My top ten observations re: A new resident Expert
Posted: 09 Mar 2014, 12:18
An entity this prolific COULD be a group of people working together, OR an Edgar Cayce style of "channeling" or an alien hive mentality. so I will be ambiguous and make no assumptions as to the source of the ongoing incoming boundless universe of boxing information that we have been recently blessed with.
I have always been impressed with unabridged knowledge.
I have also felt one must question authority.
So....Here are my top 10 personal stream of consciousness observations.
1. He/She has some opinions that they "prefer" but no overt set of values or belief in manifest historical reality.
2. He/She has been willing to "glide ramp" theirown opinions if they smell a bit of smoke.
3. They will subtly, or not so subtly (depending on just how Sherlock Holmes YOUR thinking happens to be) "direct" their contributions to wherever he/she smells such smoke
(Seemingly in order to see if they can watch a fire of their own making become somewhat dramatic)
4. They will change their own opinion or edit a contribution IF too much attention is drawn to accountability of FACTS....even demonstrating a humble moment now and then
5. They love the "strawman" building a secondary issue, to have impact on the primary goal/opinion. Hoping you won't see the greater body of work. And thus will be drawn into the conclusions they have developed. They are the #1 contributor of "Hyperlinks to Oblivion"
6. They are nothing if not prolific......willing to immerse the reader into what appears to be around a 50/50 mix of fact and fantasy, (or if not fantasy, assumptions constructed from a very personal pretzel logic) They have taken an oath that they do not make stuff up.....so...wouldn't that mean one would have to have access to some VERY personal "fly on the wall" Sport of Boxing moments? (This is My conclusion...hell you tell me if it could possibly have some other meaning). I have asked them if they were somehow associated with the sport...but they not been forthcoming.
7. Every now and then they will go on a "fact run"....where up to 75% of the information will be at least somewhat verifiable even if only made up of a synthesis of quotes/opinions from other sources. They then appear to confabulate the "filler" information. Unless of course...they were there.
8. They do not want to break the actual rules.....they value having a place to "share" (Very tempted to use my first ICON here...you know the smiling one) But I refuse to do so.
9. As far as alternate universe confabulatory contributors go....there is no precedent. This is perhaps the finest example in sport history.
10. They are a jolly good fellow, which NOBODY can deny.
Buyer Beware!
I have always been impressed with unabridged knowledge.
I have also felt one must question authority.
So....Here are my top 10 personal stream of consciousness observations.
1. He/She has some opinions that they "prefer" but no overt set of values or belief in manifest historical reality.
2. He/She has been willing to "glide ramp" theirown opinions if they smell a bit of smoke.
3. They will subtly, or not so subtly (depending on just how Sherlock Holmes YOUR thinking happens to be) "direct" their contributions to wherever he/she smells such smoke
(Seemingly in order to see if they can watch a fire of their own making become somewhat dramatic)
4. They will change their own opinion or edit a contribution IF too much attention is drawn to accountability of FACTS....even demonstrating a humble moment now and then
5. They love the "strawman" building a secondary issue, to have impact on the primary goal/opinion. Hoping you won't see the greater body of work. And thus will be drawn into the conclusions they have developed. They are the #1 contributor of "Hyperlinks to Oblivion"
6. They are nothing if not prolific......willing to immerse the reader into what appears to be around a 50/50 mix of fact and fantasy, (or if not fantasy, assumptions constructed from a very personal pretzel logic) They have taken an oath that they do not make stuff up.....so...wouldn't that mean one would have to have access to some VERY personal "fly on the wall" Sport of Boxing moments? (This is My conclusion...hell you tell me if it could possibly have some other meaning). I have asked them if they were somehow associated with the sport...but they not been forthcoming.
7. Every now and then they will go on a "fact run"....where up to 75% of the information will be at least somewhat verifiable even if only made up of a synthesis of quotes/opinions from other sources. They then appear to confabulate the "filler" information. Unless of course...they were there.
8. They do not want to break the actual rules.....they value having a place to "share" (Very tempted to use my first ICON here...you know the smiling one) But I refuse to do so.
9. As far as alternate universe confabulatory contributors go....there is no precedent. This is perhaps the finest example in sport history.
10. They are a jolly good fellow, which NOBODY can deny.
Buyer Beware!