Page 1 of 2

Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 13:26
by reggaereggae
So - in all the (unreliable) papers today, it insinuates that Woodhouse put £5k on him to win at 50-1.... 50-1???? Clearly bullshit. The best odds you could get were 7/2 on a woodhouse win. And even if he bet himself on points, I would imagine the best odds would be around 8-1.

Ridiculous claim... And 'apparently' Woodhouse hints that the 50-1 bet was true.

Hmmmmm does anyone know the reality? If he put £5k on himself at 5-1 that is believe able... Though I never saw a price that good

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 13:29
by Paul Wad
Er, I think he put the bet on a long time ago, when he first turned professional, and not in the build up to the actual fight!

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 13:36
by reggaereggae
Oh right - you mean when he turned pro, he bet that he would win a Brit title? That makes sense and well done to him

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 13:53
by Mimmy
on talksport this morning Woodhouse would not confirm if he had or had not placed a 50k bet on himself.

BTW why has he retired?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:02
by orbtastic
50k would mean he won 2.5 million...

Presumably because he said pre-fight this was his last fight and doesn't enjoy being punched in the head for a living and has achieved the goal he set out to achieve.

I think he said on here that he found it hard explaining to his kid (kids?) the aftermath of the Mathews fight.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:04
by geoffburt07
I thought he put the bet on just before he turned pro.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:06
by keithmoonhangover
orbtastic wrote:50k would mean he won 2.5 million...

Presumably because he said pre-fight this was his last fight and doesn't enjoy being punched in the head for a living and has achieved the goal he set out to achieve.

I think he said on here that he found it hard explaining to his kid (kids?) the aftermath of the Mathews fight.
It was 5k at 50 to 1. 250,000

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:10
by orbtastic
keithmoonhangover wrote:
orbtastic wrote:50k would mean he won 2.5 million...

Presumably because he said pre-fight this was his last fight and doesn't enjoy being punched in the head for a living and has achieved the goal he set out to achieve.

I think he said on here that he found it hard explaining to his kid (kids?) the aftermath of the Mathews fight.
It was 5k at 50 to 1. 250,000
I know. Mimmy said it was a 50k bet. Which would be 2.5m at 50/1 on.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:13
by handsofstone
I asked Curtis on here about 3 months ago if he planned to fight for as long as he could and said he would fight on until his 40,s if his body would hold up

I imagine he had a change of heart after getting a shot at the British,it,s a fitting way to retire :salut:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:17
by lefty
handsofstone wrote:I asked Curtis on here about 3 months ago if he planned to fight for as long as he could and said he would fight on until his 40,s if his body would hold up

I imagine he had a change of heart after getting a shot at the British,it,s a fitting way to retire :salut:
I asked him if he had thought about retiring if he won and he said no. He tricked us all! :cry: :lol:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:19
by handsofstone
columbo wrote:
handsofstone wrote:I asked Curtis on here about 3 months ago if he planned to fight for as long as he could and said he would fight on until his 40,s if his body would hold up

I imagine he had a change of heart after getting a shot at the British,it,s a fitting way to retire :salut:
I asked him if he had thought about retiring if he won and he said no. He tricked us all! :cry: :lol:
So even after the title shot was announced he didn,t immediatly announce his retirement?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:21
by Mimmy
I do not know anything about the bet just heard it on Georgie Bingham's program at 7am this morning. and it was deffo 50k they said

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:21
by lefty
handsofstone wrote:
columbo wrote:
handsofstone wrote:I asked Curtis on here about 3 months ago if he planned to fight for as long as he could and said he would fight on until his 40,s if his body would hold up

I imagine he had a change of heart after getting a shot at the British,it,s a fitting way to retire :salut:
I asked him if he had thought about retiring if he won and he said no. He tricked us all! :cry: :lol:
So even after the title shot was announced he didn,t immediatly announce his retirement?
Na not straight off the bat if memory serves me correct. Maybe we planted the seed lol

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:26
by handsofstone
:lol: Ah i see,i just assumed that was the plan from the off

That win last night is up there with Barker and Burns winning world titles for sheer drama and emotion IMO

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:37
by maley1984
The rumour is 5 grand at 50-1 to b british champ b4 he turned pro boxer. And judging by his interview after the fight ”the drinks r on me". He cud b true if so fair play to the fella. Only met curtis once at a show but had a good chat with him about footy and boxing. I was so happy watching last night how he proved a lot of doubters wrong also the interview about his promise to his dad that he made very touching.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 14:39
by stevedoc
lets hope he hasn't lost his betting slip :)

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 17:44
by rhino222
Surely the moment curtis retires the title becomes vacant, therefor dont retire until the board orders you to defend, give yourself some time to ride the crest of the wave as british champ, you deserve it.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 17:58
by Parson Cross
It's not a rumour. It's true. Bet placed on the first day he walked in the gym that within 7 years he would win a British title. 5k at 50-1.
Sadly his dad didn't live to see him fulfil his dream but he always vowed he'd do it.
He's retiring because he's done it, knows he's reached his potential and nothing could ever match what he achieved last night.
He went to his dads grave today put the Lonsdale Belt on said a prayer - mission accomplished.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 17:59
by lefty
Parson Cross wrote:It's not a rumour. It's true. Bet placed on the first day he walked in the gym that within 7 years he would win a British title. 5k at 50-1.
Sadly his dad didn't live to see him fulfil his dream but he always vowed he'd do it.
He's retiring because he's done it, knows he's reached his potential and nothing could ever match what he achieved last night.
He went to his dads grave today put the Linsdale Belt on said a prayer - mission accomplished.
Is he off to live in Vegas now after the big win?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 18:13
by Parson Cross
Why the fornicate would he do that ? Earned more in a season playing football !

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 18:14
by lefty
Parson Cross wrote:Why the eff would he do that ? Earned more in a season playing football !
I know. I was kidding.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 23 Feb 2014, 18:15
by Parson Cross
Apart from which Goole Town would smell a rat with his travelling expenses.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 04:47
by Black Sam Bellamy
Having worked in the industry for fifteen years and seen the attitude to 'special' bets, I'm a little dubious. Which bookmaker layed this bet to £5k ?

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 06:45
by jonp
lol youl probably find at that time Curtis was betting more than that on stupid bets on a regular basis.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse bet claim

Posted: 24 Feb 2014, 07:02
by JimStone
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Having worked in the industry for fifteen years and seen the attitude to 'special' bets, I'm a little dubious. Which bookmaker layed this bet to £5k ?
I was dubious too as I've seen lads try and make the same kind of bets who have either been told to go away, limited to a much lower stake, or offered far tighter odds. However, Parson Cross is typically a rock solid source so if he says it's right, that's good enough for me. I hope it's right, I love stuff like that.