Talk about a frigging outright con.