lewison v mcdermott
Posted: 19 Mar 2014, 10:17
Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
Lewiston is boxing Fast Eddie Chambers next week isn't he?rm1 wrote:Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
Though I know what you meant, your post has given me a disgusting mental image of McDermott taking his clothes off.rm1 wrote:Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
ILikeBeer wrote:Though I know what you meant, your post has given me a disgusting mental image of McDermott taking his clothes off.rm1 wrote:Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
Is he? interesting one thatmickey1975 wrote:Lewiston is boxing Fast Eddie Chambers next week isn't he?rm1 wrote:Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
Warren said he was unable to promote the contest so it's going back out to purse bids, nothing to do with McDermott, he's the one now sat doing nothing while Lewison fights Chambers. If anyone should be stripped, then Lewison should be stripped of the mandatory position since it's obvious why Wazza said he couldn't promote the fight, Lewison had another fight lined up, but needed a fall back option if he lost.Horse wrote:McDermott must be stripped.
12th April I believe. Also heard that he was meant to fight on the Stuart hall undercard.mickey1975 wrote:Lewiston is boxing Fast Eddie Chambers next week isn't he?rm1 wrote:Why is this fight off whats wrong with McDermott this time that he can't defend his English title ? he hasn't fought in over year he wants stripping.
X2 Darcy good callDarcy Delaney wrote:McDermott vs Sexton ?? would be a good fight
But is it McDermott's fault?He must be gutted by not fighting. At least Lewison still gets to fight...rm1 wrote:Mc dermott versus anybody would be a start. he needs to defend or vacate there is an exciting heavy weight division in this country people like Mcdermott are just blocking others progress with their inactivity.
McDermott knocked Sexton spark out in sparring a couple of years back.tear up wrote:X2 Darcy good callDarcy Delaney wrote:McDermott vs Sexton ?? would be a good fight
Karl Jade wrote:McDermott knocked Sexton spark out in sparring a couple of years back.tear up wrote:X2 Darcy good callDarcy Delaney wrote:McDermott vs Sexton ?? would be a good fight
Two people have said it, including McDermott - though he didn't reveal it to Sky when asked to be fair to him.Londonirish wrote:
Was you at the Sparring? Or is that what John Said
Karl Jade wrote:Two people have said it, including McDermott - though he didn't reveal it to Sky when asked to be fair to him.Londonirish wrote:
Was you at the Sparring? Or is that what John Said
Thats rubbish. The purse bid was won by allegedly who decided they did not want to promote the fight anymore. I intended to promote it myself but decided instead to release Ian from his contract for reasons that I do not want to state.london wrote:As I just said on the LarryO Hearn thread on Ian Lewisons twitter he's implying it was Steve Goodwin that pulled the fight with McDermott.
No, it shouldn't be depressing at all.columbo wrote:Gotta be a bit depressing going from the Lofty heights Chambers has boxed at to boxing Lewison *no offence*