Page 1 of 1
Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 22 Jan 2014, 17:16
by Vladimir5555
What happens?
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 22 Jan 2014, 17:23
by gilgamesh
Spinks UD
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 22 Jan 2014, 17:27
by Vladimir5555
gilgamesh wrote:Spinks UD
Agreed.Spinks better fighter than Griffin.Spinks couldn't knocking out JT but could outworked him.
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 22 Jan 2014, 17:28
by gilgamesh
Vladimir5555 wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Spinks UD
Agreed.Spinks better fighter than Griffin.Spinks couldn't knocking out JT but could outworked him.
James wasn't the greatest at dealing with guys who could box well from a distance either, Michael could certainly do that as well as most any Light Heavyweight ever could. Bad style match-up for James.
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 22 Jan 2014, 20:45
by Bobbyptsd
Indeed, the moment I saw this thread I thought: "Not a good style for James"
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 12:54
by elmersalsa
Bobbyptsd wrote:Indeed, the moment I saw this thread I thought: "Not a good style for James"
Exactly.
Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175
Posted: 24 Jan 2014, 08:14
by Tomasino
Spinks wide UD. No chance for Tiney here, Spinks just too strong, too fit and too good for Toney.