Do a lot of the journalists just write what they read here
Posted: 13 Feb 2014, 06:04
I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
I think some probably view the insiders on here as a valuable source.TopGun wrote:I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
Certain posters have far more info than the journalists. If you know who to listen to, and read between the lines, it's usually out there.Boxing Prospect wrote:I think some probably view the insiders on here as a valuable source.TopGun wrote:I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
Yes, particularly those journalists who blame George Groves, worship Jhonny Gonzalez & need weekly updates as to Chris Eubank's whereabouts/thoughts on geopolitics/news on how his haddock-farm is coming along.TopGun wrote:I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
I didnt know you were a big Eubank fan!Datsue wrote:Yes, particularly those journalists who blame George Groves, worship Jhonny Gonzalez & need weekly updates as to Chris Eubank's whereabouts/thoughts on geopolitics/news on how his haddock-farm is coming along.TopGun wrote:I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
columbo wrote:I didnt know you were a big Eubank fan!Datsue wrote:Yes, particularly those journalists who blame George Groves, worship Jhonny Gonzalez & need weekly updates as to Chris Eubank's whereabouts/thoughts on geopolitics/news on how his haddock-farm is coming along.TopGun wrote:I often find similar comments on here to in boxing news articles the following day. Perhaps it's just coincidental or is it lazy journalism?
Carrot Cruncher still visits the forum but he no longer posts. I know his identity but I must abide by the Data Protection Acthandsofstone wrote:Plus you can never rule out that journo,s post on here then repeat it in print next day
There,s been some funny accusations on here about peoples identidys,whether they were true or not i dont know
"Carrot Cruncher" being Sir John of Rawling being one from my early days
Glad to hear it .His commentary slips into cliches sometimes but he's a lot of enthusiasm for the sport and that is always welcomeThe Law wrote:Carrot Cruncher still visits the forum but he no longer posts. I know his identity but I must abide by the Data Protection Acthandsofstone wrote:Plus you can never rule out that journo,s post on here then repeat it in print next day
There,s been some funny accusations on here about peoples identidys,whether they were true or not i dont know
"Carrot Cruncher" being Sir John of Rawling being one from my early days