Good or bad? I dunno
Posted: 16 Jan 2014, 11:25
Frankie Gavin re-signs with FW http://www.BS.com/frankie-gavi ... hot--73697
Why don't you tell us what this thread is about?Good or bad? I dunno
I agree mate. At the moment his talent is being wasted somewhat I think.geoffburt07 wrote:Very talented but Frank hasn't got him as far as I would have liked at this point. 2014 is a big year for him.
columbo wrote:It tells you in the link mate.
You're breaking the forum's rules.***FORUM RULES***
2. No hyperlinks without a summary. Please post an abstract of your article and allow people to decide if it's worth clicking on your link.
The title explained nothing and then you just posted a link.columbo wrote:Cmon Horse, you're being anal mate.
No need to rush it? He's been a pro for 5 years and yet hasn't tested himself above domestic level. All good and well proving to be great against domestic opponents but for someone as highly touted as he is his progression has been snail paced.Ezzard wrote:Frankie is a nightmare for anyone in the world. I think his skills are outstanding. We need to see his level of opposition step up now...no need to rush it...but he needs testing and being put into uncomfortable situations. But he has no need to fear anyone at the moment.
Khan's more naturally talented in my opinion.Boxing Prospect wrote:I think we'd all agree that Frankie has more natural talent than Khan so why is he still treading water?
Horse wrote:The title explained nothing and then you just posted a link.columbo wrote:Cmon Horse, you're being anal mate.
This is unacceptable.
What ??TopGun wrote:Horse wrote:The title explained nothing and then you just posted a link.columbo wrote:Cmon Horse, you're being anal mate.
This is unacceptable.
Struth, give the guy a break Horse......
He does this all of the time though.TopGun wrote:Struth, give the guy a break Horse......
Being a pudendum I see Horse. Early start in the stables?Horse wrote:He does this all of the time though.TopGun wrote:Struth, give the guy a break Horse......
He's the worst thread starter on BoxRec.
columbo wrote:Being a pudendum I see Horse. Early start in the stables?
You just can't stop, can you?***FORUM RULES***
1. No excessive profanity - children read this board
5. No personal insults or hatespeech
5. No personal insults or hatespeechHorse wrote:He does this all of the time though.TopGun wrote:Struth, give the guy a break Horse......
He's the worst thread starter on BoxRec.
Which other poster regularly breaks forum rule No. 2 on this site? Which other poster regularly starts threads with titles that explain nothing about what the thread is about?columbo wrote:5. No personal insults or hatespeech
It's still a personal insult Horse. You're breaking the very rules they you expect other people to adhere so much so follow your own adviceHorse wrote:Which other poster regularly breaks forum rule No. 2 on this site? Which other poster regularly starts threads with titles that explain nothing about what the thread is about?columbo wrote:5. No personal insults or hatespeech
I was merely stating the truth that you are the worst thread starter on BoxRec.
I'm trying to help you, columbo.columbo wrote:It's still a personal insult Horse. You're breaking the very rules they you expect other people to adhere so much so follow your own advice
Fair enough. Well i've added a brief description relating to what the link is about anyway.Horse wrote:I'm trying to help you, columbo.columbo wrote:It's still a personal insult Horse. You're breaking the very rules they you expect other people to adhere so much so follow your own advice
You should either put more effort into your threads or stop making them.