Page 1 of 1

38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 08:54
by fightscorecollector
How did you all score the fight??, should be fairly straight forward scoring in this one.

Who would you like both guys to fight next??

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... xing-press

Comments welcome

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 09:02
by JimStone
I gave it to Crawford 119-109.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 15:21
by handsofstone
Crawford 119-110

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 16:00
by Final round
119-110

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 16:04
by reggaereggae
I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 16:18
by expe
116-113

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 16:19
by expe
reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 16:47
by Finn
expe wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.
I thought many of the rounds were close but Crawford still won them, i only gave Burns 2 or 3 rounds from what i remember.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 03 Mar 2014, 17:26
by crusader
expe wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.
Crawford landed more in pretty much every round, even when his workrate is low. Ricky doesn't deserve rounds just for throwing.

116-112 and 116-113 do not seem about right to me.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 04 Mar 2014, 03:46
by johnreilly
I had it 119-111, round 3 to Burns and round 11 even, the rest to Crawford. Crawford was in control almost for the whole fight and Burns didn't seem to come close to causing him any problems. Commentry was very annoying with Watt going on about Crawford boxing southpaw. He was using it to good effect, keeping Burns out of range and controlling the pace, then switching back to orthodox to deliver fast hard hits to back Burns up.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 04 Mar 2014, 12:09
by jamiedavies02
I scored it in a very pro-Burns manner, giving every round you could make a case for Burns for for him...

Still had it 115-113 Crawford.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 04 Mar 2014, 16:28
by Final round
Burns said the ref kept breaking them up and wouldn't let him work on the inside.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 04 Mar 2014, 16:40
by whiskey
expe wrote:116-113

Wow, just wow.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 08:34
by TheGman
Burns lost nearly every round,he was fightin like a guy scared to throw a shot cause he would get countered. Nit the burns of old or just crawford is that tricky and slick.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 09:43
by forcefraser
119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 09:59
by Bard of Boxrec
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 13:37
by expe
Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Would have liked to see him try and walk through Crawford's punches to try and grind him down, but maybe he felt like the punches would fall short because Crawford used the reach advantage really well.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 05 Mar 2014, 13:41
by Final round
Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 06 Mar 2014, 15:23
by Datsue
Final round wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 06 Mar 2014, 15:27
by expe
Datsue wrote:
Final round wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.
Hardly noticed the ref, apart from Jim Watt suggesting point deductions, he left them to it for the most part, the right way for me.

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Posted: 06 Mar 2014, 15:47
by Final round
Datsue wrote:

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.
Exactly but at least he's realised the lack of inside work was an issue in the fight but he's laying the blame in the wrong place