Page 1 of 1
Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 07:40
by ajwesty13
Sources are coming out and stating that the deal has been done... Both parties have come to an agreement and will be fighting on the 14 of September..
Thoughts??
Mine are i personally think that pac has not aged as well MW, and is not the fighter he was a few years a go.... but still would love to see this fight... result is MW by decision
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 07:52
by earsjohn
Amir Khan will be happy!
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 08:02
by ajwesty13
earsjohn wrote:Amir Khan will be happy!
Over the moon springs to mind :)
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 08:25
by bigB
deffo Khan in May Pacman Sept
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 09:14
by TopGun
Believe it when I see it.....where do you get this from???
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 09:24
by ajwesty13
TopGun wrote:Believe it when I see it.....where do you get this from???
sources that broke the MW v Guerro/Canelo fight but then there is other sources that say it isnt on but then Pac is now the mandatory ... i so wish i never opened this can of worms lol
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 10:55
by Chambers2
About fcuking time
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 11:00
by Deserter
A) I don't believe it will happen.
B) If it does it will be a complete anti-climax. As already mentioned, Pacman has declined too much to be any sort of viable threat to Mayweather.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 11:07
by ajwesty13
Deserter wrote:A) I don't believe it will happen.
B) If it does it will be a complete anti-climax. As already mentioned, Pacman has declined too much to be any sort of viable threat to Mayweather.
yeah would have liked this to happen a few years a go.... still looking forward to it if it does happen thou..
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 12:49
by Bard of Boxrec
Is Say Sources a channel I can stream?
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 13:43
by ttornado
Wow great match up, amazed it hasn't been talked about before now
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 13:52
by lefty
Floyd would of beaten any version of Manny. Anyway, im not sure where the conclusive evidence is that Manny has declined that much as a fighter aside from Marquez timing him and knocking him clean out. The Rios fight, he was just going through the motions.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 14:34
by ALI
I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 14:38
by Spud
The fight is a f*cking million miles from being made - FACT
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 15:04
by Spud
Power777 wrote:Spud wrote:The fight is a f*cking million miles from being made - FACT
Thanks for that.
I was being a tadge conservative!!
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 15:10
by palooka
ALI wrote:I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
don't underestimate the power we have, sat in our bedrooms, fingers tapping.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 15:36
by ajwesty13
ALI wrote:I'm not falling for it, what evidence do we have to back this claim up? Nothing by the sounds of it!
If this fight ever happens news of it wont break out on a boxing forum.
it was from youtube boxingtv channel... stumbled on it today... but it seems as though its a load of bo11ox..oh well knew it was to good to be true. .
however it seems as though the guardian reads these boxing forums haha
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/j ... -september
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 00:10
by Boxing Prospect
Pacquiao the mandatory? I keep reading that but, isn't he just the #1 contender? According to the WBC Mayweather v Guerrero was a mandatory, less than a year ago.
Re: Mayweather v Pacquiao Is On Say Sources
Posted: 04 Jan 2014, 14:02
by Finn
Viktor Vaughn wrote:Boxing Prospect wrote:Pacquiao the mandatory? I keep reading that but, isn't he just the #1 contender? According to the WBC Mayweather v Guerrero was a mandatory, less than a year ago.
The WBC rules state that you have to make one mandatory per year, but they also say that you have to defend the WBC belt at least three times a year (one mano, two voluntaries). On the other hand, they can make concessions depending on circumstances and, to ice the cake, the President has special dispensation to make things up as he goes along.
This story will have stemmed from someone looking at the rules, seeing that he did his mandatory last year and put two and two together.
The WBC, and Floyd for that matter, can do whatever they want whenever they want to do it.
As for the fight, Manny gets battered by Floyd at any point in their careers.
true that