Page 1 of 1
The scandal of Kevin Mitchell continues...
Posted: 11 May 2004, 13:57
by bennie
This guy is being fed opponents with no chance of winning, and his opponent on Thursday is no exception:
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=047754
Posted: 11 May 2004, 14:04
by hitman_hatton1
first 10 fights i never criticise
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
especially when your still a teenager

Posted: 11 May 2004, 14:50
by TheRiverCityHippy
its not all bad, there`s a draw in there

Posted: 11 May 2004, 14:54
by adamiw
thats a joke. when the BBBC going to do something? He's beating them up.
I know Warren is just showcasing him at the moment, and he is very young, there is no rush. But it would benefit him more to be tested a little.
He can afford to take liberties agaimnst this calibre, and bad habits are inevitable to appear. It may be too late to erase them by the time he steps up against good opposition
Posted: 11 May 2004, 14:55
by Lefthookhappy19
With this guys age he's gonna be 60-0 by the time he steps it up. Thats IF he's any good and thats a bit IF. He's way over-rated and overhyped I think.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 14:58
by shakermaker
I give up!
What is the point? A punchbag will put up more resistance
Posted: 11 May 2004, 15:04
by DOG
I am beginning to wish I was mowing the lawn on Thursday :(
Posted: 11 May 2004, 15:18
by Lefthookhappy19
That first guy Mitchell beat. Man, when he threw that little man to the canvas I so badly wanted him to get back up and knock that cocky bastard out.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:14
by glittermonkey
Are there no Brits of a reasonable level for him to fight?
What he needs is someone durable who actually might hit him back. I know he's just a kid, but come on, what exactly is he going to learn by knocking guys out in the first two rounds?
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:23
by Matchfixer
glittermonkey wrote:Are there no Brits of a reasonable level for him to fight?
What he needs is someone durable who actually might hit him back. I know he's just a kid, but come on, what exactly is he going to learn by knocking guys out in the first two rounds?
Invincibility.

Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:27
by bennie
The way he jumps up on to the ropes to celebrate his wins, followed by the appearance of his mother (who Paul Cook is shagging) swanning to the ringside to give him a customary peck, is quite nauseating considering who he's beating.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:29
by dr_hook
bennie wrote:The way he jumps up on to the ropes to celebrate his wins, followed by the appearance of his mother (who Paul Cook is shagging) swanning to the ringside to give him a customary peck, is quite nauseating considering who he's beating.
Imagine when he wins the WBU title
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:31
by glittermonkey
Once he's knocked them out he should hang his head, and shuffle back to the dressing room looking at his feet.
What's he going to do when one of the guys hits him back. The look on his face will be worthy of Real_Deal's camera.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:51
by REAL_DEAL
Yes i think they could of found a better opponent, maybe peter buckely 8)
Posted: 11 May 2004, 17:56
by adamiw
bennie wrote:The way he jumps up on to the ropes to celebrate his wins, followed by the appearance of his mother (who Paul Cook is shagging) swanning to the ringside to give him a customary peck, is quite nauseating considering who he's beating.
lets just hope he's not like Farnell, who cried when he won the WBU title....it;s what he dreamed of! bless....
Posted: 11 May 2004, 18:03
by bennie
adamiw wrote:bennie wrote:The way he jumps up on to the ropes to celebrate his wins, followed by the appearance of his mother (who Paul Cook is shagging) swanning to the ringside to give him a customary peck, is quite nauseating considering who he's beating.
lets just hope he's not like Farnell, who cried when he won the WBU title....it;s what he dreamed of! bless....
Or, worse, Ricky Hatton dropping to his knees after beating 36-year-old has-been Tony Pep.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 18:31
by steve689
Mitchell will be the next Hatton IMO Making money off a spurious title with no real intentions of upping the class level, however i doubt he will have the fan base that Hatton has.
Posted: 11 May 2004, 18:32
by TheRiverCityHippy
lol
fornicating hell i cant stop laughing
cynisim par excellence, the last seven posts kinda make me feel proud to be british.
you fellas must be in your early thirties..........only going to school during the reign of thatcher develops such ironical wit.
great stuff.

Posted: 11 May 2004, 18:37
by steve689
bennie wrote:his mother (who Paul Cook is shagging)
Looks like Mitchell has a future opponent, although i don't know whether it is Paul Cook or bennie
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 11 May 2004, 18:57
by adamiw
headhunter wrote:you fellas must be in your early thirties
fortunately not!

Posted: 12 May 2004, 05:06
by Kilburn
I can live with Mitchell knocking over 10 road sweepers, he's just a baby. Warren clearly has big big plans for him, I think he's doing the right thing building up a following and getting the kid used to the spotlight.
I have no problems whatsoever with the Mitchell situation.
Posted: 12 May 2004, 05:48
by knockout
i am not keen on the way Frank is doing things...
if they feel he is too young to fight anyone with a pulse they shouldnt have made him turn over...
he was beating better kids two years ago
Posted: 12 May 2004, 13:36
by shakermaker
knockout wrote:i am not keen on the way Frank is doing things...
if they feel he is too young to fight anyone with a pulse they shouldnt have made him turn over...
he was beating better kids two years ago
exactly he was fighting better in the vest and headguard. He'd have learned more staying there for another two years instead of beating up no hopers who haven't even got a 1% chance of winning. 90/10 in favour is bad enough but fans whp pay good money deserve some kind of fight