Warren's brief responds to boxingtalk.net
Posted: 05 May 2004, 18:17
Check it out on boxingtalk.net.
If Olga Brooks works for Sky, what proof do we have (other than her word) that she fairly represented the details of the contract to Guzman and his representatives? Was the contract strictly in English, or also translated into Spanish? At what time did Guzman sign the agreement, and was he fully aware of his rights?Steven Heath wrote:It is clear that negotiations conducted by Sports Network?s Andy Ayling and Olga Brooks, who speaks Spanish, did go on into the early hours of the morning, however, that was as a result of the negotiations stance being taken by Rafael Guerreo [sic] on behalf of the boxer. This meeting was a continuous meeting and there was no question of Joan Guzman being awoken to sign the agreement.
Assuming there was no pressure from WBO president Valcarel to "sign with Warren or else," and that he was well-informed as to what was in the contract when he signed it, and fully aware of his right to not sign anything until he had a chance to have a qualified person representing *him* examine it to their satisfaction - those are precisely the things at the heart of the matter, and for which we have only the conflicting words of Guzman's manager and Warren's counsel.adamiw wrote:if the contracts are there, signed, all done correctly Guzman cant have too many complaints.
Olga Brookes is not independent. Their is a clear conflict of interest.Eric the Viking wrote:So show us the paperwork, Heathie-boy. Let's see how much Guzman was getting paid, and whether Sky fulfilled any obligations it may have had under the promotional agreement. It's very easy for a promoter to sign a fighter for X number of fights, then do f***-all to make said fights (which it is the promoter's job to do, BTW). Is the contract completely based on number of fights (which would in effect constitute indentured servitude in that the fighter has no escape clause), or is there also a time limit?
If Olga Brooks works for Sky, what proof do we have (other than her word) that she fairly represented the details of the contract to Guzman and his representatives? Was the contract strictly in English, or also translated into Spanish? At what time did Guzman sign the agreement, and was he fully aware of his rights?Steven Heath wrote:It is clear that negotiations conducted by Sports Network?s Andy Ayling and Olga Brooks, who speaks Spanish, did go on into the early hours of the morning, however, that was as a result of the negotiations stance being taken by Rafael Guerreo [sic] on behalf of the boxer. This meeting was a continuous meeting and there was no question of Joan Guzman being awoken to sign the agreement.
With regard to the allegations involving WBO president Valcarel, it's called "deniability." Unless and until we hear from the other people that were there (and I don't mean just Mr. Valcarcel,) it's a he-said-she-said.
Shame Branco didn't walk out and spare us 12 of the horriblest rounds you'll ever see.theguru wrote:Getting fighters to sign contracts under pressure is one of SN specialities.
When Robin Reid fought Branco Andy Ayling was trying to get branco to sign a contract 10 mins before he fought ,Branc refused thats why there was about a 10 min delay.
Nothing clearly libelous, apparently. Good thing, too, because as far as I can tell the FW "forum" is simply a graveyard for posts that might be construed as libelous of FW. Does any non-moderator here actually have access to the FW forum?REAL_DEAL wrote:why didnt this go into the FW forum?