Page 1 of 1
Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 29 Jan 2014, 20:35
by El Raincoat
My article on Lee Selby who fights Rendall Munroe for the vacant European featherweight title Saturday...
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/315879-qa-lee-selby
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 05:46
by Deserter
"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win"
Surely a typo there?
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 21:43
by El Raincoat
Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win"
Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 23:50
by Deserter
El Raincoat wrote:Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win"
Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.
By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:
http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601
As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 06:14
by El Raincoat
Deserter wrote:El Raincoat wrote:Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win"
Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.
By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:
http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601
As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.
If Lee Selby tells me he was 100/1 outsider to win, then I believe him, his uncle won £22,000 on him winning.
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 07:24
by palooka
I enjoyed the interview, Selby is an excellent boxer and he may get right to the top.
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 09:20
by Deserter
El Raincoat wrote:Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.
By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:
http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601
As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.[/quote]
El Raincoat wrote:If Lee Selby tells me he was 100/1 outsider to win, then I believe him, his uncle won £22,000 on him winning.
Yep, you're right - you should completely ignore all the factual evidence and just take the word of one individual. You'll go far in journalism

Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 09:39
by Coco
From reading the articules It seems to say Selby was 14-1 to win and 100-1 for picking the right round for ko
Re: Lee Selby Interview
Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 09:47
by Deserter
Coco wrote:From reading the articules It seems to say Selby was 14-1 to win and 100-1 for picking the right round for ko
Which is completely different to what is said in the article, that's my only point. Got no time for sloppy journalism....
anyway, getting back on track, I expect Selby to win and hope he gets the opportunity on the world stage as I'm keen on him as a fighter and suspect he'll be one of these types who raises his game to the level he's fighting at
