The Mesi-Guinn logic
Posted: 09 May 2004, 09:00
What's with the rationale that claims that because Mesi and Guinn have looked less than stellar, the field is open for Audley.
I know it makes it easier for the BBC to hype Harrison's chances on the world stage, but it is a threadbare logic.
In terms of the current top 20 we can expect most of
the Klits, Tua, Toney, McCline, Ruiz, Rahman, Brewster, Gomez, Oquendo, Byrd to still be competing in 2 years time.
Plus there is the distinct possibility of fringe fighters (both in ascent and decline) like Peter, Brock, Barrett, Etienne, Dokiwari, Williams (jeremy), Maskaev, Golota, SSSam, Akinwande to still be punching for pay.
Not forgetting potential wild cards Tyson and Jones Jr.
Somewhere along the line Audley would have to beat at least three of the aforementioned before he earned a genuine world title shot.
Ignore the Mesi/Guinn smokescreen.
I know it makes it easier for the BBC to hype Harrison's chances on the world stage, but it is a threadbare logic.
In terms of the current top 20 we can expect most of
the Klits, Tua, Toney, McCline, Ruiz, Rahman, Brewster, Gomez, Oquendo, Byrd to still be competing in 2 years time.
Plus there is the distinct possibility of fringe fighters (both in ascent and decline) like Peter, Brock, Barrett, Etienne, Dokiwari, Williams (jeremy), Maskaev, Golota, SSSam, Akinwande to still be punching for pay.
Not forgetting potential wild cards Tyson and Jones Jr.
Somewhere along the line Audley would have to beat at least three of the aforementioned before he earned a genuine world title shot.
Ignore the Mesi/Guinn smokescreen.