Page 1 of 2

Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:20
by ste1983
just confirmed for the Hall v Ward bill in Newcastle, 10 rounds according to Steve Lillis

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:23
by mullenman
good fight!!!

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:26
by ste1983
very interesting crossroads fight in my opinion.

if Mcclosky loses where does he go from here?

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:28
by mullenman
to the scrap yard for mcclosky if he loses this fight

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:35
by JimJim2009
That's a really good match up. I don't believe it will happen but I hope it does

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:41
by digzee
Just what Bradley needs, a good step up but it will be hard to look good against Mcclosky he's so awkward. Cant wait for this one.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 09:53
by mickey1975
Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 10:07
by pyenest77
Saunders wins quite easy for me.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 10:39
by forcefraser
This could spell the end for Mccloskey.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 11:00
by JimJim2009
mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 13:36
by expe
JimJim2009 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 14:18
by tear up
Think Paul s nearly at the end of a fine career brad will hit to hard for him and feel a stoppage is on the cards

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 14:29
by tedley
I hope it is last on the bill then McClosky can ensure everyone gets a good nights sleep

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 14:30
by whiskey
I think Saunders stops McCloskey.

Amazing to think only recently he was being linked with Juan Manuel Marquez wasn't it ?

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 15:12
by forcefraser
There was a lot of hype around Mccloskey for a while. He floored a guy who wasnt looking and then took a pasting from Prescott but was gifted a decision.

Has he actually beaten a genuinely dangerous fighter yet?

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 15:14
by steve689
Took a pasting from Prescott and got a gift decision...are you pissed? I was ringside for that one and it was a close, close fight. He got his nose busted in the sixth and showed tremendous courage and bravery to push Prescott back. He was never a come forward fighter either so that was even more impressive.

The problem with that fight was that it was effectively McCloskey's world title fight, only without the belt to show for it. He put his heart and soul into winning that and was spent and demotivated when he lost to Corley a few months' later.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 16:36
by JimJim2009
expe wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Brad will win this. He's a top domestic fighter already, just hasn't had enough fights to prove it.
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.
I was being a bit sarcastic there Expe. This is great match-making for Saunders, so credit where its due, but Gavin's opposition has been disappointing and some of the poor choice opponents have brought out the worst in Frankie, rather than the best. For the life of me I don't understand why they don't bring over some Mexicans or South Americans, it would make for more exciting fights and would showcase Frankie's skills properly.

This is great match making for Saunders. At the rate they're going with Frankie he'll soon be fighting Peter McDonagh again.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 17:15
by tear up
One fight I'd of loved to watch all northeast derby Glenn foot and brad get it on but won't happen now

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 25 Feb 2014, 19:01
by expe
JimJim2009 wrote:
expe wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:
Agreed.

I hope to see more of this sort of match making. Frankie Gavin is moving so slowly I'm amazed they didn't offer McCloskey to him instead.
He's already got the Lonsdale belt outright and McCloskey doesn't have any world rankings, definitely not with the WBO, so the fight wouldn't really get him anywhere and it could be a bit boring, I don't think the styles would come together well.
I was being a bit sarcastic there Expe. This is great match-making for Saunders, so credit where its due, but Gavin's opposition has been disappointing and some of the poor choice opponents have brought out the worst in Frankie, rather than the best. For the life of me I don't understand why they don't bring over some Mexicans or South Americans, it would make for more exciting fights and would showcase Frankie's skills properly.

This is great match making for Saunders. At the rate they're going with Frankie he'll soon be fighting Peter McDonagh again.
He'd look brilliant against the South Americans, come forward fighters are perfect for Frankie, make them miss, then pick them off all night.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 27 Feb 2014, 21:02
by IRLangmaid25
Winner pushing for the British title perhaps, Saunders the guy coming up withMcCloskey looking to rebuild after an eight round upset loss knows that if he loses to Saunders he will be pretty done for at British level. Definitely a tough pick but the younger and fresher Saunders takes this, but it won't be easy.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 02 Mar 2014, 16:56
by mickey1975
Mcloskey has pulled out.

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 02 Mar 2014, 18:43
by slapbangwhallop
forcefraser wrote:There was a lot of hype around Mccloskey for a while. He floored a guy who wasnt looking and then took a pasting from Prescott but was gifted a decision.

Has he actually beaten a genuinely dangerous fighter yet?
Talk about revisionism!! Haha

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 02 Mar 2014, 19:08
by digzee
mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
When I saw there was a new message on this thread I knew 100% this was what it was, typical, I guess we should have known better.... What now for Saunders? An eastern European?

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 02 Mar 2014, 19:19
by mainman
digzee wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
What now for Saunders? An eastern European?
you forgot to add eastern european 'BUM'.. or 'journeyman' ..... that hasnt fought for long who is paid to get beat up

seeing as though russia and ukraine are probably the best nations in boxing right now for producing talent, eastern europe has many brilliant boxers

to just say 'eastern euro' is disrespectful and incorrect in the way you are using it

you should really say ' afrobum' seeing as though the whole continent of africa is hilariously embarassingly awful at boxing

Re: Bradley Saunders v Paul Mcclosky

Posted: 02 Mar 2014, 19:35
by digzee
mainman wrote:
digzee wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Mcloskey has pulled out.
What now for Saunders? An eastern European?
you forgot to add eastern european 'BUM'.. or 'journeyman' ..... that hasnt fought for long who is paid to get beat up

seeing as though russia and ukraine are probably the best nations in boxing right now for producing talent, eastern europe has many brilliant boxers

to just say 'eastern euro' is disrespectful and incorrect in the way you are using it

you should really say ' afrobum' seeing as though the whole continent of africa is hilariously embarassingly awful at boxing
Yep true my bad, that's what I meant :salut: