BoxRec

Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss

renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss

It will be interesting to see what if anything happens now I just carnt understand where Bruce was coming from all the time I would have thought if he wasn't happy with the board he should have handed his licence in and just gone elsewhere instead of hanging around criticising all the time bruce had no right to criticise anybodies regulations when he kept breeching his own regulations in the vast majority of contests for his masters titles

I agree with you regards titles, but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence, and if I'm not mistaken, all the boxers / officials that worked his shows, so , Del Boy and haye can't box on bboc shows no more

renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence

To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?

renegadeboxing wrote:I agree with you regards titles, but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence, and if I'm not mistaken, all the boxers / officials that worked his shows, so , Del Boy and haye can't box on bboc shows no more

Yeh Right ? Can't see them being able to do anything there, they have been down that road before.

spudder56 wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss

It will be interesting to see what if anything happens now I just carnt understand where Bruce was coming from all the time I would have thought if he wasn't happy with the board he should have handed his licence in and just gone elsewhere instead of hanging around criticising all the time bruce had no right to criticise anybodies regulations when he kept breeching his own regulations in the vast majority of contests for his masters titles

He was looking to instigate change and did not really succeed, maybe a place for himself in the new regime, who knows ?

renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss

A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!

The Insider wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence

To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?

Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts

spudder56 wrote:

The Insider wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:but it was the board took Bruce to court, and withdrew his licence

To Court? Did they? Which shows? Has he promoted any?

Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts

He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.

WELL SAID EXPE SPOT ON MATE

Renegade,
Are you talking about a Board hearing or a Court hearing ?
Think your reliable source has got his wires crossed.

Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts[/quote]
He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.[/quote]

I think Bruce's motives are for fairness for ordinary licence holders. I think the best thing that could happen is for Vitali Klitchsko to come over here and help in taking a stand against the incumbent regime that is called the Board.

Callowland wrote:Spot on insider what has bb done for the sport apart from breech his own regulations and collect sanctioning fees for the masters belts

He's a leech, not it in for anything other than personal gain, which I suppose could be said for a lot of people in boxing, but at least fighters make promoters, managers and trainers money and they help to guide them to their full potential.[/quote]

I think Bruce's motives are for fairness for ordinary licence holders. I think the best thing that could happen is for Vitali Klitchsko to come over here and help in taking a stand against the incumbent regime that is called the Board.[/quote]


IMO Bruce's only interest is self interest

IMO Bruce's only interest is self interest[/quote]

What interests do the Board hold. Profit?

I hope Bruce appeals and is victorious.

followthecamel wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:Heard from a very good source today that the hearing had the judge, as prosecuter the first day, judge the second day, and also, as a witness??? And when questioned, "we can do what we like, as it's not a criminal court,. Discuss

A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!

My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)

A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories![/quote]
My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]

For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.

Callowland wrote:A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!

My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]

For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.[/quote]



Carnt believe that his sources are genuine but if they are the scumbag giving the info needs exposing not quoting IMO

Callowland wrote:A source today said renegadeboxing makes up his stories!

My source is As inside as you can get camelwiththehump, I'd love to make up stories for your amusement, but I don't think you'd have the intellect, of humor to find things funny ;)[/quote]

For the Board officials that may be commenting here to upbold the 'good' name of the Board, Renegade boxing's sources are genuine.[/quote]
Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.

Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.[/quote]

Agreed, but I am sure curiosity will get the better of them, especially on a thread like this about their 'democratic' procedures.

Callowland wrote:Board officials should not be on forums, conflict of interest, not to mention the possibility of leading to corruption in the sport, officials should always remain totally unbiased and by interacting with members and fans alike, that position can be compromised.

Agreed, but I am sure curiosity will get the better of them, especially on a thread like this about their 'democratic' procedures.[/quote]true

So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?

renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?

Which court did the hearing take place at?

The Insider wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?

Which court did the hearing take place at?

I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.

If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.

Callowland wrote:

The Insider wrote:

renegadeboxing wrote:So, how many courts would let you be judge, jury, and witness all on the same trial?

Which court did the hearing take place at?

I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.

If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.

Because Bruce Baker finally had his license taken away it's some sort of major event? Until he removes the masters titles and any involvement with Luxembourg, Malta and the GBA, he shouldn't get it back.

Callowland wrote:
I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.

If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.

Oh right so it wasn't an actual legal court of the land.

Who exactly should hear his case then if He's breaking BBBoC rules?