BoxRec

He always slags off the sun for letting Frank write his column in there. I'm pleased as it is another read for the fans I guess: -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... smail.html

like the cribs type view on Matchroom HQ

Shame it's for a rag like that .

Just another reason not to buy the daily mail.

After all the shit Patrick Collins has been sprouting about boxing.

I said this should happen last week..

Oh dear.

In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.

ringtoneboxing wrote:In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.

Remove the word boxing from your sentence and your closer

The Tory Cunnting Mail!!!

Have a word with yaself Edward

The man who represents boxers who are usually from poor backgrounds signs for a paper who castigate the poor

Well done Eddie....I am sure all those vicious, racist old grannies from Worthing and Bexhill-on-Sea, deeply bitter minor civil servants, health and safety inspectors, right-wing housewives with absurd blue perms and retired, barking-mad majors will be ringside at your next show. Please make sure you mention how birching really works, stereotype some black people as inherent criminals and name check the War in every column.

His love of shipping cheap argies over wont go down well

TJ77 wrote:

ringtoneboxing wrote:In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.

Remove the word boxing from your sentence and your closer

Exactly right.

Good look to Eddie Hearn but that newspaper organisation is a piece of sh1t. Particularly packed full of hateful tory propaganda. I certainly wouldnt want my name associated with it.

Eddie is a posh, rich boy himself though at the end of the day.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it

Hearn is mooting (not that much) Froch vs Golovkin. GGG isn't as slick as Groves but hits a but harder IMO and Froch is easy to catch. I could see that being a stoppage because Carl can only last so long using his face as a shield (as Groves proved) and doesn't have to power to KO GGG

danconnollyeire wrote:Hearn is mooting (not that much) Froch vs Golovkin. GGG isn't as slick as Groves but hits a but harder IMO and Froch is easy to catch. I could see that being a stoppage because Carl can only last so long using his face as a shield (as Groves proved) and doesn't have to power to KO GGG

Hard to tell whether he hits harder. Groves is a massive puncher.

heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it

Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the fornicate is the man on?

expe wrote:

heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it

Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the eff is the man on?

I don't know but could they have put any more pictures of Eddie on that page? Did they sign him for his looks or his boxing journalistic ability?

ScottDetonator wrote:

expe wrote:

heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it

Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the eff is the man on?

I don't know but could they have put any more pictures of Eddie on that page? Did they sign him for his looks or his boxing journalistic ability?

He is outrageously handsome.

People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.

G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.

You're not unemployed, are you?

mickey1975 wrote:

G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.

You're not unemployed, are you?

You should realise by now Mickey that there's normally a hint of dark humour in Gomez's posts.

G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.

I hate Carl Froch, but there is no way I'd want to be him, although I would give his missus a go or three.